SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach. Cranley, L., A., Hoben, M., Yeung, J., Estabrooks, C., A., Norton, P., G., & Wagg, A. BMC Health Services Research, 18:174, 12, 2018. ![SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website abstract bibtex Background Interventions to improve quality of care for residents of long-term care facilities, and to examine the sustainability and spread of such initiatives, remain a top research priority. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess the extent to which activities initiated in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative study using care aide led teams were sustained or spread following cessation of the initial project and to identify factors that led to its success. Methods This study used an exploratory mixed methods study design and was conducted in seven residential long-term care facilities in two Canadian provinces. Sustainability and spread of QI activities were assessed by a questionnaire over five time points for 18 months following the collaborative study with staff from both intervention with non-intervention units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care managers at six and 12 months. QI team success in applying the QI model was ranked as high, medium, or low using criteria developed by the research team. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and General Estimating Equations were used to analyze the data. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 683 surveys were received over the five time periods from 476 unique individuals on a facility unit. Seven managers were interviewed. A total of 533 surveys were analyzed. While both intervention and non-intervention units experienced a decline over time in all outcome measures, this decline was significantly less pronounced on intervention units. Facilities with medium and high success ranking had significantly higher scores in all four outcomes than facilities with a low success ranking. Care aides reported significantly less involvement of others in QI activities, less empowerment and less satisfaction with the quality of their work life than regulated care providers. Manager interviews provided evidence of sustainability of QI activities on the intervention units in four of the seven facilities up to 18 months following the intervention and demonstrated the need for continued staff and leadership engagement. Conclusion Sustainability of a QI project which empowers and engages care aides is possible and achievable, but requires ongoing staff and leadership engagement.
@article{
title = {SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach},
type = {article},
year = {2018},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
pages = {174},
volume = {18},
websites = {https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0},
month = {12},
day = {12},
id = {75595627-9370-3fb4-bf30-1bb7e4fdb826},
created = {2018-03-19T20:04:27.089Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {369acd69-1fe7-313d-821e-cb7bbe1ddab2},
group_id = {c58111b6-6088-3a92-94c9-4742fdd13d6f},
last_modified = {2018-03-19T22:00:04.752Z},
tags = {SCOPE},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Cranley2018a},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Background Interventions to improve quality of care for residents of long-term care facilities, and to examine the sustainability and spread of such initiatives, remain a top research priority. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess the extent to which activities initiated in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative study using care aide led teams were sustained or spread following cessation of the initial project and to identify factors that led to its success. Methods This study used an exploratory mixed methods study design and was conducted in seven residential long-term care facilities in two Canadian provinces. Sustainability and spread of QI activities were assessed by a questionnaire over five time points for 18 months following the collaborative study with staff from both intervention with non-intervention units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care managers at six and 12 months. QI team success in applying the QI model was ranked as high, medium, or low using criteria developed by the research team. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and General Estimating Equations were used to analyze the data. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 683 surveys were received over the five time periods from 476 unique individuals on a facility unit. Seven managers were interviewed. A total of 533 surveys were analyzed. While both intervention and non-intervention units experienced a decline over time in all outcome measures, this decline was significantly less pronounced on intervention units. Facilities with medium and high success ranking had significantly higher scores in all four outcomes than facilities with a low success ranking. Care aides reported significantly less involvement of others in QI activities, less empowerment and less satisfaction with the quality of their work life than regulated care providers. Manager interviews provided evidence of sustainability of QI activities on the intervention units in four of the seven facilities up to 18 months following the intervention and demonstrated the need for continued staff and leadership engagement. Conclusion Sustainability of a QI project which empowers and engages care aides is possible and achievable, but requires ongoing staff and leadership engagement.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Cranley, Lisa A. and Hoben, Matthias and Yeung, Jasper and Estabrooks, Carole A. and Norton, Peter G. and Wagg, Adrian},
