Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges. Curtis, J. R., Sathitratanacheewin, S., Starks, H., Lee, R. Y., Kross, E. K., Downey, L., Sibley, J., Lober, W., Loggers, E. T., Fausto, J. A., Lindvall, C., & Engelberg, R. A. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 21(S2):S52–S60, 2018. doi abstract bibtex BACKGROUND: As our population ages and the burden of chronic illness rises, there is increasing need to implement quality metrics that measure and benchmark care of the seriously ill, including the delivery of both primary care and specialty palliative care. Such metrics can be used to drive quality improvement, value-based payment, and accountability for population-based outcomes. METHODS: In this article, we examine use of the electronic health record (EHR) as a tool to assess quality of serious illness care through narrative review and description of a palliative care quality metrics program in a large healthcare system. RESULTS: In the search for feasible, reliable, and valid palliative care quality metrics, the EHR is an attractive option for collecting quality data on large numbers of seriously ill patients. However, important challenges to using EHR data for quality improvement and accountability exist, including understanding the validity, reliability, and completeness of the data, as well as acknowledging the difference between care documented and care delivered. Challenges also include developing achievable metrics that are clearly linked to patient and family outcomes and addressing data interoperability across sites as well as EHR platforms and vendors. This article summarizes the strengths and weakness of the EHR as a data source for accountability of community- and population-based programs for serious illness, describes the implementation of EHR data in the palliative care quality metrics program at the University of Washington, and, based on that experience, discusses opportunities and challenges. Our palliative care metrics program was designed to serve as a resource for other healthcare systems. DISCUSSION: Although the EHR offers great promise for enhancing quality of care provided for the seriously ill, significant challenges remain to operationalizing this promise on a national scale and using EHR data for population-based quality and accountability.
@article{curtis_using_2018,
title = {Using {Electronic} {Health} {Records} for {Quality} {Measurement} and {Accountability} in {Care} of the {Seriously} {Ill}: {Opportunities} and {Challenges}},
volume = {21},
issn = {1557-7740},
shorttitle = {Using {Electronic} {Health} {Records} for {Quality} {Measurement} and {Accountability} in {Care} of the {Seriously} {Ill}},
doi = {10.1089/jpm.2017.0542},
abstract = {BACKGROUND: As our population ages and the burden of chronic illness rises, there is increasing need to implement quality metrics that measure and benchmark care of the seriously ill, including the delivery of both primary care and specialty palliative care. Such metrics can be used to drive quality improvement, value-based payment, and accountability for population-based outcomes.
METHODS: In this article, we examine use of the electronic health record (EHR) as a tool to assess quality of serious illness care through narrative review and description of a palliative care quality metrics program in a large healthcare system.
RESULTS: In the search for feasible, reliable, and valid palliative care quality metrics, the EHR is an attractive option for collecting quality data on large numbers of seriously ill patients. However, important challenges to using EHR data for quality improvement and accountability exist, including understanding the validity, reliability, and completeness of the data, as well as acknowledging the difference between care documented and care delivered. Challenges also include developing achievable metrics that are clearly linked to patient and family outcomes and addressing data interoperability across sites as well as EHR platforms and vendors. This article summarizes the strengths and weakness of the EHR as a data source for accountability of community- and population-based programs for serious illness, describes the implementation of EHR data in the palliative care quality metrics program at the University of Washington, and, based on that experience, discusses opportunities and challenges. Our palliative care metrics program was designed to serve as a resource for other healthcare systems.
