Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives. Dichmont, C. M., Ellis, N., Bustamante, R. H., Deng, R., Tickell, S., Pascual, R., Lozano-Montes, H., & Griffiths, S. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 50(4):1060-1070, WILEY-BLACKWELL, 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA, AUG, 2013. doi abstract bibtex 1. Spatial management is used extensively in natural resource management to address sustainability and biodiversity issues, for example through declaration of terrestrial National Parks and marine protected areas (MPAs). 2. Spatial management is used also to optimize yields or protect key parts of the life cycle of species that are utilized (hunted, farmed or fished), for example through rotational harvesting. 3. To evaluate the effectiveness of marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives, a series of marine fisheries closures are here analysed using an integrative modelling tool known as management strategy evaluation (MSE). 4. This modelling framework combines a food web model of a tropical ecosystem fished by a prawn (shrimp) fishery that emulates the resource being managed, together with the present management system and risk-based tools of fishing the prawn species at maximum economic yield. 5. A series of spatial closures are designed and tested with the aim of investigating trade-offs among biodiversity (MPA), benthic impacts, ecosystem function, key species at risk to fishing, economic and sustainability objectives. 6. Synthesis and applications. This paper illustrates that existing tools often available in actively managed fisheries can be linked together into an effective management strategy evaluation framework. Spatial closures tended to succeed with respect to their specific design objective, but this benefit did not necessarily flow to other broad-scale objectives. This demonstrates that there is no single management tool which satisfies all objectives, and that a suite of management tools is needed.
@article{ ISI:000321762900026,
Author = {Dichmont, Catherine M. and Ellis, Nick and Bustamante, Rodrigo H. and
Deng, Roy and Tickell, Sharon and Pascual, Ricardo and Lozano-Montes,
Hector and Griffiths, Shane},
Title = {{Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and
conservation objectives}},
Journal = {{JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY}},
Year = {{2013}},
Volume = {{50}},
Number = {{4}},
Pages = {{1060-1070}},
Month = {{AUG}},
Abstract = {{1. Spatial management is used extensively in natural resource management
to address sustainability and biodiversity issues, for example through
declaration of terrestrial National Parks and marine protected areas
(MPAs).
2. Spatial management is used also to optimize yields or protect key
parts of the life cycle of species that are utilized (hunted, farmed or
fished), for example through rotational harvesting.
3. To evaluate the effectiveness of marine spatial closures with
conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives, a series of marine
fisheries closures are here analysed using an integrative modelling tool
known as management strategy evaluation (MSE).
4. This modelling framework combines a food web model of a tropical
ecosystem fished by a prawn (shrimp) fishery that emulates the resource
being managed, together with the present management system and
risk-based tools of fishing the prawn species at maximum economic yield.
5. A series of spatial closures are designed and tested with the aim of
investigating trade-offs among biodiversity (MPA), benthic impacts,
ecosystem function, key species at risk to fishing, economic and
sustainability objectives.
6. Synthesis and applications. This paper illustrates that existing
tools often available in actively managed fisheries can be linked
together into an effective management strategy evaluation framework.
Spatial closures tended to succeed with respect to their specific design
objective, but this benefit did not necessarily flow to other
broad-scale objectives. This demonstrates that there is no single
management tool which satisfies all objectives, and that a suite of
management tools is needed.}},
Publisher = {{WILEY-BLACKWELL}},
Address = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Dichmont, CM (Reprint Author), CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia.
Dichmont, Catherine M.; Ellis, Nick; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; Deng, Roy; Tickell, Sharon; Pascual, Ricardo; Griffiths, Shane, CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia.
