Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building. DENNIS A. GIOIA & EVELYN PITRE Academy of Management Review, 15(4):584--602, 1990. 01370abstract bibtex Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent with the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now assuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a multiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing correspondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts. Because of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we also examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries. In addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together. Such a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena that not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable theoretical differences, but also can encourage them to adopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.
@article{dennis_a._gioia_multiparadigm_1990,
title = {Multiparadigm {Perspectives} on {Theory} {Building}},
volume = {15},
abstract = {Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent
with the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now
assuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a
multiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing
correspondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts.
Because of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we
also examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries.
In addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow
disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together.
Such a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena
that not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable
theoretical differences, but also can encourage them to
adopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.},
number = {4},
journal = {Academy of Management Review},
author = {{DENNIS A. GIOIA} and {EVELYN PITRE}},
year = {1990},
note = {01370},
pages = {584--602}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"7wtRW6KGLsnzmNioc","bibbaseid":"dennisagioia-evelynpitre-multiparadigmperspectivesontheorybuilding-1990","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-12-28T15:54:44.117Z","title":"Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building","author_short":["DENNIS A. GIOIA","EVELYN PITRE"],"year":1990,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/nimdvir","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Multiparadigm Perspectives on Theory Building","volume":"15","abstract":"Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent with the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now assuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a multiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing correspondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts. Because of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we also examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries. In addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow disparate approaches to theory building to be considered together. Such a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena that not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable theoretical differences, but also can encourage them to adopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.","number":"4","journal":"Academy of Management Review","author":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["DENNIS A. GIOIA"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["EVELYN PITRE"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1990","note":"01370","pages":"584--602","bibtex":"@article{dennis_a._gioia_multiparadigm_1990,\n\ttitle = {Multiparadigm {Perspectives} on {Theory} {Building}},\n\tvolume = {15},\n\tabstract = {Traditional approaches to theory building are not entirely consistent\nwith the assumptions of alternative research paradigms that are now\nassuming more prominence in organizational study. We argue for a\nmultiparadigm approach to theory building as a means of establishing\ncorrespondence between paradigms and theory-construction efforts.\nBecause of the implications of the multiparadigm approach, we\nalso examine ways of bridging across blurred paradigm boundaries.\nIn addition, we explore a metaparadigm perspective that might allow\ndisparate approaches to theory building to be considered together.\nSuch a perspective can produce views of organizational phenomena\nthat not only allow scholars to recognize inherent and irreconcilable\ntheoretical differences, but also can encourage them to\nadopt a more comprehensive view by accounting for those differences.},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tjournal = {Academy of Management Review},\n\tauthor = {{DENNIS A. GIOIA} and {EVELYN PITRE}},\n\tyear = {1990},\n\tnote = {01370},\n\tpages = {584--602}\n}\n\n","author_short":["DENNIS A. GIOIA","EVELYN PITRE"],"key":"dennis_a._gioia_multiparadigm_1990","id":"dennis_a._gioia_multiparadigm_1990","bibbaseid":"dennisagioia-evelynpitre-multiparadigmperspectivesontheorybuilding-1990","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["multiparadigm","perspectives","theory","building","dennis a. gioia","evelyn pitre"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["ciBwinN9Eq8RkHS8Q"]}