@misc{dapollonia_controverses_2014,
	title = {Les controverses climatiques: une analyse socioépistémique},
	shorttitle = {Les controverses climatiques},
	url = {http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/2.1.1399.0401},
	doi = {10.13140/2.1.1399.0401},
	abstract = {This PhD dissertation sets out to analyze, in a socioepistemic way, the various controversies relating to global warming. This work is based on two objectives: (1) to develop and test a reflective analysis tool developed as an ongoing investigation in a single analytical framework articulating existing and occasionally controversial frameworks. (2) To analyze actors’ strategies and arguments in the different areas of mediation concerning controversial climate system of knowledge, regarding the understanding to disentangle epistemological and axiological dimensions. This thesis is based on a bibliometric work to build a socio-historical reconstruction of the main controversial elements from the eighteenth century to the present time. Following this epistemological basis the analysis progresses in three steps. The first is an analysis based on a researcher’s corpus (climatologists or otherwise) in various situation of communication, secondly completed by inquiry detailed survey with individual and collective interviews and finally a sociolinguistic analysis. Only then does it become possible to provide a radiography of global warming controversies restoring the part we can see, the In and the Off, to unravel the ontological, epistemological and axiological dimensions.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2024-09-17},
	publisher = {Unpublished},
	author = {D'Apollonia, Lionel Scotto},
	year = {2014},
}

{"_id":"KJcGoLd45wJNizqtz","bibbaseid":"dapollonia-lescontroversesclimatiquesuneanalysesociopistmique-2014","author_short":["D'Apollonia, L. S."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"Les controverses climatiques: une analyse socioépistémique","shorttitle":"Les controverses climatiques","url":"http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/2.1.1399.0401","doi":"10.13140/2.1.1399.0401","abstract":"This PhD dissertation sets out to analyze, in a socioepistemic way, the various controversies relating to global warming. This work is based on two objectives: (1) to develop and test a reflective analysis tool developed as an ongoing investigation in a single analytical framework articulating existing and occasionally controversial frameworks. (2) To analyze actors’ strategies and arguments in the different areas of mediation concerning controversial climate system of knowledge, regarding the understanding to disentangle epistemological and axiological dimensions. This thesis is based on a bibliometric work to build a socio-historical reconstruction of the main controversial elements from the eighteenth century to the present time. Following this epistemological basis the analysis progresses in three steps. The first is an analysis based on a researcher’s corpus (climatologists or otherwise) in various situation of communication, secondly completed by inquiry detailed survey with individual and collective interviews and finally a sociolinguistic analysis. Only then does it become possible to provide a radiography of global warming controversies restoring the part we can see, the In and the Off, to unravel the ontological, epistemological and axiological dimensions.","language":"en","urldate":"2024-09-17","publisher":"Unpublished","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["D'Apollonia"],"firstnames":["Lionel","Scotto"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2014","bibtex":"@misc{dapollonia_controverses_2014,\n\ttitle = {Les controverses climatiques: une analyse socioépistémique},\n\tshorttitle = {Les controverses climatiques},\n\turl = {http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/2.1.1399.0401},\n\tdoi = {10.13140/2.1.1399.0401},\n\tabstract = {This PhD dissertation sets out to analyze, in a socioepistemic way, the various controversies relating to global warming. This work is based on two objectives: (1) to develop and test a reflective analysis tool developed as an ongoing investigation in a single analytical framework articulating existing and occasionally controversial frameworks. (2) To analyze actors’ strategies and arguments in the different areas of mediation concerning controversial climate system of knowledge, regarding the understanding to disentangle epistemological and axiological dimensions. This thesis is based on a bibliometric work to build a socio-historical reconstruction of the main controversial elements from the eighteenth century to the present time. Following this epistemological basis the analysis progresses in three steps. The first is an analysis based on a researcher’s corpus (climatologists or otherwise) in various situation of communication, secondly completed by inquiry detailed survey with individual and collective interviews and finally a sociolinguistic analysis. Only then does it become possible to provide a radiography of global warming controversies restoring the part we can see, the In and the Off, to unravel the ontological, epistemological and axiological dimensions.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2024-09-17},\n\tpublisher = {Unpublished},\n\tauthor = {D'Apollonia, Lionel Scotto},\n\tyear = {2014},\n}\n\n","author_short":["D'Apollonia, L. S."],"key":"dapollonia_controverses_2014","id":"dapollonia_controverses_2014","bibbaseid":"dapollonia-lescontroversesclimatiquesuneanalysesociopistmique-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://rgdoi.net/10.13140/2.1.1399.0401"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/1340424/items?key=cRN9nOxfOS9RcEg6ioSHlbD8&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","5XkfmA9xajmKjWGio","LLWHhkSQN6iBQNqez"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["les","controverses","climatiques","une","analyse","socio","pist","mique","d'apollonia"],"title":"Les controverses climatiques: une analyse socioépistémique","year":2014}