DISCUSSION: Although the EHR offers great promise for enhancing quality of care provided for the seriously ill, significant challenges remain to operationalizing this promise on a national scale and using EHR data for population-based quality and accountability.},
language = {eng},
number = {S2},
journal = {Journal of Palliative Medicine},
author = {Curtis, J. Randall and Sathitratanacheewin, Seelwan and Starks, Helene and Lee, Robert Y. and Kross, Erin K. and Downey, Lois and Sibley, James and Lober, William and Loggers, Elizabeth T. and Fausto, James A. and Lindvall, Charlotta and Engelberg, Ruth A.},
year = {2018},
pmid = {29182487},
pmcid = {PMC5756465},
keywords = {accountability in care, electronic health records, palliative care, quality metrics, seriously ill patient population},
pages = {S52--S60},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"y3uHi4TTogG8wJHZu","bibbaseid":"curtis-sathitratanacheewin-starks-lee-kross-downey-sibley-lober-etal-usingelectronichealthrecordsforqualitymeasurementandaccountabilityincareoftheseriouslyillopportunitiesandchallenges-2018","authorIDs":["5ahvADmrSQM9hB6GR","5e4dad89e671efde010001ce","5e4db40be671efde0100022d","5e4eabb964b624de01000132","5e4edda92962cadf010000e2","5e4f175ee5389bde010000b2","5e545f4a88d190df010000e6","5e54633f88d190df01000124","5e549c01fd5b13df010000d6","5e5706247840dfde010004f9","d7LZpxC5icGW3ttya","iRWrzJeT8tq5xr3RE"],"author_short":["Curtis, J. R.","Sathitratanacheewin, S.","Starks, H.","Lee, R. Y.","Kross, E. K.","Downey, L.","Sibley, J.","Lober, W.","Loggers, E. T.","Fausto, J. A.","Lindvall, C.","Engelberg, R. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges","volume":"21","issn":"1557-7740","shorttitle":"Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill","doi":"10.1089/jpm.2017.0542","abstract":"BACKGROUND: As our population ages and the burden of chronic illness rises, there is increasing need to implement quality metrics that measure and benchmark care of the seriously ill, including the delivery of both primary care and specialty palliative care. Such metrics can be used to drive quality improvement, value-based payment, and accountability for population-based outcomes. METHODS: In this article, we examine use of the electronic health record (EHR) as a tool to assess quality of serious illness care through narrative review and description of a palliative care quality metrics program in a large healthcare system. RESULTS: In the search for feasible, reliable, and valid palliative care quality metrics, the EHR is an attractive option for collecting quality data on large numbers of seriously ill patients. However, important challenges to using EHR data for quality improvement and accountability exist, including understanding the validity, reliability, and completeness of the data, as well as acknowledging the difference between care documented and care delivered. Challenges also include developing achievable metrics that are clearly linked to patient and family outcomes and addressing data interoperability across sites as well as EHR platforms and vendors. This article summarizes the strengths and weakness of the EHR as a data source for accountability of community- and population-based programs for serious illness, describes the implementation of EHR data in the palliative care quality metrics program at the University of Washington, and, based on that experience, discusses opportunities and challenges. Our palliative care metrics program was designed to serve as a resource for other healthcare systems. DISCUSSION: Although the EHR offers great promise for enhancing quality of care provided for the seriously ill, significant challenges remain to operationalizing this promise on a national scale and using EHR data for population-based quality and accountability.","language":"eng","number":"S2","journal":"Journal of Palliative Medicine","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Curtis"],"firstnames":["J.","Randall"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sathitratanacheewin"],"firstnames":["Seelwan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Starks"],"firstnames":["Helene"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lee"],"firstnames":["Robert","Y."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kross"],"firstnames":["Erin","K."