Lozano-Montes, Hector, CSIRO Wealth Ocean Flagship, Ctr Environm \& Life Sci, Floreat, WA, Australia.}},
DOI = {{10.1111/1365-2664.12110}},
ISSN = {{0021-8901}},
Keywords = {{benthic impacts; conflicting management objectives; ecosystem; effects
of trawling; management strategy evaluation; marine protected areas;
risk assessment; threatened and endangered species; trade-offs}},
Keywords-Plus = {{NORTHERN PRAWN FISHERY; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; ECOSYSTEM OBJECTIVES;
TRAWL FISHERY; AUSTRALIA; BYCATCH; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACTS; DIVERSITY;
ECONOMICS}},
Research-Areas = {{Biodiversity \& Conservation; Environmental Sciences \& Ecology}},
Web-of-Science-Categories = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology}},
Author-Email = {{cathy.dichmont@csiro.au}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Ellis, Nick/B-4310-2009
Dichmont, Catherine/A-9528-2008
Pascual, Ricardo/A-2846-2012}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Ellis, Nick/0000-0001-8761-5128
}},
Funding-Acknowledgement = {{Australian National Facility; Australian Fisheries Research and
Development Corporation (FRDC) {[}2005/050]; Australia's Department of
the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts (DEWHA); CSIRO Wealth from
Oceans}},
Funding-Text = {{We are grateful for the support provided by the Australian National
Facility, and we thank the fishing, scientific and electronic crews of
the R. V. Southern Surveyor for making the research voyage and sample
collection possible. Several CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric staff are
thanked for their assistance in this study: G. Fry, T. Okey, J. Salini,
S. Cheers, R. Pendrey and S. Pardo for their contribution to sample
collection and processing; D. Milton and S. Blaber for editing the
original report manuscript; P. Bayliss and M. Haywood the draft
manuscript. This research was funded in part by the Australian Fisheries
Research and Development Corporation (FRDC; Project 2005/050),
Australia's Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts
(DEWHA) and CSIRO Wealth from Oceans.}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{48}},
Times-Cited = {{25}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{3}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{93}},
Journal-ISO = {{J. Appl. Ecol.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{182RX}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000321762900026}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"DSDprSqxLjAfntuNL","bibbaseid":"dichmont-ellis-bustamante-deng-tickell-pascual-lozanomontes-griffiths-evaluatingmarinespatialclosureswithconflictingfisheriesandconservationobjectives-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-08-17T14:08:07.562Z","title":"Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives","author_short":["Dichmont, C. M.","Ellis, N.","Bustamante, R. H.","Deng, R.","Tickell, S.","Pascual, R.","Lozano-Montes, H.","Griffiths, S."],"year":2013,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://flr-project.org/flr.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"Article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dichmont"],"firstnames":["Catherine","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ellis"],"firstnames":["Nick"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bustamante"],"firstnames":["Rodrigo","H."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Deng"],"firstnames":["Roy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tickell"],"firstnames":["Sharon"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pascual"],"firstnames":["Ricardo"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lozano-Montes"],"firstnames":["Hector"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Griffiths"],"firstnames":["Shane"],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives","journal":"JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY","year":"2013","volume":"50","number":"4","pages":"1060-1070","month":"AUG","abstract":"1. Spatial management is used extensively in natural resource management to address sustainability and biodiversity issues, for example through declaration of terrestrial National Parks and marine protected areas (MPAs). 2. Spatial management is used also to optimize yields or protect key parts of the life cycle of species that are utilized (hunted, farmed or fished), for example through rotational harvesting. 3. To evaluate the effectiveness of marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives, a series of marine fisheries closures are here analysed using an integrative modelling tool known as management strategy evaluation (MSE). 4. This modelling framework combines a food web model of a tropical ecosystem fished by a prawn (shrimp) fishery that emulates the resource being managed, together with the present management system and risk-based tools of fishing the prawn species at maximum economic yield. 