The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: Implications for action control in visual neglect. Coulthard, E., Parton, A., & Husain, M. Neuropsychologia, 2007. doi abstract bibtex In our recent review of action control deficits in hemispatial neglect (Coulthard, Parton & Husain, 2006), we concluded that many patients with the disorder have deficits in visuomotor control. Himmelbach, Karnath and Perenin (2006) question this conclusion, and argue instead that there are no action deficits in neglect. We proposed that rather than being specific to the neglect syndrome, action control deficits are more likely to relate to lesion location. Although many of these impairments may contribute to the manifestation of neglect, they may also occur in brain-damaged patients without the condition. In this article we explore this framework further, discussing how neglect behaviour may emerge from damage to a set of visuomotor – or cognitive – modules, or their connections. Central to our view is the idea that the critical combination of deficits leading to neglect varies considerably between cases, and that visuomotor or cognitive modules disrupted in the syndrome may not in fact be specific to neglect.
@article{coulthard_modular_2007,
title = {The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: {Implications} for action control in visual neglect},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020},
abstract = {In our recent review of action control deficits in hemispatial neglect (Coulthard, Parton \& Husain, 2006), we concluded that many patients with the disorder have deficits in visuomotor control. Himmelbach, Karnath and Perenin (2006) question this conclusion, and argue instead that there are no action deficits in neglect. We proposed that rather than being specific to the neglect syndrome, action control deficits are more likely to relate to lesion location. Although many of these impairments may contribute to the manifestation of neglect, they may also occur in brain-damaged patients without the condition. In this article we explore this framework further, discussing how neglect behaviour may emerge from damage to a set of visuomotor – or cognitive – modules, or their connections. Central to our view is the idea that the critical combination of deficits leading to neglect varies considerably between cases, and that visuomotor or cognitive modules disrupted in the syndrome may not in fact be specific to neglect.},
journal = {Neuropsychologia},
author = {Coulthard, E. and Parton, A. and Husain, M.},
year = {2007},
keywords = {\#nosource},
pages = {doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"nbhzbueZvCsGGYGnr","bibbaseid":"coulthard-parton-husain-themodulararchitectureoftheneglectsyndromeimplicationsforactioncontrolinvisualneglect-2007","author_short":["Coulthard, E.","Parton, A.","Husain, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: Implications for action control in visual neglect","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020","abstract":"In our recent review of action control deficits in hemispatial neglect (Coulthard, Parton & Husain, 2006), we concluded that many patients with the disorder have deficits in visuomotor control. Himmelbach, Karnath and Perenin (2006) question this conclusion, and argue instead that there are no action deficits in neglect. We proposed that rather than being specific to the neglect syndrome, action control deficits are more likely to relate to lesion location. Although many of these impairments may contribute to the manifestation of neglect, they may also occur in brain-damaged patients without the condition. In this article we explore this framework further, discussing how neglect behaviour may emerge from damage to a set of visuomotor – or cognitive – modules, or their connections. Central to our view is the idea that the critical combination of deficits leading to neglect varies considerably between cases, and that visuomotor or cognitive modules disrupted in the syndrome may not in fact be specific to neglect.","journal":"Neuropsychologia","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Coulthard"],"firstnames":["E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Parton"],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Husain"],"firstnames":["M."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2007","keywords":"#nosource","pages":"doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020","bibtex":"@article{coulthard_modular_2007,\n\ttitle = {The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: {Implications} for action control in visual neglect},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020},\n\tabstract = {In our recent review of action control deficits in hemispatial neglect (Coulthard, Parton \\& Husain, 2006), we concluded that many patients with the disorder have deficits in visuomotor control. Himmelbach, Karnath and Perenin (2006) question this conclusion, and argue instead that there are no action deficits in neglect. We proposed that rather than being specific to the neglect syndrome, action control deficits are more likely to relate to lesion location. Although many of these impairments may contribute to the manifestation of neglect, they may also occur in brain-damaged patients without the condition. In this article we explore this framework further, discussing how neglect behaviour may emerge from damage to a set of visuomotor – or cognitive – modules, or their connections. Central to our view is the idea that the critical combination of deficits leading to neglect varies considerably between cases, and that visuomotor or cognitive modules disrupted in the syndrome may not in fact be specific to neglect.},\n\tjournal = {Neuropsychologia},\n\tauthor = {Coulthard, E. and Parton, A. and Husain, M.},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource},\n\tpages = {doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.01.020},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Coulthard, E.","Parton, A.","Husain, M."],"key":"coulthard_modular_2007","id":"coulthard_modular_2007","bibbaseid":"coulthard-parton-husain-themodulararchitectureoftheneglectsyndromeimplicationsforactioncontrolinvisualneglect-2007","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["#nosource"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/marsicanus","dataSources":["MDN92uztrK9rBiHJj"],"keywords":["#nosource"],"search_terms":["modular","architecture","neglect","syndrome","implications","action","control","visual","neglect","coulthard","parton","husain"],"title":"The modular architecture of the neglect syndrome: Implications for action control in visual neglect","year":2007}