journal = {BMC Health Services Research}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"m5ri9ZMfKn7np5yzr","bibbaseid":"cranley-hoben-yeung-estabrooks-norton-wagg-scopeoutsustainabilityandspreadofqualityimprovementactivitiesinlongtermcareamixedmethodsapproach-2018","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-03-21T15:20:17.647Z","title":"SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach","author_short":["Cranley, L., A.","Hoben, M.","Yeung, J.","Estabrooks, C., A.","Norton, P., G.","Wagg, A."],"year":2018,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach","type":"article","year":"2018","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"174","volume":"18","websites":"https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0","month":"12","day":"12","id":"75595627-9370-3fb4-bf30-1bb7e4fdb826","created":"2018-03-19T20:04:27.089Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"369acd69-1fe7-313d-821e-cb7bbe1ddab2","group_id":"c58111b6-6088-3a92-94c9-4742fdd13d6f","last_modified":"2018-03-19T22:00:04.752Z","tags":"SCOPE","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Cranley2018a","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Background Interventions to improve quality of care for residents of long-term care facilities, and to examine the sustainability and spread of such initiatives, remain a top research priority. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess the extent to which activities initiated in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative study using care aide led teams were sustained or spread following cessation of the initial project and to identify factors that led to its success. Methods This study used an exploratory mixed methods study design and was conducted in seven residential long-term care facilities in two Canadian provinces. Sustainability and spread of QI activities were assessed by a questionnaire over five time points for 18 months following the collaborative study with staff from both intervention with non-intervention units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care managers at six and 12 months. QI team success in applying the QI model was ranked as high, medium, or low using criteria developed by the research team. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and General Estimating Equations were used to analyze the data. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 683 surveys were received over the five time periods from 476 unique individuals on a facility unit. Seven managers were interviewed. A total of 533 surveys were analyzed. While both intervention and non-intervention units experienced a decline over time in all outcome measures, this decline was significantly less pronounced on intervention units. Facilities with medium and high success ranking had significantly higher scores in all four outcomes than facilities with a low success ranking. Care aides reported significantly less involvement of others in QI activities, less empowerment and less satisfaction with the quality of their work life than regulated care providers. Manager interviews provided evidence of sustainability of QI activities on the intervention units in four of the seven facilities up to 18 months following the intervention and demonstrated the need for continued staff and leadership engagement. Conclusion Sustainability of a QI project which empowers and engages care aides is possible and achievable, but requires ongoing staff and leadership engagement.","bibtype":"article","author":"Cranley, Lisa A. and Hoben, Matthias and Yeung, Jasper and Estabrooks, Carole A. and Norton, Peter G. and Wagg, Adrian","journal":"BMC Health Services Research","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach},\n type = {article},\n year = {2018},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {174},\n volume = {18},\n websites = {https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0},\n month = {12},\n day = {12},\n id = {75595627-9370-3fb4-bf30-1bb7e4fdb826},\n created = {2018-03-19T20:04:27.089Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {369acd69-1fe7-313d-821e-cb7bbe1ddab2},\n group_id = {c58111b6-6088-3a92-94c9-4742fdd13d6f},\n last_modified = {2018-03-19T22:00:04.752Z},\n tags = {SCOPE},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Cranley2018a},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Background Interventions to improve quality of care for residents of long-term care facilities, and to examine the sustainability and spread of such initiatives, remain a top research priority. The purpose of this exploratory study was to assess the extent to which activities initiated in a quality improvement (QI) collaborative study using care aide led teams were sustained or spread following cessation of the initial project and to identify factors that led to its success. Methods This study used an exploratory mixed methods study design and was conducted in seven residential long-term care facilities in two Canadian provinces. Sustainability and spread of QI activities were assessed by a questionnaire over five time points for 18 months following the collaborative study with staff from both intervention with non-intervention units. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with care managers at six and 12 months. QI team success in applying the QI model was ranked as high, medium, or low using criteria developed by the research team. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, and General Estimating Equations were used to analyze the data. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 683 surveys were received over the five time periods from 476 unique individuals on a facility unit. Seven managers were interviewed. A total of 533 surveys were analyzed. While both intervention and non-intervention units experienced a decline over time in all outcome measures, this decline was significantly less pronounced on intervention units. Facilities with medium and high success ranking had significantly higher scores in all four outcomes than facilities with a low success ranking. Care aides reported significantly less involvement of others in QI activities, less empowerment and less satisfaction with the quality of their work life than regulated care providers. Manager interviews provided evidence of sustainability of QI activities on the intervention units in four of the seven facilities up to 18 months following the intervention and demonstrated the need for continued staff and leadership engagement. Conclusion Sustainability of a QI project which empowers and engages care aides is possible and achievable, but requires ongoing staff and leadership engagement.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Cranley, Lisa A. and Hoben, Matthias and Yeung, Jasper and Estabrooks, Carole A. and Norton, Peter G. and Wagg, Adrian},\n journal = {BMC Health Services Research}\n}","author_short":["Cranley, L., A.","Hoben, M.","Yeung, J.","Estabrooks, C., A.","Norton, P., G.","Wagg, A."],"urls":{"Website":"https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-2978-0"},"bibbaseid":"cranley-hoben-yeung-estabrooks-norton-wagg-scopeoutsustainabilityandspreadofqualityimprovementactivitiesinlongtermcareamixedmethodsapproach-2018","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["scopeout","sustainability","spread","quality","improvement","activities","long","term","care","mixed","methods","approach","cranley","hoben","yeung","estabrooks","norton","wagg"],"keywords":["care aide","quality improvement","residential long-term care facilities","spread","sustainability"],"authorIDs":["570fd4ecd02f3b55490002d5"]}