Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data. Douglas, D., C., Weinzierl, R., C. Davidson, S., Kays, R., Wikelski, M., & Bohrer, G. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(6):999-1007, 2012.
abstract   bibtex   
* The Argos System is used worldwide to satellite-track free-ranging animals, but location errors can range from tens of metres to hundreds of kilometres. Low-quality locations (Argos classes A, 0, B and Z) dominate animal tracking data. Standard-quality animal tracking locations (Argos classes 3, 2 and 1) have larger errors than those reported in Argos manuals. * The Douglas Argos-filter (DAF) algorithm flags implausible locations based on user-defined thresholds that allow the algorithm's performance to be tuned to species' movement behaviours and study objectives. The algorithm is available in Movebank – a free online infrastructure for storing, managing, sharing and analysing animal movement data. * We compared 21,044 temporally paired global positioning system (GPS) locations with Argos location estimates collected from Argos transmitters on free-ranging waterfowl and condors (13 species, 314 individuals, 54,895 animal-tracking days). The 95th error percentiles for unfiltered Argos locations 0, A, B and Z were within 35·8, 59·6, 163·2 and 220·2 km of the true location, respectively. After applying DAF with liberal thresholds, roughly 20% of the class 0 and A locations and 45% of the class B and Z locations were excluded, and the 95th error percentiles were reduced to 17·2, 15·0, 20·9 and 18·6 km for classes 0, A, B and Z, respectively. As thresholds were applied more conservatively, fewer locations were retained, but they possessed higher overall accuracy. * Douglas Argos-filter can improve data accuracy by 50–90% and is an effective and flexible tool for preparing Argos data for direct biological interpretation or subsequent modelling.
@article{
 title = {Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data},
 type = {article},
 year = {2012},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {Accuracy,Animal movement,Argos,Douglas Argos-filter,Movebank,Satellite telemetry},
 pages = {999-1007},
 volume = {3},
 id = {df73dbe5-855e-32be-ac23-f69f1f160289},
 created = {2020-02-27T20:18:55.853Z},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {d529d6d9-691c-3d58-ace4-a53b70b2cd14},
 group_id = {3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1},
 last_modified = {2020-02-27T20:55:07.276Z},
 read = {true},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 folder_uuids = {73ce8aba-3b21-4a65-a162-83f58adb356d,0688ee91-2b89-4452-ab05-5b9e9cad4186,f143949d-9cdb-43da-b0d7-73afc391fe35,a0ff9213-6bdb-49c4-88d5-3921fbcbd711},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {* The Argos System is used worldwide to satellite-track free-ranging animals, but location errors can range from tens of metres to hundreds of kilometres. Low-quality locations (Argos classes A, 0, B and Z) dominate animal tracking data. Standard-quality animal tracking locations (Argos classes 3, 2 and 1) have larger errors than those reported in Argos manuals. * The Douglas Argos-filter (DAF) algorithm flags implausible locations based on user-defined thresholds that allow the algorithm's performance to be tuned to species' movement behaviours and study objectives. The algorithm is available in Movebank – a free online infrastructure for storing, managing, sharing and analysing animal movement data. * We compared 21,044 temporally paired global positioning system (GPS) locations with Argos location estimates collected from Argos transmitters on free-ranging waterfowl and condors (13 species, 314 individuals, 54,895 animal-tracking days). The 95th error percentiles for unfiltered Argos locations 0, A, B and Z were within 35·8, 59·6, 163·2 and 220·2 km of the true location, respectively. After applying DAF with liberal thresholds, roughly 20% of the class 0 and A locations and 45% of the class B and Z locations were excluded, and the 95th error percentiles were reduced to 17·2, 15·0, 20·9 and 18·6 km for classes 0, A, B and Z, respectively. As thresholds were applied more conservatively, fewer locations were retained, but they possessed higher overall accuracy. * Douglas Argos-filter can improve data accuracy by 50–90% and is an effective and flexible tool for preparing Argos data for direct biological interpretation or subsequent modelling.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Douglas, David C. and Weinzierl, Rolf and C. Davidson, Sarah and Kays, Roland and Wikelski, Martin and Bohrer, Gil},
 journal = {Methods in Ecology and Evolution},
 number = {6}
}

Downloads: 0