@misc{cryer_use_nodate,
	title = {To {Use} {AI} or {Not} to {Use} {AI}? {A} {Student}’s {Burden}},
	shorttitle = {To {Use} {AI} or {Not} to {Use} {AI}?},
	url = {https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/12/09/ai-shifts-responsibility-academic-integrity-opinion},
	abstract = {In shifting much of the responsibility for upholding academic integrity from instructors to students, we leave students with an unfair burden, Daniel Cryer writes. Imagine you’re a 19-year-old college sophomore. Each time you’re given a writing assignment, you weigh your options for using AI to complete it. Your professors have AI policies, but they all seem a little naïve. One says you can use it for brainstorming and researching but not actual writing. But when you ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or any other tool to jump-start your research, it gives you ready-made content for your paper. Are you supposed to ignore it?},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2025-05-14},
	journal = {Inside Higher Ed},
	author = {Cryer, Daniel},
	keywords = {premium},
}

{"_id":"3EGxyhWuR5RFTc2xc","bibbaseid":"cryer-touseaiornottouseaiastudentsburden","author_short":["Cryer, D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"To Use AI or Not to Use AI? A Student’s Burden","shorttitle":"To Use AI or Not to Use AI?","url":"https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/12/09/ai-shifts-responsibility-academic-integrity-opinion","abstract":"In shifting much of the responsibility for upholding academic integrity from instructors to students, we leave students with an unfair burden, Daniel Cryer writes. Imagine you’re a 19-year-old college sophomore. Each time you’re given a writing assignment, you weigh your options for using AI to complete it. Your professors have AI policies, but they all seem a little naïve. One says you can use it for brainstorming and researching but not actual writing. But when you ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or any other tool to jump-start your research, it gives you ready-made content for your paper. Are you supposed to ignore it?","language":"en","urldate":"2025-05-14","journal":"Inside Higher Ed","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cryer"],"firstnames":["Daniel"],"suffixes":[]}],"keywords":"premium","bibtex":"@misc{cryer_use_nodate,\n\ttitle = {To {Use} {AI} or {Not} to {Use} {AI}? {A} {Student}’s {Burden}},\n\tshorttitle = {To {Use} {AI} or {Not} to {Use} {AI}?},\n\turl = {https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/12/09/ai-shifts-responsibility-academic-integrity-opinion},\n\tabstract = {In shifting much of the responsibility for upholding academic integrity from instructors to students, we leave students with an unfair burden, Daniel Cryer writes. Imagine you’re a 19-year-old college sophomore. Each time you’re given a writing assignment, you weigh your options for using AI to complete it. Your professors have AI policies, but they all seem a little naïve. One says you can use it for brainstorming and researching but not actual writing. But when you ask ChatGPT, Perplexity or any other tool to jump-start your research, it gives you ready-made content for your paper. Are you supposed to ignore it?},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2025-05-14},\n\tjournal = {Inside Higher Ed},\n\tauthor = {Cryer, Daniel},\n\tkeywords = {premium},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Cryer, D."],"key":"cryer_use_nodate","id":"cryer_use_nodate","bibbaseid":"cryer-touseaiornottouseaiastudentsburden","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.insidehighered.com/opinion/views/2024/12/09/ai-shifts-responsibility-academic-integrity-opinion"},"keyword":["premium"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/bethhoppe/5609059","dataSources":["tnM59J55CyNeZmQ8S"],"keywords":["premium"],"search_terms":["use","use","student","burden","cryer"],"title":"To Use AI or Not to Use AI? A Student’s Burden","year":null}