Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map. Daigneault, P. Evaluation and Program Planning. ![Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Stakeholder participation and evaluation use have attracted a lot of attention from practitioners, theorists and researchers. A common hypothesis is that participation is positively associated with evaluation use. Whereas the number of empirical studies conducted on this topic is impressive, quantitative research has held a minority position within this scientific production. This study mobilizes systematic review methods to ‘map’ the empirical literature that has quantitatively studied participation and use. The goal is to take stock and assess the strength of evidence of this body of work (but not to synthesize the findings) and, based on this assessment, to provide directions for future research.
@article{daigneault_taking_????,
title = {Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: {A} systematic map},
issn = {0149-7189},
shorttitle = {Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000421},
doi = {10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.003},
abstract = {Stakeholder participation and evaluation use have attracted a lot of attention from practitioners, theorists and researchers. A common hypothesis is that participation is positively associated with evaluation use. Whereas the number of empirical studies conducted on this topic is impressive, quantitative research has held a minority position within this scientific production. This study mobilizes systematic review methods to ‘map’ the empirical literature that has quantitatively studied participation and use. The goal is to take stock and assess the strength of evidence of this body of work (but not to synthesize the findings) and, based on this assessment, to provide directions for future research.},
urldate = {2014-05-05},
journal = {Evaluation and Program Planning},
author = {Daigneault, Pierre-Marc},
keywords = {collaborative inquiry, evaluation influence., Evaluation use, Participatory evaluation, research on evaluation, scoping study, Stakeholder involvement, stakeholder participation, Systematic Review},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/49044/Daigneault - Taking stock of four decades of quantitative resea.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/49045/S0149718914000421.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"CGfyq4kHmt6jskC39","bibbaseid":"daigneault-takingstockoffourdecadesofquantitativeresearchonstakeholderparticipationandevaluationuseasystematicmap","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:33.305Z","title":"Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map","author_short":["Daigneault, P."],"year":null,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: A systematic map","issn":"0149-7189","shorttitle":"Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000421","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.003","abstract":"Stakeholder participation and evaluation use have attracted a lot of attention from practitioners, theorists and researchers. A common hypothesis is that participation is positively associated with evaluation use. Whereas the number of empirical studies conducted on this topic is impressive, quantitative research has held a minority position within this scientific production. This study mobilizes systematic review methods to ‘map’ the empirical literature that has quantitatively studied participation and use. The goal is to take stock and assess the strength of evidence of this body of work (but not to synthesize the findings) and, based on this assessment, to provide directions for future research.","urldate":"2014-05-05","journal":"Evaluation and Program Planning","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Daigneault"],"firstnames":["Pierre-Marc"],"suffixes":[]}],"keywords":"collaborative inquiry, evaluation influence., Evaluation use, Participatory evaluation, research on evaluation, scoping study, Stakeholder involvement, stakeholder participation, Systematic Review","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/49044/Daigneault - Taking stock of four decades of quantitative resea.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/49045/S0149718914000421.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{daigneault_taking_????,\n\ttitle = {Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use: {A} systematic map},\n\tissn = {0149-7189},\n\tshorttitle = {Taking stock of four decades of quantitative research on stakeholder participation and evaluation use},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000421},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.003},\n\tabstract = {Stakeholder participation and evaluation use have attracted a lot of attention from practitioners, theorists and researchers. A common hypothesis is that participation is positively associated with evaluation use. Whereas the number of empirical studies conducted on this topic is impressive, quantitative research has held a minority position within this scientific production. This study mobilizes systematic review methods to ‘map’ the empirical literature that has quantitatively studied participation and use. The goal is to take stock and assess the strength of evidence of this body of work (but not to synthesize the findings) and, based on this assessment, to provide directions for future research.},\n\turldate = {2014-05-05},\n\tjournal = {Evaluation and Program Planning},\n\tauthor = {Daigneault, Pierre-Marc},\n\tkeywords = {collaborative inquiry, evaluation influence., Evaluation use, Participatory evaluation, research on evaluation, scoping study, Stakeholder involvement, stakeholder participation, Systematic Review},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/49044/Daigneault - Taking stock of four decades of quantitative resea.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/49045/S0149718914000421.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Daigneault, P."],"key":"daigneault_taking_????","id":"daigneault_taking_????","bibbaseid":"daigneault-takingstockoffourdecadesofquantitativeresearchonstakeholderparticipationandevaluationuseasystematicmap","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718914000421"},"keyword":["collaborative inquiry","evaluation influence.","Evaluation use","Participatory evaluation","research on evaluation","scoping study","Stakeholder involvement","stakeholder participation","Systematic Review"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["taking","stock","four","decades","quantitative","research","stakeholder","participation","evaluation","use","systematic","map","daigneault"],"keywords":["collaborative inquiry","evaluation influence.","evaluation use","participatory evaluation","research on evaluation","scoping study","stakeholder involvement","stakeholder participation","systematic review"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}