Open Access and Scholarly Values:A CONVERSATION. Cohen, D. J., Ramsay, S., & Fitzpatrick, K. In Cohen, D. J. & Scheinfeldt, T., editors, Hacking the Academy, of New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities, pages 39–47. University of Michigan Press, 2013. 🏷️ /unread
Paper abstract bibtex There is a supply side and a demand side to scholarly communication. The supply side is the creation of scholarly works, including writing, peer review, editing, and the form of publication. The demand side is much more elusive—the mental state of the audience that leads them to “buy” what the supply side has produced. In order for the social contract to work, for engaged reading to happen, and for credit to be given to the author—or editor of a scholarly collection—both sides need to be aligned properly. How can we increase the supply of open-access scholarship and 【摘要翻译】学术交流有供应方和需求方之分。供应方是学术著作的创作,包括写作、同行评审、编辑和出版形式。而需求方则更加难以捉摸–受众的精神状态导致他们 "购买 "供应方所创作的作品。为了让社会契约发挥作用,让参与式阅读得以实现,让作者或学术文集的编辑获得荣誉,这两方面都需要妥善协调。 我们怎样才能增加开放存取学术成果的供应量?
@incollection{cohen2013a,
series = {New {Approaches} to {Scholarship} and {Teaching} from {Digital} {Humanities}},
title = {Open {Access} and {Scholarly} {Values}:{A} {CONVERSATION}},
isbn = {null},
shorttitle = {开放获取与学术价值:对话},
url = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swj3.12},
abstract = {There is a supply side and a demand side to scholarly communication. The supply side is the creation of scholarly works, including writing, peer review, editing, and the form of publication. The demand side is much more elusive—the mental state of the audience that leads them to “buy” what the supply side has produced. In order for the social contract to work, for engaged reading to happen, and for credit to be given to the author—or editor of a scholarly collection—both sides need to be aligned properly. How can we increase the supply of open-access scholarship and
【摘要翻译】学术交流有供应方和需求方之分。供应方是学术著作的创作,包括写作、同行评审、编辑和出版形式。而需求方则更加难以捉摸--受众的精神状态导致他们 "购买 "供应方所创作的作品。为了让社会契约发挥作用,让参与式阅读得以实现,让作者或学术文集的编辑获得荣誉,这两方面都需要妥善协调。 我们怎样才能增加开放存取学术成果的供应量?},
language = {en},
urldate = {2020-01-14},
booktitle = {Hacking the {Academy}},
publisher = {University of Michigan Press},
author = {Cohen, Daniel J. and Ramsay, Stephen and Fitzpatrick, Kathleen},
editor = {Cohen, Daniel J. and Scheinfeldt, Tom},
year = {2013},
note = {🏷️ /unread},
keywords = {/unread},
pages = {39--47},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Xaqz9kdqPGGAiW59A","bibbaseid":"cohen-ramsay-fitzpatrick-openaccessandscholarlyvaluesaconversation-2013","author_short":["Cohen, D. J.","Ramsay, S.","Fitzpatrick, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","series":"New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities","title":"Open Access and Scholarly Values:A CONVERSATION","isbn":"null","shorttitle":"开放获取与学术价值:对话","url":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swj3.12","abstract":"There is a supply side and a demand side to scholarly communication. The supply side is the creation of scholarly works, including writing, peer review, editing, and the form of publication. The demand side is much more elusive—the mental state of the audience that leads them to “buy” what the supply side has produced. In order for the social contract to work, for engaged reading to happen, and for credit to be given to the author—or editor of a scholarly collection—both sides need to be aligned properly. How can we increase the supply of open-access scholarship and 【摘要翻译】学术交流有供应方和需求方之分。供应方是学术著作的创作,包括写作、同行评审、编辑和出版形式。而需求方则更加难以捉摸–受众的精神状态导致他们 \"购买 \"供应方所创作的作品。为了让社会契约发挥作用,让参与式阅读得以实现,让作者或学术文集的编辑获得荣誉,这两方面都需要妥善协调。 我们怎样才能增加开放存取学术成果的供应量?","language":"en","urldate":"2020-01-14","booktitle":"Hacking the Academy","publisher":"University of Michigan Press","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cohen"],"firstnames":["Daniel","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ramsay"],"firstnames":["Stephen"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fitzpatrick"],"firstnames":["Kathleen"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cohen"],"firstnames":["Daniel","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Scheinfeldt"],"firstnames":["Tom"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2013","note":"🏷️ /unread","keywords":"/unread","pages":"39–47","bibtex":"@incollection{cohen2013a,\n\tseries = {New {Approaches} to {Scholarship} and {Teaching} from {Digital} {Humanities}},\n\ttitle = {Open {Access} and {Scholarly} {Values}:{A} {CONVERSATION}},\n\tisbn = {null},\n\tshorttitle = {开放获取与学术价值:对话},\n\turl = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swj3.12},\n\tabstract = {There is a supply side and a demand side to scholarly communication. The supply side is the creation of scholarly works, including writing, peer review, editing, and the form of publication. The demand side is much more elusive—the mental state of the audience that leads them to “buy” what the supply side has produced. In order for the social contract to work, for engaged reading to happen, and for credit to be given to the author—or editor of a scholarly collection—both sides need to be aligned properly. How can we increase the supply of open-access scholarship and\n\n【摘要翻译】学术交流有供应方和需求方之分。供应方是学术著作的创作,包括写作、同行评审、编辑和出版形式。而需求方则更加难以捉摸--受众的精神状态导致他们 \"购买 \"供应方所创作的作品。为了让社会契约发挥作用,让参与式阅读得以实现,让作者或学术文集的编辑获得荣誉,这两方面都需要妥善协调。 我们怎样才能增加开放存取学术成果的供应量?},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-01-14},\n\tbooktitle = {Hacking the {Academy}},\n\tpublisher = {University of Michigan Press},\n\tauthor = {Cohen, Daniel J. and Ramsay, Stephen and Fitzpatrick, Kathleen},\n\teditor = {Cohen, Daniel J. and Scheinfeldt, Tom},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread},\n\tkeywords = {/unread},\n\tpages = {39--47},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Cohen, D. J.","Ramsay, S.","Fitzpatrick, K."],"editor_short":["Cohen, D. J.","Scheinfeldt, T."],"key":"cohen2013a","id":"cohen2013a","bibbaseid":"cohen-ramsay-fitzpatrick-openaccessandscholarlyvaluesaconversation-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65swj3.12"},"keyword":["/unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/NZUH6GJC/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["ZSPeFD7aTg23knb8Q","rYbpdLFZfeZ3kBGfi"],"keywords":["/unread"],"search_terms":["open","access","scholarly","values","conversation","cohen","ramsay","fitzpatrick"],"title":"Open Access and Scholarly Values:A CONVERSATION","year":2013}