Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera. De Klerk, A., Swanepoel, P., Lourens, R., Zondo, M., Abodunran, I., Lytras, S., MacLean, O. A., Robertson, D., Kosakovsky Pond, S. L., Zehr, J. D., Kumar, V., Stanhope, M. J., Harkins, G., Murrell, B., & Martin, D. P. Virus Evolution, 8(2):veac054, Oxford Academic, sep, 2022. Paper doi abstract bibtex 4 downloads Recombination contributes to the genetic diversity found in coronaviruses and is known to be a prominent mechanism whereby they evolve. It is apparent, both from controlled experiments and in genome sequences sampled from nature, that patterns of recombination in coronaviruses are non-random and that this is likely attributable to a combination of sequence features that favour the occurrence of recombination break points at specific genomic sites, and selection disfavouring the survival of recombinants within which favourable intra-genome interactions have been disrupted. Here we leverage available whole-genome sequence data for six coronavirus subgenera to identify specific patterns of recombination that are conserved between multiple subgenera and then identify the likely factors that underlie these conserved patterns. Specifically, we confirm the non-randomness of recombination break points across all six tested coronavirus subgenera, locate conserved recombination hot- and cold-spots, and determine that the locations of transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of conserved recombination break-point hotspot locations. We find that while the locations of recombination break points are not uniformly associated with degrees of nucleotide sequence conservation, they display significant tendencies in multiple coronavirus subgenera to occur in low guanine-cytosine content genome regions, in non-coding regions, at the edges of genes, and at sites within the Spike gene that are predicted to be minimally disruptive of Spike protein folding. While it is apparent that sequence features such as transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of where the template-switching events that yield recombination break points most commonly occur, it is evident that selection against misfolded recombinant proteins also strongly impacts observable recombination break-point distributions in coronavirus genomes sampled from nature.
@article{DeKlerk2022,
abstract = {Recombination contributes to the genetic diversity found in coronaviruses and is known to be a prominent mechanism whereby they evolve. It is apparent, both from controlled experiments and in genome sequences sampled from nature, that patterns of recombination in coronaviruses are non-random and that this is likely attributable to a combination of sequence features that favour the occurrence of recombination break points at specific genomic sites, and selection disfavouring the survival of recombinants within which favourable intra-genome interactions have been disrupted. Here we leverage available whole-genome sequence data for six coronavirus subgenera to identify specific patterns of recombination that are conserved between multiple subgenera and then identify the likely factors that underlie these conserved patterns. Specifically, we confirm the non-randomness of recombination break points across all six tested coronavirus subgenera, locate conserved recombination hot- and cold-spots, and determine that the locations of transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of conserved recombination break-point hotspot locations. We find that while the locations of recombination break points are not uniformly associated with degrees of nucleotide sequence conservation, they display significant tendencies in multiple coronavirus subgenera to occur in low guanine-cytosine content genome regions, in non-coding regions, at the edges of genes, and at sites within the Spike gene that are predicted to be minimally disruptive of Spike protein folding. While it is apparent that sequence features such as transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of where the template-switching events that yield recombination break points most commonly occur, it is evident that selection against misfolded recombinant proteins also strongly impacts observable recombination break-point distributions in coronavirus genomes sampled from nature.},
author = {{De Klerk}, Arne and Swanepoel, Phillip and Lourens, Rentia and Zondo, Mpumelelo and Abodunran, Isaac and Lytras, Spyros and MacLean, Oscar A. and Robertson, David and {Kosakovsky Pond}, Sergei L. and Zehr, Jordan D. and Kumar, Venkatesh and Stanhope, Michael J. and Harkins, Gordon and Murrell, Ben and Martin, Darren P.},
doi = {10.1093/VE/VEAC054},