5. A series of spatial closures are designed and tested with the aim of investigating trade-offs among biodiversity (MPA), benthic impacts, ecosystem function, key species at risk to fishing, economic and sustainability objectives. 6. Synthesis and applications. This paper illustrates that existing tools often available in actively managed fisheries can be linked together into an effective management strategy evaluation framework. Spatial closures tended to succeed with respect to their specific design objective, but this benefit did not necessarily flow to other broad-scale objectives. This demonstrates that there is no single management tool which satisfies all objectives, and that a suite of management tools is needed.","publisher":"WILEY-BLACKWELL","address":"111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA","language":"English","affiliation":"Dichmont, CM (Reprint Author), CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia. Dichmont, Catherine M.; Ellis, Nick; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; Deng, Roy; Tickell, Sharon; Pascual, Ricardo; Griffiths, Shane, CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia. Lozano-Montes, Hector, CSIRO Wealth Ocean Flagship, Ctr Environm & Life Sci, Floreat, WA, Australia.","doi":"10.1111/1365-2664.12110","issn":"0021-8901","keywords":"benthic impacts; conflicting management objectives; ecosystem; effects of trawling; management strategy evaluation; marine protected areas; risk assessment; threatened and endangered species; trade-offs","keywords-plus":"NORTHERN PRAWN FISHERY; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; ECOSYSTEM OBJECTIVES; TRAWL FISHERY; AUSTRALIA; BYCATCH; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACTS; DIVERSITY; ECONOMICS","research-areas":"Biodiversity & Conservation; Environmental Sciences & Ecology","web-of-science-categories":"Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology","author-email":"cathy.dichmont@csiro.au","researcherid-numbers":"Ellis, Nick/B-4310-2009 Dichmont, Catherine/A-9528-2008 Pascual, Ricardo/A-2846-2012","orcid-numbers":"Ellis, Nick/0000-0001-8761-5128 ","funding-acknowledgement":"Australian National Facility; Australian Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC) [2005/050]; Australia's Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts (DEWHA); CSIRO Wealth from Oceans","funding-text":"We are grateful for the support provided by the Australian National Facility, and we thank the fishing, scientific and electronic crews of the R. V. Southern Surveyor for making the research voyage and sample collection possible. Several CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric staff are thanked for their assistance in this study: G. Fry, T. Okey, J. Salini, S. Cheers, R. Pendrey and S. Pardo for their contribution to sample collection and processing; D. Milton and S. Blaber for editing the original report manuscript; P. Bayliss and M. Haywood the draft manuscript. This research was funded in part by the Australian Fisheries Research and Development Corporation (FRDC; Project 2005/050), Australia's Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts (DEWHA) and CSIRO Wealth from Oceans.","number-of-cited-references":"48","times-cited":"25","usage-count-last-180-days":"3","usage-count-since-2013":"93","journal-iso":"J. Appl. Ecol.","doc-delivery-number":"182RX","unique-id":"ISI:000321762900026","oa":"No","da":"2017-08-17","bibtex":"@article{ ISI:000321762900026,\nAuthor = {Dichmont, Catherine M. and Ellis, Nick and Bustamante, Rodrigo H. and\n Deng, Roy and Tickell, Sharon and Pascual, Ricardo and Lozano-Montes,\n Hector and Griffiths, Shane},\nTitle = {{Evaluating marine spatial closures with conflicting fisheries and\n conservation objectives}},\nJournal = {{JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY}},\nYear = {{2013}},\nVolume = {{50}},\nNumber = {{4}},\nPages = {{1060-1070}},\nMonth = {{AUG}},\nAbstract = {{1. Spatial management is used extensively in natural resource management\n to address sustainability and biodiversity issues, for example through\n declaration of terrestrial National Parks and marine protected areas\n (MPAs).\n 2. Spatial management is used also to optimize yields or protect key\n parts of the life cycle of species that are utilized (hunted, farmed or\n fished), for example through rotational harvesting.\n 3. To evaluate the effectiveness of marine spatial closures with\n conflicting fisheries and conservation objectives, a series of marine\n fisheries closures are here analysed using an integrative modelling tool\n known as management strategy evaluation (MSE).\n 4. This modelling framework combines a food web model of a tropical\n ecosystem fished by a prawn (shrimp) fishery that emulates the resource\n being managed, together with the present management system and\n risk-based tools of fishing the prawn species at maximum economic yield.