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Downey"],"firstnames":["Lois"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sibley"],"firstnames":["James"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lober"],"firstnames":["William"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Loggers"],"firstnames":["Elizabeth","T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fausto"],"firstnames":["James","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lindvall"],"firstnames":["Charlotta"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Engelberg"],"firstnames":["Ruth","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2018","pmid":"29182487","pmcid":"PMC5756465","keywords":"accountability in care, electronic health records, palliative care, quality metrics, seriously ill patient population","pages":"S52–S60","bibtex":"@article{curtis_using_2018,\n\ttitle = {Using {Electronic} {Health} {Records} for {Quality} {Measurement} and {Accountability} in {Care} of the {Seriously} {Ill}: {Opportunities} and {Challenges}},\n\tvolume = {21},\n\tissn = {1557-7740},\n\tshorttitle = {Using {Electronic} {Health} {Records} for {Quality} {Measurement} and {Accountability} in {Care} of the {Seriously} {Ill}},\n\tdoi = {10.1089/jpm.2017.0542},\n\tabstract = {BACKGROUND: As our population ages and the burden of chronic illness rises, there is increasing need to implement quality metrics that measure and benchmark care of the seriously ill, including the delivery of both primary care and specialty palliative care. Such metrics can be used to drive quality improvement, value-based payment, and accountability for population-based outcomes.\nMETHODS: In this article, we examine use of the electronic health record (EHR) as a tool to assess quality of serious illness care through narrative review and description of a palliative care quality metrics program in a large healthcare system.\nRESULTS: In the search for feasible, reliable, and valid palliative care quality metrics, the EHR is an attractive option for collecting quality data on large numbers of seriously ill patients. However, important challenges to using EHR data for quality improvement and accountability exist, including understanding the validity, reliability, and completeness of the data, as well as acknowledging the difference between care documented and care delivered. Challenges also include developing achievable metrics that are clearly linked to patient and family outcomes and addressing data interoperability across sites as well as EHR platforms and vendors. This article summarizes the strengths and weakness of the EHR as a data source for accountability of community- and population-based programs for serious illness, describes the implementation of EHR data in the palliative care quality metrics program at the University of Washington, and, based on that experience, discusses opportunities and challenges. Our palliative care metrics program was designed to serve as a resource for other healthcare systems.\nDISCUSSION: Although the EHR offers great promise for enhancing quality of care provided for the seriously ill, significant challenges remain to operationalizing this promise on a national scale and using EHR data for population-based quality and accountability.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {S2},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Palliative Medicine},\n\tauthor = {Curtis, J. Randall and Sathitratanacheewin, Seelwan and Starks, Helene and Lee, Robert Y. and Kross, Erin K. and Downey, Lois and Sibley, James and Lober, William and Loggers, Elizabeth T. and Fausto, James A. and Lindvall, Charlotta and Engelberg, Ruth A.},\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpmid = {29182487},\n\tpmcid = {PMC5756465},\n\tkeywords = {accountability in care, electronic health records, palliative care, quality metrics, seriously ill patient population},\n\tpages = {S52--S60},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Curtis, J. R.","Sathitratanacheewin, S.","Starks, H.","Lee, R. Y.","Kross, E. K.","Downey, L.","Sibley, J.","Lober, W.","Loggers, E. T.","Fausto, J. A.","Lindvall, C.","Engelberg, R. A."],"key":"curtis_using_2018","id":"curtis_using_2018","bibbaseid":"curtis-sathitratanacheewin-starks-lee-kross-downey-sibley-lober-etal-usingelectronichealthrecordsforqualitymeasurementandaccountabilityincareoftheseriouslyillopportunitiesandchallenges-2018","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["accountability in care","electronic health records","palliative care","quality metrics","seriously ill patient population"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{"lober, w":"https://cirg.uw.edu/pubs/clinical-info-publications.html"}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2451541/items?key=ETxlqY6gstXyHoIDbJCT8yVh&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2020-01-20T19:50:12.882Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["accountability in care","electronic health records","palliative care","quality metrics","seriously ill patient population"],"search_terms":["using","electronic","health","records","quality","measurement","accountability","care","seriously","ill","opportunities","challenges","curtis","sathitratanacheewin","starks","lee","kross","downey","sibley","lober","loggers","fausto","lindvall","engelberg"],"title":"Using Electronic Health Records for Quality Measurement and Accountability in Care of the Seriously Ill: Opportunities and Challenges","year":2018,"dataSources":["K7F7TwXAn7H3rFsQm","oyZZRPQiHJgh2bdsq"]}