file = {:C$\backslash$:/Users/01462563/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/De Klerk et al. - 2022 - Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera.pdf:pdf},
issn = {20571577},
journal = {Virus Evolution},
keywords = {Coronavirus,Evolution,OA,Phylogenetics,Recombination,Selection,genomics{\_}fund{\_}ack,original},
mendeley-tags = {OA,genomics{\_}fund{\_}ack,original},
month = {sep},
number = {2},
pages = {veac054},
pmid = {35814334},
publisher = {Oxford Academic},
title = {{Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera}},
url = {https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/8/2/veac054/6608204},
volume = {8},
year = {2022}
}
Downloads: 4
{"_id":"kvfsdHNDpX9jiaFaT","bibbaseid":"deklerk-swanepoel-lourens-zondo-abodunran-lytras-maclean-robertson-etal-conservedrecombinationpatternsacrosscoronavirussubgenera-2022","author_short":["De Klerk, A.","Swanepoel, P.","Lourens, R.","Zondo, M.","Abodunran, I.","Lytras, S.","MacLean, O. A.","Robertson, D.","Kosakovsky Pond, S. L.","Zehr, J. D.","Kumar, V.","Stanhope, M. J.","Harkins, G.","Murrell, B.","Martin, D. P."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"Recombination contributes to the genetic diversity found in coronaviruses and is known to be a prominent mechanism whereby they evolve. It is apparent, both from controlled experiments and in genome sequences sampled from nature, that patterns of recombination in coronaviruses are non-random and that this is likely attributable to a combination of sequence features that favour the occurrence of recombination break points at specific genomic sites, and selection disfavouring the survival of recombinants within which favourable intra-genome interactions have been disrupted. Here we leverage available whole-genome sequence data for six coronavirus subgenera to identify specific patterns of recombination that are conserved between multiple subgenera and then identify the likely factors that underlie these conserved patterns. Specifically, we confirm the non-randomness of recombination break points across all six tested coronavirus subgenera, locate conserved recombination hot- and cold-spots, and determine that the locations of transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of conserved recombination break-point hotspot locations. We find that while the locations of recombination break points are not uniformly associated with degrees of nucleotide sequence conservation, they display significant tendencies in multiple coronavirus subgenera to occur in low guanine-cytosine content genome regions, in non-coding regions, at the edges of genes, and at sites within the Spike gene that are predicted to be minimally disruptive of Spike protein folding. While it is apparent that sequence features such as transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of where the template-switching events that yield recombination break points most commonly occur, it is evident that selection against misfolded recombinant proteins also strongly impacts observable recombination break-point distributions in coronavirus genomes sampled from nature.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["De Klerk"],"firstnames":["Arne"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Swanepoel"],"firstnames":["Phillip"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lourens"],"firstnames":["Rentia"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zondo"],"firstnames":["Mpumelelo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Abodunran"],"firstnames":["Isaac"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lytras"],"firstnames":["Spyros"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["MacLean"],"firstnames":["Oscar","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Robertson"],"firstnames":["David"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kosakovsky Pond"],"firstnames":["Sergei","L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zehr"],"firstnames":["Jordan","D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kumar"],"firstnames":["Venkatesh"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Stanhope"],"firstnames":["Michael","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Harkins"],"firstnames":["Gordon"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Murrell"],"firstnames":["Ben"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Martin"],"firstnames":["Darren","P."],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1093/VE/VEAC054","file":":C$\\$:/Users/01462563/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/De Klerk et al. - 2022 - Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera.pdf:pdf","issn":"20571577","journal":"Virus Evolution","keywords":"Coronavirus,Evolution,OA,Phylogenetics,Recombination,Selection,genomics_fund_ack,original","mendeley-tags":"OA,genomics_fund_ack,original","month":"sep","number":"2","pages":"veac054","pmid":"35814334","publisher":"Oxford