Jean-Claude Gardin on Archaeological Data, Representation and Knowledge: Implications for Digital Archaeology. Dallas, C. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23(1):305–330, March, 2016. 🏷️ /unread
Paper doi abstract bibtex This paper presents Jean-Claude Gardin’s distinctive approach to archaeological data, representation and knowledge in the context of his early engagement with semiotics and structural semantics and his grounding in fields as diverse as documentation, classification theory, material culture studies, argumentation theory and the philosophy of the human sciences. Pointing at Gardin’s ambivalence vis-à-vis the promises of automated classification and machine reasoning in archaeology, it shows that his approach goes beyond a normative, positivist conception of archaeological research, recognizing the contextual, theory-laden nature of archaeological data constitution, the priority of focusing on actual archaeological interpretation practices and the complementarity between narrative and formal representations of archaeological reasoning. It connects his early development of archaeological descriptive and typological metalanguages with his later elaboration of a theoretically informed approach to archaeological argumentation, analysis and publication, situates his logicist programme as a relevant contribution to the development of an archaeological “theory of practice”, grounded on reflexivity and modesty vis-à-vis the possibility of knowledge and the limits of scientism, and highlights aspects of Gardin’s work that point to potentially fruitful directions for contemporary research and practice in the field of archaeological informatics and digital humanities communication. 【摘要翻译】本文介绍了让-克洛德-加尔丹(Jean-Claude Gardin)处理考古数据、表征和知识的独特方法,包括他早期对符号学和结构语义学的研究,以及他在文献学、分类理论、物质文化研究、论证理论和人文科学哲学等不同领域的基础。该书指出了加尔丁对考古学中自动分类和机器推理的矛盾态度,表明他的研究方法超越了考古学研究的规范性和实证主义概念,认识到考古学数据构成的语境和理论性质,关注实际考古解释实践的优先性,以及考古推理的叙事和形式表述之间的互补性。该书将加尔丁早期对考古学描述和类型学金属语言的发展与他后来对考古学论证、分析和出版的理论方法的阐述联系起来,将他的逻辑学方案定位为对考古学 "实践理论 "发展的相关贡献,其基础是对知识可能性和科学主义局限性的反思性和谦逊性,并强调了加尔丁工作的各个方面,这些方面为考古信息学和数字人文交流领域的当代研究和实践指出了可能富有成果的方向。
@article{dallas2016,
title = {Jean-{Claude} {Gardin} on {Archaeological} {Data}, {Representation} and {Knowledge}: {Implications} for {Digital} {Archaeology}},
volume = {23},
issn = {1573-7764},
shorttitle = {让-克洛德-加尔丁({Jean}-{Claude} {Gardin})谈考古数据、表征和知识:数字考古学的意义},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3},
doi = {10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3},
abstract = {This paper presents Jean-Claude Gardin’s distinctive approach to archaeological data, representation and knowledge in the context of his early engagement with semiotics and structural semantics and his grounding in fields as diverse as documentation, classification theory, material culture studies, argumentation theory and the philosophy of the human sciences. Pointing at Gardin’s ambivalence vis-à-vis the promises of automated classification and machine reasoning in archaeology, it shows that his approach goes beyond a normative, positivist conception of archaeological research, recognizing the contextual, theory-laden nature of archaeological data constitution, the priority of focusing on actual archaeological interpretation practices and the complementarity between narrative and formal representations of archaeological reasoning. It connects his early development of archaeological descriptive and typological metalanguages with his later elaboration of a theoretically informed approach to archaeological argumentation, analysis and publication, situates his logicist programme as a relevant contribution to the development of an archaeological “theory of practice”, grounded on reflexivity and modesty vis-à-vis the possibility of knowledge and the limits of scientism, and highlights aspects of Gardin’s work that point to potentially fruitful directions for contemporary research and practice in the field of archaeological informatics and digital humanities communication.
【摘要翻译】本文介绍了让-克洛德-加尔丹(Jean-Claude Gardin)处理考古数据、表征和知识的独特方法,包括他早期对符号学和结构语义学的研究,以及他在文献学、分类理论、物质文化研究、论证理论和人文科学哲学等不同领域的基础。该书指出了加尔丁对考古学中自动分类和机器推理的矛盾态度,表明他的研究方法超越了考古学研究的规范性和实证主义概念,认识到考古学数据构成的语境和理论性质,关注实际考古解释实践的优先性,以及考古推理的叙事和形式表述之间的互补性。该书将加尔丁早期对考古学描述和类型学金属语言的发展与他后来对考古学论证、分析和出版的理论方法的阐述联系起来,将他的逻辑学方案定位为对考古学 "实践理论 "发展的相关贡献,其基础是对知识可能性和科学主义局限性的反思性和谦逊性,并强调了加尔丁工作的各个方面,这些方面为考古信息学和数字人文交流领域的当代研究和实践指出了可能富有成果的方向。},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2020-06-12},
journal = {Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory},
author = {Dallas, Costis},
month = mar,
year = {2016},
note = {🏷️ /unread},
keywords = {/unread},
