Grand Designs? The ‘Managerial’ Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy. Di Francesco, M. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(3):257--268, 2012. Paper doi abstract bibtex This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making ‘management’ reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key ‘inherencies’ that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management – in particular, performance control – are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management ‘heresy’ by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.
@article{di_francesco_grand_2012,
title = {Grand {Designs}? {The} ‘{Managerial}’ {Role} of {Ministers} {Within} {Westminster}-{Based} {Public} {Management} {Policy}},
volume = {71},
copyright = {© 2012 The Author Australian Journal of Public Administration © 2012 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia},
issn = {1467-8500},
shorttitle = {Grand {Designs}?},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x/abstract},
doi = {10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x},
abstract = {This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making ‘management’ reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key ‘inherencies’ that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management – in particular, performance control – are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management ‘heresy’ by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.},
language = {en},
number = {3},
urldate = {2012-10-29},
journal = {Australian Journal of Public Administration},
author = {Di Francesco, Michael},
year = {2012},
keywords = {ministers and executive politics, organisational performance management, public management policy},
pages = {257--268}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"oD96Y5pp7QaBgSWZK","bibbaseid":"difrancesco-granddesignsthemanagerialroleofministerswithinwestminsterbasedpublicmanagementpolicy-2012","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:31.224Z","title":"Grand Designs? The ‘Managerial’ Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy","author_short":["Di Francesco, M."],"year":2012,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Grand Designs? The ‘Managerial’ Role of Ministers Within Westminster-Based Public Management Policy","volume":"71","copyright":"© 2012 The Author Australian Journal of Public Administration © 2012 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia","issn":"1467-8500","shorttitle":"Grand Designs?","url":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x/abstract","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x","abstract":"This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making ‘management’ reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key ‘inherencies’ that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management – in particular, performance control – are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management ‘heresy’ by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.","language":"en","number":"3","urldate":"2012-10-29","journal":"Australian Journal of Public Administration","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Di","Francesco"],"firstnames":["Michael"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2012","keywords":"ministers and executive politics, organisational performance management, public management policy","pages":"257--268","bibtex":"@article{di_francesco_grand_2012,\n\ttitle = {Grand {Designs}? {The} ‘{Managerial}’ {Role} of {Ministers} {Within} {Westminster}-{Based} {Public} {Management} {Policy}},\n\tvolume = {71},\n\tcopyright = {© 2012 The Author Australian Journal of Public Administration © 2012 National Council of the Institute of Public Administration Australia},\n\tissn = {1467-8500},\n\tshorttitle = {Grand {Designs}?},\n\turl = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x/abstract},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x},\n\tabstract = {This article explores the design of public management policies in Westminster-based systems, with a focus on Australia. It argues that orthodox analysis of public management policy is deficient in two ways: first, policy change directed at bureaucratic structures tends to ignore the critical role that ministers must play in making ‘management’ reforms work; second, such policy change tends to assume away key ‘inherencies’ that inhibit behavioural changes in politicians that might otherwise be expected from enhanced management structures. The article examines the under-conceptualised managerial role that requires ministers to be an integral part of departmental leadership, and contends that key aspects of public management – in particular, performance control – are dependent on this ministerial role orientation becoming more prominent. In effect, the article raises a public management ‘heresy’ by profiling the need for ministers to conform more with their own prescriptions for improved management.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2012-10-29},\n\tjournal = {Australian Journal of Public Administration},\n\tauthor = {Di Francesco, Michael},\n\tyear = {2012},\n\tkeywords = {ministers and executive politics, organisational performance management, public management policy},\n\tpages = {257--268}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Di Francesco, M."],"key":"di_francesco_grand_2012","id":"di_francesco_grand_2012","bibbaseid":"difrancesco-granddesignsthemanagerialroleofministerswithinwestminsterbasedpublicmanagementpolicy-2012","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00783.x/abstract"},"keyword":["ministers and executive politics","organisational performance management","public management policy"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["grand","designs","managerial","role","ministers","within","westminster","based","public","management","policy","di francesco"],"keywords":["ministers and executive politics","organisational performance management","public management policy"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}