Academic","title":"Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera","url":"https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/8/2/veac054/6608204","volume":"8","year":"2022","bibtex":"@article{DeKlerk2022,\r\nabstract = {Recombination contributes to the genetic diversity found in coronaviruses and is known to be a prominent mechanism whereby they evolve. It is apparent, both from controlled experiments and in genome sequences sampled from nature, that patterns of recombination in coronaviruses are non-random and that this is likely attributable to a combination of sequence features that favour the occurrence of recombination break points at specific genomic sites, and selection disfavouring the survival of recombinants within which favourable intra-genome interactions have been disrupted. Here we leverage available whole-genome sequence data for six coronavirus subgenera to identify specific patterns of recombination that are conserved between multiple subgenera and then identify the likely factors that underlie these conserved patterns. Specifically, we confirm the non-randomness of recombination break points across all six tested coronavirus subgenera, locate conserved recombination hot- and cold-spots, and determine that the locations of transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of conserved recombination break-point hotspot locations. We find that while the locations of recombination break points are not uniformly associated with degrees of nucleotide sequence conservation, they display significant tendencies in multiple coronavirus subgenera to occur in low guanine-cytosine content genome regions, in non-coding regions, at the edges of genes, and at sites within the Spike gene that are predicted to be minimally disruptive of Spike protein folding. While it is apparent that sequence features such as transcriptional regulatory sequences are likely major determinants of where the template-switching events that yield recombination break points most commonly occur, it is evident that selection against misfolded recombinant proteins also strongly impacts observable recombination break-point distributions in coronavirus genomes sampled from nature.},\r\nauthor = {{De Klerk}, Arne and Swanepoel, Phillip and Lourens, Rentia and Zondo, Mpumelelo and Abodunran, Isaac and Lytras, Spyros and MacLean, Oscar A. and Robertson, David and {Kosakovsky Pond}, Sergei L. and Zehr, Jordan D. and Kumar, Venkatesh and Stanhope, Michael J. and Harkins, Gordon and Murrell, Ben and Martin, Darren P.},\r\ndoi = {10.1093/VE/VEAC054},\r\nfile = {:C$\\backslash$:/Users/01462563/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/De Klerk et al. - 2022 - Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera.pdf:pdf},\r\nissn = {20571577},\r\njournal = {Virus Evolution},\r\nkeywords = {Coronavirus,Evolution,OA,Phylogenetics,Recombination,Selection,genomics{\\_}fund{\\_}ack,original},\r\nmendeley-tags = {OA,genomics{\\_}fund{\\_}ack,original},\r\nmonth = {sep},\r\nnumber = {2},\r\npages = {veac054},\r\npmid = {35814334},\r\npublisher = {Oxford Academic},\r\ntitle = {{Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera}},\r\nurl = {https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/8/2/veac054/6608204},\r\nvolume = {8},\r\nyear = {2022}\r\n}\r\n","author_short":["De Klerk, A.","Swanepoel, P.","Lourens, R.","Zondo, M.","Abodunran, I.","Lytras, S.","MacLean, O. A.","Robertson, D.","Kosakovsky Pond, S. L.","Zehr, J. D.","Kumar, V.","Stanhope, M. J.","Harkins, G.","Murrell, B.","Martin, D. P."],"key":"DeKlerk2022","id":"DeKlerk2022","bibbaseid":"deklerk-swanepoel-lourens-zondo-abodunran-lytras-maclean-robertson-etal-conservedrecombinationpatternsacrosscoronavirussubgenera-2022","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://academic.oup.com/ve/article/8/2/veac054/6608204"},"keyword":["Coronavirus","Evolution","OA","Phylogenetics","Recombination","Selection","genomics_fund_ack","original"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":4},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=1-YbiDDZeTcX0VKKZlqqSKulhgmeoOpLm","dataSources":["6GMFi5DCojy3jHY44","zSYPkp7qteCEAzB8y","y6ojaHcuarkmc4yRQ"],"keywords":["coronavirus","evolution","oa","phylogenetics","recombination","selection","genomics_fund_ack","original"],"search_terms":["conserved","recombination","patterns","coronavirus","subgenera","de klerk","swanepoel","lourens","zondo","abodunran","lytras","maclean","robertson","kosakovsky pond","zehr","kumar","stanhope","harkins","murrell","martin"],"title":"Conserved recombination patterns across coronavirus subgenera","year":2022,"downloads":4}