pages = {305--330},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"7xYqkf5v6svKgYstY","bibbaseid":"dallas-jeanclaudegardinonarchaeologicaldatarepresentationandknowledgeimplicationsfordigitalarchaeology-2016","author_short":["Dallas, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Jean-Claude Gardin on Archaeological Data, Representation and Knowledge: Implications for Digital Archaeology","volume":"23","issn":"1573-7764","shorttitle":"让-克洛德-加尔丁(Jean-Claude Gardin)谈考古数据、表征和知识:数字考古学的意义","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3","doi":"10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3","abstract":"This paper presents Jean-Claude Gardin’s distinctive approach to archaeological data, representation and knowledge in the context of his early engagement with semiotics and structural semantics and his grounding in fields as diverse as documentation, classification theory, material culture studies, argumentation theory and the philosophy of the human sciences. Pointing at Gardin’s ambivalence vis-à-vis the promises of automated classification and machine reasoning in archaeology, it shows that his approach goes beyond a normative, positivist conception of archaeological research, recognizing the contextual, theory-laden nature of archaeological data constitution, the priority of focusing on actual archaeological interpretation practices and the complementarity between narrative and formal representations of archaeological reasoning. It connects his early development of archaeological descriptive and typological metalanguages with his later elaboration of a theoretically informed approach to archaeological argumentation, analysis and publication, situates his logicist programme as a relevant contribution to the development of an archaeological “theory of practice”, grounded on reflexivity and modesty vis-à-vis the possibility of knowledge and the limits of scientism, and highlights aspects of Gardin’s work that point to potentially fruitful directions for contemporary research and practice in the field of archaeological informatics and digital humanities communication. 【摘要翻译】本文介绍了让-克洛德-加尔丹(Jean-Claude Gardin)处理考古数据、表征和知识的独特方法,包括他早期对符号学和结构语义学的研究,以及他在文献学、分类理论、物质文化研究、论证理论和人文科学哲学等不同领域的基础。该书指出了加尔丁对考古学中自动分类和机器推理的矛盾态度,表明他的研究方法超越了考古学研究的规范性和实证主义概念,认识到考古学数据构成的语境和理论性质,关注实际考古解释实践的优先性,以及考古推理的叙事和形式表述之间的互补性。该书将加尔丁早期对考古学描述和类型学金属语言的发展与他后来对考古学论证、分析和出版的理论方法的阐述联系起来,将他的逻辑学方案定位为对考古学 \"实践理论 \"发展的相关贡献,其基础是对知识可能性和科学主义局限性的反思性和谦逊性,并强调了加尔丁工作的各个方面,这些方面为考古信息学和数字人文交流领域的当代研究和实践指出了可能富有成果的方向。","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2020-06-12","journal":"Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dallas"],"firstnames":["Costis"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2016","note":"🏷️ /unread","keywords":"/unread","pages":"305–330","bibtex":"@article{dallas2016,\n\ttitle = {Jean-{Claude} {Gardin} on {Archaeological} {Data}, {Representation} and {Knowledge}: {Implications} for {Digital} {Archaeology}},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tissn = {1573-7764},\n\tshorttitle = {让-克洛德-加尔丁({Jean}-{Claude} {Gardin})谈考古数据、表征和知识:数字考古学的意义},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3},\n\tabstract = {This paper presents Jean-Claude Gardin’s distinctive approach to archaeological data, representation and knowledge in the context of his early engagement with semiotics and structural semantics and his grounding in fields as diverse as documentation, classification theory, material culture studies, argumentation theory and the philosophy of the human sciences. Pointing at Gardin’s ambivalence vis-à-vis the promises of automated classification and machine reasoning in archaeology, it shows that his approach goes beyond a normative, positivist conception of archaeological research, recognizing the contextual, theory-laden nature of archaeological data constitution, the priority of focusing on actual archaeological interpretation practices and the complementarity between narrative and formal representations of archaeological reasoning. It connects his early development of archaeological descriptive and typological metalanguages with his later elaboration of a theoretically informed approach to archaeological argumentation, analysis and publication, situates his logicist programme as a relevant contribution to the development of an archaeological “theory of practice”, grounded on reflexivity and modesty vis-à-vis the possibility of knowledge and the limits of scientism, and highlights aspects of Gardin’s work that point to potentially fruitful directions for contemporary research and practice in the field of archaeological informatics and digital humanities communication.\n\n【摘要翻译】本文介绍了让-克洛德-加尔丹(Jean-Claude Gardin)处理考古数据、表征和知识的独特方法,包括他早期对符号学和结构语义学的研究,以及他在文献学、分类理论、物质文化研究、论证理论和人文科学哲学等不同领域的基础。该书指出了加尔丁对考古学中自动分类和机器推理的矛盾态度,表明他的研究方法超越了考古学研究的规范性和实证主义概念,认识到考古学数据构成的语境和理论性质,关注实际考古解释实践的优先性,以及考古推理的叙事和形式表述之间的互补性。该书将加尔丁早期对考古学描述和类型学金属语言的发展与他后来对考古学论证、分析和出版的理论方法的阐述联系起来,将他的逻辑学方案定位为对考古学 \"实践理论 \"发展的相关贡献,其基础是对知识可能性和科学主义局限性的反思性和谦逊性,并强调了加尔丁工作的各个方面,这些方面为考古信息学和数字人文交流领域的当代研究和实践指出了可能富有成果的方向。},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2020-06-12},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory},\n\tauthor = {Dallas, Costis},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread},\n\tkeywords = {/unread},\n\tpages = {305--330},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Dallas, C."],"key":"dallas2016","id":"dallas2016","bibbaseid":"dallas-jeanclaudegardinonarchaeologicaldatarepresentationandknowledgeimplicationsfordigitalarchaeology-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-015-9241-3"},"keyword":["/unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/Y3QIGY5X/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["iC76hZbMPQr3su9Sj"],"keywords":["/unread"],"search_terms":["jean","claude","gardin","archaeological","data","representation","knowledge","implications","digital","archaeology","dallas"],"title":"Jean-Claude Gardin on Archaeological Data, Representation and Knowledge: Implications for Digital Archaeology","year":2016}