\n 5. A series of spatial closures are designed and tested with the aim of\n investigating trade-offs among biodiversity (MPA), benthic impacts,\n ecosystem function, key species at risk to fishing, economic and\n sustainability objectives.\n 6. Synthesis and applications. This paper illustrates that existing\n tools often available in actively managed fisheries can be linked\n together into an effective management strategy evaluation framework.\n Spatial closures tended to succeed with respect to their specific design\n objective, but this benefit did not necessarily flow to other\n broad-scale objectives. This demonstrates that there is no single\n management tool which satisfies all objectives, and that a suite of\n management tools is needed.}},\nPublisher = {{WILEY-BLACKWELL}},\nAddress = {{111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA}},\nType = {{Article}},\nLanguage = {{English}},\nAffiliation = {{Dichmont, CM (Reprint Author), CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, 41 Boggo Rd, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia.\n Dichmont, Catherine M.; Ellis, Nick; Bustamante, Rodrigo H.; Deng, Roy; Tickell, Sharon; Pascual, Ricardo; Griffiths, Shane, CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Ecosci Precinct, Dutton Pk, Qld, Australia.\n Lozano-Montes, Hector, CSIRO Wealth Ocean Flagship, Ctr Environm \\& Life Sci, Floreat, WA, Australia.}},\nDOI = {{10.1111/1365-2664.12110}},\nISSN = {{0021-8901}},\nKeywords = {{benthic impacts; conflicting management objectives; ecosystem; effects\n of trawling; management strategy evaluation; marine protected areas;\n risk assessment; threatened and endangered species; trade-offs}},\nKeywords-Plus = {{NORTHERN PRAWN FISHERY; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; ECOSYSTEM OBJECTIVES;\n TRAWL FISHERY; AUSTRALIA; BYCATCH; SUSTAINABILITY; IMPACTS; DIVERSITY;\n ECONOMICS}},\nResearch-Areas = {{Biodiversity \\& Conservation; Environmental Sciences \\& Ecology}},\nWeb-of-Science-Categories = {{Biodiversity Conservation; Ecology}},\nAuthor-Email = {{cathy.dichmont@csiro.au}},\nResearcherID-Numbers = {{Ellis, Nick/B-4310-2009\n Dichmont, Catherine/A-9528-2008\n Pascual, Ricardo/A-2846-2012}},\nORCID-Numbers = {{Ellis, Nick/0000-0001-8761-5128\n }},\nFunding-Acknowledgement = {{Australian National Facility; Australian Fisheries Research and\n Development Corporation (FRDC) {[}2005/050]; Australia's Department of\n the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts (DEWHA); CSIRO Wealth from\n Oceans}},\nFunding-Text = {{We are grateful for the support provided by the Australian National\n Facility, and we thank the fishing, scientific and electronic crews of\n the R. V. Southern Surveyor for making the research voyage and sample\n collection possible. Several CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric staff are\n thanked for their assistance in this study: G. Fry, T. Okey, J. Salini,\n S. Cheers, R. Pendrey and S. Pardo for their contribution to sample\n collection and processing; D. Milton and S. Blaber for editing the\n original report manuscript; P. Bayliss and M. Haywood the draft\n manuscript. This research was funded in part by the Australian Fisheries\n Research and Development Corporation (FRDC; Project 2005/050),\n Australia's Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and Arts\n (DEWHA) and CSIRO Wealth from Oceans.}},\nNumber-of-Cited-References = {{48}},\nTimes-Cited = {{25}},\nUsage-Count-Last-180-days = {{3}},\nUsage-Count-Since-2013 = {{93}},\nJournal-ISO = {{J. Appl. Ecol.}},\nDoc-Delivery-Number = {{182RX}},\nUnique-ID = {{ISI:000321762900026}},\nOA = {{No}},\nDA = {{2017-08-17}},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Dichmont, C. M.","Ellis, N.","Bustamante, R. H.","Deng, R.","Tickell, S.","Pascual, R.","Lozano-Montes, H.","Griffiths, S."],"key":"ISI:000321762900026","id":"ISI:000321762900026","bibbaseid":"dichmont-ellis-bustamante-deng-tickell-pascual-lozanomontes-griffiths-evaluatingmarinespatialclosureswithconflictingfisheriesandconservationobjectives-2013","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["benthic impacts; conflicting management objectives; ecosystem; effects of trawling; management strategy evaluation; marine protected areas; risk assessment; threatened and endangered species; trade-offs"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["evaluating","marine","spatial","closures","conflicting","fisheries","conservation","objectives","dichmont","ellis","bustamante","deng","tickell","pascual","lozano-montes","griffiths"],"keywords":["benthic impacts; conflicting management objectives; ecosystem; effects of trawling; management strategy evaluation; marine protected areas; risk assessment; threatened and endangered species; trade-offs"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["WA8XYs6LQoFRqHaQt","NDGPxX9hJs9BdrF52"]}