Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: A discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives. Cumyn, A., Ouellet, K., Côté, A., Francoeur, C., & St-Onge, C. Ethics & Behavior, 0(0):1–16, November, 2018. ![Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: A discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex The ethical conduct of research rests largely on researchers, and as such, an understanding of how they perceive and enact their role in research is paramount. However, the literature around ethics and research mostly focuses on researchers’ perception of Research Ethics Boards (REB; also known as Institutional Review Boards) roles and functions. To fill that gap, we analyzed the perceptions of researchers, REB members, and influential parties (n = 40) about researchers’ role in the ethical conduct of research through discourse analysis. Three discourses emerged: researchers as reflective practitioners, protectors of participants, and technicians. Understanding the commonalities and differences among the discourses may foster a shared and compelling institutional research culture.
@article{cumyn_role_2018,
title = {Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: {A} discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives},
volume = {0},
issn = {1050-8422},
shorttitle = {Role of {Researchers} in the {Ethical} {Conduct} of {Research}},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671},
doi = {10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671},
abstract = {The ethical conduct of research rests largely on researchers, and as such, an understanding of how they perceive and enact their role in research is paramount. However, the literature around ethics and research mostly focuses on researchers’ perception of Research Ethics Boards (REB; also known as Institutional Review Boards) roles and functions. To fill that gap, we analyzed the perceptions of researchers, REB members, and influential parties (n = 40) about researchers’ role in the ethical conduct of research through discourse analysis. Three discourses emerged: researchers as reflective practitioners, protectors of participants, and technicians. Understanding the commonalities and differences among the discourses may foster a shared and compelling institutional research culture.},
number = {0},
urldate = {2019-04-29},
journal = {Ethics \& Behavior},
author = {Cumyn, Annabelle and Ouellet, Kathleen and Côté, Anne-Marie and Francoeur, Caroline and St-Onge, Christina},
month = nov,
year = {2018},
keywords = {Journal Article, discourse analysis, ethical conduct of research, researchers},
pages = {1--16},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"8aPAHp8g3sM7FjAA5","bibbaseid":"cumyn-ouellet-ct-francoeur-stonge-roleofresearchersintheethicalconductofresearchadiscourseanalysisfromdifferentstakeholderperspectives-2018","author_short":["Cumyn, A.","Ouellet, K.","Côté, A.","Francoeur, C.","St-Onge, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: A discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives","volume":"0","issn":"1050-8422","shorttitle":"Role of Researchers in the Ethical Conduct of Research","url":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671","abstract":"The ethical conduct of research rests largely on researchers, and as such, an understanding of how they perceive and enact their role in research is paramount. However, the literature around ethics and research mostly focuses on researchers’ perception of Research Ethics Boards (REB; also known as Institutional Review Boards) roles and functions. To fill that gap, we analyzed the perceptions of researchers, REB members, and influential parties (n = 40) about researchers’ role in the ethical conduct of research through discourse analysis. Three discourses emerged: researchers as reflective practitioners, protectors of participants, and technicians. Understanding the commonalities and differences among the discourses may foster a shared and compelling institutional research culture.","number":"0","urldate":"2019-04-29","journal":"Ethics & Behavior","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cumyn"],"firstnames":["Annabelle"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ouellet"],"firstnames":["Kathleen"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Côté"],"firstnames":["Anne-Marie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Francoeur"],"firstnames":["Caroline"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["St-Onge"],"firstnames":["Christina"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2018","keywords":"Journal Article, discourse analysis, ethical conduct of research, researchers","pages":"1–16","bibtex":"@article{cumyn_role_2018,\n\ttitle = {Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: {A} discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives},\n\tvolume = {0},\n\tissn = {1050-8422},\n\tshorttitle = {Role of {Researchers} in the {Ethical} {Conduct} of {Research}},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671},\n\tabstract = {The ethical conduct of research rests largely on researchers, and as such, an understanding of how they perceive and enact their role in research is paramount. However, the literature around ethics and research mostly focuses on researchers’ perception of Research Ethics Boards (REB; also known as Institutional Review Boards) roles and functions. To fill that gap, we analyzed the perceptions of researchers, REB members, and influential parties (n = 40) about researchers’ role in the ethical conduct of research through discourse analysis. Three discourses emerged: researchers as reflective practitioners, protectors of participants, and technicians. Understanding the commonalities and differences among the discourses may foster a shared and compelling institutional research culture.},\n\tnumber = {0},\n\turldate = {2019-04-29},\n\tjournal = {Ethics \\& Behavior},\n\tauthor = {Cumyn, Annabelle and Ouellet, Kathleen and Côté, Anne-Marie and Francoeur, Caroline and St-Onge, Christina},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tkeywords = {Journal Article, discourse analysis, ethical conduct of research, researchers},\n\tpages = {1--16},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Cumyn, A.","Ouellet, K.","Côté, A.","Francoeur, C.","St-Onge, C."],"key":"cumyn_role_2018","id":"cumyn_role_2018","bibbaseid":"cumyn-ouellet-ct-francoeur-stonge-roleofresearchersintheethicalconductofresearchadiscourseanalysisfromdifferentstakeholderperspectives-2018","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671"},"keyword":["Journal Article","discourse analysis","ethical conduct of research","researchers"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2298129/items?key=Di2aUrSQXpXlWmYdUvNGDXyv&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["3byWrivAb63dcxozq"],"keywords":["journal article","discourse analysis","ethical conduct of research","researchers"],"search_terms":["role","researchers","ethical","conduct","research","discourse","analysis","different","stakeholder","perspectives","cumyn","ouellet","côté","francoeur","st-onge"],"title":"Role of researchers in the ethical conduct of research: A discourse analysis from different stakeholder perspectives","year":2018}