Assessing Nature's Contributions to People. D́ıaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Mart́ın-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., Bukvareva, E., Davies, K., Demissew, S., Erpul, G., Failler, P., Guerra, C. A., Hewitt, C. L., Keune, H., Lindley, S., & Shirayama, Y. 359(6373):270–272.
Assessing Nature's Contributions to People [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
A major challenge today and into the future is to maintain or enhance beneficial contributions of nature to a good quality of life for all people. This is among the key motivations of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), a joint global effort by governments, academia, and civil society to assess and promote knowledge of Earth's biodiversity and ecosystems and their contribution to human societies in order to inform policy formulation. One of the more recent key elements of the IPBES conceptual framework (1) is the notion of nature's contributions to people (NCP), which builds on the ecosystem service concept popularized by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2). But as we detail below, NCP as defined and put into practice in IPBES differs from earlier work in several important ways. First, the NCP approach recognizes the central and pervasive role that culture plays in defining all links between people and nature. Second, use of NCP elevates, emphasizes, and operationalizes the role of indigenous and local knowledge in understanding nature's contribution to people. [Excerpt] The broad remit of IPBES requires it to engage a wide range of stakeholders, spanning from natural, social, humanistic, and engineering sciences to indigenous peoples and local communities in whose territories lie much of the world's biodiversity. Being an intergovernmental body, such inclusiveness is essential not only for advancing knowledge but also for the political legitimacy of assessment findings [...]
@article{diazAssessingNatureContributions2018a,
  title = {Assessing Nature's Contributions to People},
  author = {D́ıaz, Sandra and Pascual, Unai and Stenseke, Marie and Mart́ın-López, Berta and Watson, Robert T. and Molnár, Zsolt and Hill, Rosemary and Chan, Kai M. A. and Baste, Ivar A. and Brauman, Kate A. and Polasky, Stephen and Church, Andrew and Lonsdale, Mark and Larigauderie, Anne and Leadley, Paul W. and van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E. and van der Plaat, Felice and Schröter, Matthias and Lavorel, Sandra and Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Yildiz and Bukvareva, Elena and Davies, Kirsten and Demissew, Sebsebe and Erpul, Gunay and Failler, Pierre and Guerra, Carlos A. and Hewitt, Chad L. and Keune, Hans and Lindley, Sarah and Shirayama, Yoshihisa},
  date = {2018-01},
  journaltitle = {Science},
  volume = {359},
  pages = {270--272},
  issn = {0036-8075},
  doi = {10.1126/science.aap8826},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826},
  abstract = {A major challenge today and into the future is to maintain or enhance beneficial contributions of nature to a good quality of life for all people. This is among the key motivations of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), a joint global effort by governments, academia, and civil society to assess and promote knowledge of Earth's biodiversity and ecosystems and their contribution to human societies in order to inform policy formulation. One of the more recent key elements of the IPBES conceptual framework (1) is the notion of nature's contributions to people (NCP), which builds on the ecosystem service concept popularized by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2). But as we detail below, NCP as defined and put into practice in IPBES differs from earlier work in several important ways. First, the NCP approach recognizes the central and pervasive role that culture plays in defining all links between people and nature. Second, use of NCP elevates, emphasizes, and operationalizes the role of indigenous and local knowledge in understanding nature's contribution to people.

[Excerpt] The broad remit of IPBES requires it to engage a wide range of stakeholders, spanning from natural, social, humanistic, and engineering sciences to indigenous peoples and local communities in whose territories lie much of the world's biodiversity. Being an intergovernmental body, such inclusiveness is essential not only for advancing knowledge but also for the political legitimacy of assessment findings [...]},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,*moved-to-new-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-14612052,controversial-monetarisation,cultural-services,ecosystem-services,integrated-natural-resources-modelling-and-management,integration-techniques,multi-criteria-decision-analysis,multi-stakeholder-decision-making,multiplicity,nature-contributions-to-people,participatory-modelling,values-vs-scientific-evidence},
  number = {6373},
  options = {useprefix=true}
}
Downloads: 0
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021