Factors Associated With Impactful Scientific Publications in NIH-funded Heart Disease Research - ProQuest. Diana Rozenshteyn Ph.D. Thesis, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 2023. Paper abstract bibtex In this study, we investigated factors associated with impactful scientific publications funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the field of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We analyzed a database of NIH-funded heart disease research publications from 2002 to 2020 to uncover key factors contributing to successful outcomes in this field. The study found that funding provided by the NIH positively correlated with the number of publications, and spending cuts in scientific research by the US Congress are associated with research productivity. Our exploratory data analysis revealed the concentration of heart disease research articles in a small number of journals and institutions. We observed gender disparities, with a higher representation of male first authors in top journals and institutions. We demonstrated that male-authored publications received more citations and had higher NIH Percentile scores compared to female-authored publications, indicating a persistent gender gap in publication and visibility. The study also employed predictive modeling, where regression models initially performed poorly, but the XGBoosting model demonstrated the best predictive power among classifiers in estimating the success of cardiovascular research. We defined the success of a publication as the number of people who benefit from the published research and we employed the NIH Percentile as an approximation of that measure. Journal Rank emerged as the most influential feature in predicting research success. Overall, this study provides important insights into the factors influencing impactful publications in the field of heart disease research, including funding, journal selection, institutional affiliations, gender disparities, and the potential for predicting research success.
@phdthesis{diana_rozenshteyn_factors_2023,
address = {San Diego, CA},
title = {Factors {Associated} {With} {Impactful} {Scientific} {Publications} in {NIH}-funded {Heart} {Disease} {Research} - {ProQuest}},
url = {https://www.proquest.com/openview/ec265a4c9746a324243bec515bd521d7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y},
abstract = {In this study, we investigated factors associated with impactful scientific publications funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the field of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We analyzed a database of NIH-funded heart disease research publications from 2002 to 2020 to uncover key factors contributing to successful outcomes in this field. The study found that funding provided by the NIH positively correlated with the number of publications, and spending cuts in scientific research by the US Congress are associated with research productivity. Our exploratory data analysis revealed the concentration of heart disease research articles in a small number of journals and institutions. We observed gender disparities, with a higher representation of male first authors in top journals and institutions. We demonstrated that male-authored publications received more citations and had higher NIH Percentile scores compared to female-authored publications, indicating a persistent gender gap in publication and visibility. The study also employed predictive modeling, where regression models initially performed poorly, but the XGBoosting model demonstrated the best predictive power among classifiers in estimating the success of cardiovascular research. We defined the success of a publication as the number of people who benefit from the published research and we employed the NIH Percentile as an approximation of that measure. Journal Rank emerged as the most influential feature in predicting research success. Overall, this study provides important insights into the factors influencing impactful publications in the field of heart disease research, including funding, journal selection, institutional affiliations, gender disparities, and the potential for predicting research success.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2023-07-26},
school = {San Diego State University},
author = {{Diana Rozenshteyn}},
year = {2023},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Y9hMgspDP49Kbd7oE","bibbaseid":"dianarozenshteyn-factorsassociatedwithimpactfulscientificpublicationsinnihfundedheartdiseaseresearchproquest-2023","author_short":["Diana Rozenshteyn"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"phdthesis","type":"phdthesis","address":"San Diego, CA","title":"Factors Associated With Impactful Scientific Publications in NIH-funded Heart Disease Research - ProQuest","url":"https://www.proquest.com/openview/ec265a4c9746a324243bec515bd521d7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y","abstract":"In this study, we investigated factors associated with impactful scientific publications funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the field of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We analyzed a database of NIH-funded heart disease research publications from 2002 to 2020 to uncover key factors contributing to successful outcomes in this field. The study found that funding provided by the NIH positively correlated with the number of publications, and spending cuts in scientific research by the US Congress are associated with research productivity. Our exploratory data analysis revealed the concentration of heart disease research articles in a small number of journals and institutions. We observed gender disparities, with a higher representation of male first authors in top journals and institutions. We demonstrated that male-authored publications received more citations and had higher NIH Percentile scores compared to female-authored publications, indicating a persistent gender gap in publication and visibility. The study also employed predictive modeling, where regression models initially performed poorly, but the XGBoosting model demonstrated the best predictive power among classifiers in estimating the success of cardiovascular research. We defined the success of a publication as the number of people who benefit from the published research and we employed the NIH Percentile as an approximation of that measure. Journal Rank emerged as the most influential feature in predicting research success. Overall, this study provides important insights into the factors influencing impactful publications in the field of heart disease research, including funding, journal selection, institutional affiliations, gender disparities, and the potential for predicting research success.","language":"en","urldate":"2023-07-26","school":"San Diego State University","author":[{"firstnames":[],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Diana Rozenshteyn"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2023","bibtex":"@phdthesis{diana_rozenshteyn_factors_2023,\n\taddress = {San Diego, CA},\n\ttitle = {Factors {Associated} {With} {Impactful} {Scientific} {Publications} in {NIH}-funded {Heart} {Disease} {Research} - {ProQuest}},\n\turl = {https://www.proquest.com/openview/ec265a4c9746a324243bec515bd521d7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y},\n\tabstract = {In this study, we investigated factors associated with impactful scientific publications funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) in the field of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We analyzed a database of NIH-funded heart disease research publications from 2002 to 2020 to uncover key factors contributing to successful outcomes in this field. The study found that funding provided by the NIH positively correlated with the number of publications, and spending cuts in scientific research by the US Congress are associated with research productivity. Our exploratory data analysis revealed the concentration of heart disease research articles in a small number of journals and institutions. We observed gender disparities, with a higher representation of male first authors in top journals and institutions. We demonstrated that male-authored publications received more citations and had higher NIH Percentile scores compared to female-authored publications, indicating a persistent gender gap in publication and visibility. The study also employed predictive modeling, where regression models initially performed poorly, but the XGBoosting model demonstrated the best predictive power among classifiers in estimating the success of cardiovascular research. We defined the success of a publication as the number of people who benefit from the published research and we employed the NIH Percentile as an approximation of that measure. Journal Rank emerged as the most influential feature in predicting research success. Overall, this study provides important insights into the factors influencing impactful publications in the field of heart disease research, including funding, journal selection, institutional affiliations, gender disparities, and the potential for predicting research success.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2023-07-26},\n\tschool = {San Diego State University},\n\tauthor = {{Diana Rozenshteyn}},\n\tyear = {2023},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Diana Rozenshteyn"],"key":"diana_rozenshteyn_factors_2023","id":"diana_rozenshteyn_factors_2023","bibbaseid":"dianarozenshteyn-factorsassociatedwithimpactfulscientificpublicationsinnihfundedheartdiseaseresearchproquest-2023","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.proquest.com/openview/ec265a4c9746a324243bec515bd521d7/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"phdthesis","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/researchorgs/4790165","dataSources":["XooGe8m5uEyMY8yz7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["factors","associated","impactful","scientific","publications","nih","funded","heart","disease","research","proquest","diana rozenshteyn"],"title":"Factors Associated With Impactful Scientific Publications in NIH-funded Heart Disease Research - ProQuest","year":2023}