@book{dorian_purism_1994,
	title = {Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival},
	volume = {23},
	isbn = {00474045},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/4168553?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents},
	abstract = {Conservative attitudes toward loanwords and toward change in grammar often hamper efforts to revitalize endangered languages (Tiwi, Austra- lia); and incompatible conservatisms can separate educated revitalizers, interested in historicity, from remaining speakers interested in locally authentic idiomaticity (Irish). Native-speaker conservatism is likely to constitute a barrier to coinage (Gaelic, Scotland), and unrealistically severe older-speaker purism can discourage younger speakers where edu- cation in a minority language is unavailable (Nahuatl, Mexico). Even in the case of a once entirely extinct language, rival authenticities can prove a severe problem (the Cornish revival movement in Britain). Evidence from obsolescent Arvanitika (Greece), from Pennsylvania German (US), and from Irish in Northern Ireland (the successful Shaw's Road commu- nity in Belfast) suggests that structural compromise may enhance survival chances; and the case of English in the post-Norman period indicates that restructuring by intense language contact can leave a language both viable and versatile, with full potential for future expansion.},
	language = {eng},
	number = {4},
	author = {Dorian, Nancy C},
	year = {1994},
}

{"_id":"pezTmxnYS7LgJ7urE","bibbaseid":"dorian-purismvscompromiseinlanguagerevitalizationandlanguagerevival-1994","author_short":["Dorian, N. C"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"book","type":"book","title":"Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival","volume":"23","isbn":"00474045","url":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/4168553?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents","abstract":"Conservative attitudes toward loanwords and toward change in grammar often hamper efforts to revitalize endangered languages (Tiwi, Austra- lia); and incompatible conservatisms can separate educated revitalizers, interested in historicity, from remaining speakers interested in locally authentic idiomaticity (Irish). Native-speaker conservatism is likely to constitute a barrier to coinage (Gaelic, Scotland), and unrealistically severe older-speaker purism can discourage younger speakers where edu- cation in a minority language is unavailable (Nahuatl, Mexico). Even in the case of a once entirely extinct language, rival authenticities can prove a severe problem (the Cornish revival movement in Britain). Evidence from obsolescent Arvanitika (Greece), from Pennsylvania German (US), and from Irish in Northern Ireland (the successful Shaw's Road commu- nity in Belfast) suggests that structural compromise may enhance survival chances; and the case of English in the post-Norman period indicates that restructuring by intense language contact can leave a language both viable and versatile, with full potential for future expansion.","language":"eng","number":"4","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dorian"],"firstnames":["Nancy","C"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1994","bibtex":"@book{dorian_purism_1994,\n\ttitle = {Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival},\n\tvolume = {23},\n\tisbn = {00474045},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/4168553?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents},\n\tabstract = {Conservative attitudes toward loanwords and toward change in grammar often hamper efforts to revitalize endangered languages (Tiwi, Austra- lia); and incompatible conservatisms can separate educated revitalizers, interested in historicity, from remaining speakers interested in locally authentic idiomaticity (Irish). Native-speaker conservatism is likely to constitute a barrier to coinage (Gaelic, Scotland), and unrealistically severe older-speaker purism can discourage younger speakers where edu- cation in a minority language is unavailable (Nahuatl, Mexico). Even in the case of a once entirely extinct language, rival authenticities can prove a severe problem (the Cornish revival movement in Britain). Evidence from obsolescent Arvanitika (Greece), from Pennsylvania German (US), and from Irish in Northern Ireland (the successful Shaw's Road commu- nity in Belfast) suggests that structural compromise may enhance survival chances; and the case of English in the post-Norman period indicates that restructuring by intense language contact can leave a language both viable and versatile, with full potential for future expansion.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\tauthor = {Dorian, Nancy C},\n\tyear = {1994},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Dorian, N. C"],"key":"dorian_purism_1994-1","id":"dorian_purism_1994-1","bibbaseid":"dorian-purismvscompromiseinlanguagerevitalizationandlanguagerevival-1994","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/4168553?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"book","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/JANRIV","dataSources":["apawDb9YbtTZ2cs7p","6ganJHGdhAYDmSCt5"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["purism","compromise","language","revitalization","language","revival","dorian"],"title":"Purism vs. compromise in language revitalization and language revival","year":1994}