How NOT to Review a Paper: The Tools and Techniques of the Adversarial Reviewer. Cormode, G. 37(4):100–104.
How NOT to Review a Paper: The Tools and Techniques of the Adversarial Reviewer [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
There are several useful guides available for how to review a paper in Computer Science [10, 6, 12, 7, 2]. These are soberly presented, carefully reasoned and sensibly argued. As a result, they are not much fun. So, as a contrast, this note is a checklist of how not to review a paper. It details techniques that are unethical, unfair, or just plain nasty. Since in Computer Science we often present arguments about how an adversary would approach a particular problem, this note describes the adversary's strategy.
@article{cormodeHowNOTReview2009,
  title = {How {{NOT}} to {{Review}} a {{Paper}}: {{The Tools}} and {{Techniques}} of the {{Adversarial Reviewer}}},
  author = {Cormode, Graham},
  date = {2009-03},
  journaltitle = {SIGMOD Rec.},
  volume = {37},
  pages = {100--104},
  issn = {0163-5808},
  doi = {10.1145/1519103.1519122},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1145/1519103.1519122},
  abstract = {There are several useful guides available for how to review a paper in Computer Science [10, 6, 12, 7, 2]. These are soberly presented, carefully reasoned and sensibly argued. As a result, they are not much fun. So, as a contrast, this note is a checklist of how not to review a paper. It details techniques that are unethical, unfair, or just plain nasty. Since in Computer Science we often present arguments about how an adversary would approach a particular problem, this note describes the adversary's strategy.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-4311739,check-list,peer-review,publication-bias,science-ethics},
  number = {4}
}

Downloads: 0