Phenology and duration of remigial moult in Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) and White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca) on the Pacific coast of North America. Dickson, R., D., Esler, D., Hupp, J., W., Anderson, E., M., Evenson, J., R., & Barrett, J. Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie, 90(8):932-944, 2012.
Phenology and duration of remigial moult in Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) and White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca) on the Pacific coast of North America [link]Website  abstract   bibtex   
By quantifying phenology and duration of remigial moult in Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata (L., 1758)) and White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca (L., 1758)), we tested whether timing of moult is dictated by temporal optima or constraints. Scoters (n = 3481) were captured during moult in Alaska, British Columbia, and Washington, and remigial emergence dates were determined. We provide evidence for a pre-emergence interval of 7.3 days that occurs after old primaries are shed and before new ones become visible. All age and sex classes of both scoter species exhibited a wide range of emergence dates (Surf Scoters: 26 June to 22 September; White-winged Scoters: 6 July to 21 September) suggestive of a lack of strong temporal optima for remigial moult. For both species, timing of moult was influenced by site, year, age, and sex. Relative to other waterfowl species, scoters have typical remigial growth rates (Surf Scoters: 3.9 mm.day super(-1); White-winged Scoters: 4.3 mm.day super(-1)) but a long flightless period (34-49 days), in part because their relatively high wing-loading requires a greater proportion of feather regrowth to regain flight. Our data suggest that moulting scoters are not under strong selective pressure to complete moult quickly.
@article{
 title = {Phenology and duration of remigial moult in Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata) and White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca) on the Pacific coast of North America},
 type = {article},
 year = {2012},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {Alaska; INE,British Columbia; Growth rate; Waterfowl; Age; Da,Canada,USA,Washington; Molting; Ecology Abstracts; Environme},
 pages = {932-944},
 volume = {90},
 websites = {http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/z2012-061#.VADh8fldXT8},
 id = {4fb18988-f679-3d51-8eb9-d16620e97c07},
 created = {2016-06-01T14:22:49.000Z},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {9aa84141-6744-3000-aa2d-8b83b70f0402},
 group_id = {3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1},
 last_modified = {2017-03-14T12:29:53.092Z},
 read = {true},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 folder_uuids = {73ce8aba-3b21-4a65-a162-83f58adb356d},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {By quantifying phenology and duration of remigial moult in Surf Scoters (Melanitta perspicillata (L., 1758)) and White-winged Scoters (Melanitta fusca (L., 1758)), we tested whether timing of moult is dictated by temporal optima or constraints. Scoters (n = 3481) were captured during moult in Alaska, British Columbia, and Washington, and remigial emergence dates were determined. We provide evidence for a pre-emergence interval of 7.3 days that occurs after old primaries are shed and before new ones become visible. All age and sex classes of both scoter species exhibited a wide range of emergence dates (Surf Scoters: 26 June to 22 September; White-winged Scoters: 6 July to 21 September) suggestive of a lack of strong temporal optima for remigial moult. For both species, timing of moult was influenced by site, year, age, and sex. Relative to other waterfowl species, scoters have typical remigial growth rates (Surf Scoters: 3.9 mm.day super(-1); White-winged Scoters: 4.3 mm.day super(-1)) but a long flightless period (34-49 days), in part because their relatively high wing-loading requires a greater proportion of feather regrowth to regain flight. Our data suggest that moulting scoters are not under strong selective pressure to complete moult quickly.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Dickson, R D and Esler, D and Hupp, J W and Anderson, E M and Evenson, J R and Barrett, J},
 journal = {Canadian Journal of Zoology/Revue Canadienne de Zoologie},
 number = {8}
}

Downloads: 0