@article{ Craig96,
  author = {Craig, J. C.},
  title = {Interference in identifying tactile patterns: response competition
	and temporal integration},
  journal = {Somatosensory and Motor Research},
  year = {1996},
  volume = {13},
  pages = {199-213},
  number = {3-4},
  abstract = { When two vibrotactile spatial patterns-one target and one nontarget
	pattern-are presented to the same location, subjects may have difficulty
	in identifying the target pattern. The difficulty may be in part
	the result of the target's and nontarget's being processed to the
	point of evoking competing responses. Subjects err by responding
	with the nontarget. Target identification may also be interfered
	with because the target and nontarget form a composite pattern through
	temporal integration, and subjects are unable to separate the features
	of the target and nontarget patterns. The present study addressed
	the issue of whether a response competition explanation of interference
	is consistent with the existence of temporal integration and the
	formation of composite patterns. A series of three experiments examined
	temporal integration and its relationship to response competition.
	The results indicate that both temporal integration and response
	competition can occur under similar stimulus conditions, and that
	both can interfere with the identification of target patterns. The
	results further indicate that even under conditions in which composite
	patterns are formed, the two patterns that constitute the composite
	are still identifiable. It is concluded that the interference in
	pattern identification attributed to response competition is not
	a result of temporal integration.},
  en_number = {14.2: }
}

{"_id":"asipeAM65dpduSefv","bibbaseid":"craig-interferenceinidentifyingtactilepatternsresponsecompetitionandtemporalintegration-1996","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-02-08T05:14:41.239Z","title":"Interference in identifying tactile patterns: response competition and temporal integration","author_short":["Craig, J.<nbsp>C."],"year":1996,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://cnslab.mb.jhu.edu/niebase.bib","bibdata":{"abstract":"When two vibrotactile spatial patterns-one target and one nontarget pattern-are presented to the same location, subjects may have difficulty in identifying the target pattern. The difficulty may be in part the result of the target's and nontarget's being processed to the point of evoking competing responses. Subjects err by responding with the nontarget. Target identification may also be interfered with because the target and nontarget form a composite pattern through temporal integration, and subjects are unable to separate the features of the target and nontarget patterns. The present study addressed the issue of whether a response competition explanation of interference is consistent with the existence of temporal integration and the formation of composite patterns. A series of three experiments examined temporal integration and its relationship to response competition. The results indicate that both temporal integration and response competition can occur under similar stimulus conditions, and that both can interfere with the identification of target patterns. The results further indicate that even under conditions in which composite patterns are formed, the two patterns that constitute the composite are still identifiable. It is concluded that the interference in pattern identification attributed to response competition is not a result of temporal integration.","author":["Craig, J. C."],"author_short":["Craig, J.<nbsp>C."],"bibtex":"@article{ Craig96,\n author = {Craig, J. C.},\n title = {Interference in identifying tactile patterns: response competition\n\tand temporal integration},\n journal = {Somatosensory and Motor Research},\n year = {1996},\n volume = {13},\n pages = {199-213},\n number = {3-4},\n abstract = { When two vibrotactile spatial patterns-one target and one nontarget\n\tpattern-are presented to the same location, subjects may have difficulty\n\tin identifying the target pattern. The difficulty may be in part\n\tthe result of the target's and nontarget's being processed to the\n\tpoint of evoking competing responses. Subjects err by responding\n\twith the nontarget. Target identification may also be interfered\n\twith because the target and nontarget form a composite pattern through\n\ttemporal integration, and subjects are unable to separate the features\n\tof the target and nontarget patterns. The present study addressed\n\tthe issue of whether a response competition explanation of interference\n\tis consistent with the existence of temporal integration and the\n\tformation of composite patterns. A series of three experiments examined\n\ttemporal integration and its relationship to response competition.\n\tThe results indicate that both temporal integration and response\n\tcompetition can occur under similar stimulus conditions, and that\n\tboth can interfere with the identification of target patterns. The\n\tresults further indicate that even under conditions in which composite\n\tpatterns are formed, the two patterns that constitute the composite\n\tare still identifiable. It is concluded that the interference in\n\tpattern identification attributed to response competition is not\n\ta result of temporal integration.},\n en_number = {14.2: }\n}","bibtype":"article","en_number":"14.2:","id":"Craig96","journal":"Somatosensory and Motor Research","key":"Craig96","number":"3-4","pages":"199-213","title":"Interference in identifying tactile patterns: response competition and temporal integration","type":"article","volume":"13","year":"1996","bibbaseid":"craig-interferenceinidentifyingtactilepatternsresponsecompetitionandtemporalintegration-1996","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["interference","identifying","tactile","patterns","response","competition","temporal","integration","craig"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["ErLXoH8mqSjESnrN5"]}