Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a German university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products. Egert, M., Späth, K., Weik, K., Kunzelmann, H., Horn, C., Kohl, M., & Blessing, F. Folia Microbiologica, 60(2):159–164, October, 2014. ![Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a German university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Smartphone touchscreens are known as pathogen carriers in clinical environments. However, despite a rapidly growing number of smartphone users worldwide, little is known about bacterial contamination of smartphone touchscreens in non-clinical settings. Such data are needed to better understand the hygienic relevance of these increasingly popular items. Here, 60 touchscreens of smartphones provided by randomly chosen students of a German university were sampled by directly touching them with contact agar plates. The average bacterial load of uncleaned touchscreens was 1.37 ± 0.33 CFU/cm2. Touchscreens wiped with commercially available microfiber cloths or alcohol-impregnated lens wipes contained significantly less bacteria than uncleaned touchscreens, i.e., 0.22 ± 0.10 CFU/cm2 and 0.06 ± 0.02 CFU/cm2, respectively. Bacteria isolated from cleaned and uncleaned touchscreens were identified by means of MALDI Biotyping. Out of 111 bacterial isolates, 56 isolates (50 %) were identified to genus level and 27 (24 %) to species level. The vast majority of the identified bacteria were typical human skin, mouth, lung, and intestinal commensals, mostly affiliated with the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. Five out of 10 identified species were opportunistic pathogens. In conclusion, the touchscreens investigated here showed low bacterial loads and a species spectrum that is typical for frequently touched surfaces in domestic and public environments, the general health risk of which is still under debate.
@article{egert_bacteria_2014,
title = {Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a {German} university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products},
volume = {60},
issn = {0015-5632, 1874-9356},
url = {http://link.springer.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/article/10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2},
doi = {10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2},
abstract = {Smartphone touchscreens are known as pathogen carriers in clinical environments. However, despite a rapidly growing number of smartphone users worldwide, little is known about bacterial contamination of smartphone touchscreens in non-clinical settings. Such data are needed to better understand the hygienic relevance of these increasingly popular items. Here, 60 touchscreens of smartphones provided by randomly chosen students of a German university were sampled by directly touching them with contact agar plates. The average bacterial load of uncleaned touchscreens was 1.37 ± 0.33 CFU/cm2. Touchscreens wiped with commercially available microfiber cloths or alcohol-impregnated lens wipes contained significantly less bacteria than uncleaned touchscreens, i.e., 0.22 ± 0.10 CFU/cm2 and 0.06 ± 0.02 CFU/cm2, respectively. Bacteria isolated from cleaned and uncleaned touchscreens were identified by means of MALDI Biotyping. Out of 111 bacterial isolates, 56 isolates (50 \%) were identified to genus level and 27 (24 \%) to species level. The vast majority of the identified bacteria were typical human skin, mouth, lung, and intestinal commensals, mostly affiliated with the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. Five out of 10 identified species were opportunistic pathogens. In conclusion, the touchscreens investigated here showed low bacterial loads and a species spectrum that is typical for frequently touched surfaces in domestic and public environments, the general health risk of which is still under debate.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2015-10-31},
journal = {Folia Microbiologica},
author = {Egert, Markus and Späth, Kerstin and Weik, Karoline and Kunzelmann, Heike and Horn, Christian and Kohl, Matthias and Blessing, Frithjof},
month = oct,
year = {2014},
keywords = {Applied Microbiology, Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology, Immunology, Life Sciences, general, Microbiology},
pages = {159--164},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"sM7CxvifKjJTChaXy","bibbaseid":"egert-spth-weik-kunzelmann-horn-kohl-blessing-bacteriaonsmartphonetouchscreensinagermanuniversitysettingandevaluationoftwopopularcleaningmethodsusingcommerciallyavailablecleaningproducts-2014","author_short":["Egert, M.","Späth, K.","Weik, K.","Kunzelmann, H.","Horn, C.","Kohl, M.","Blessing, F."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a German university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products","volume":"60","issn":"0015-5632, 1874-9356","url":"http://link.springer.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/article/10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2","doi":"10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2","abstract":"Smartphone touchscreens are known as pathogen carriers in clinical environments. However, despite a rapidly growing number of smartphone users worldwide, little is known about bacterial contamination of smartphone touchscreens in non-clinical settings. Such data are needed to better understand the hygienic relevance of these increasingly popular items. Here, 60 touchscreens of smartphones provided by randomly chosen students of a German university were sampled by directly touching them with contact agar plates. The average bacterial load of uncleaned touchscreens was 1.37 ± 0.33 CFU/cm2. Touchscreens wiped with commercially available microfiber cloths or alcohol-impregnated lens wipes contained significantly less bacteria than uncleaned touchscreens, i.e., 0.22 ± 0.10 CFU/cm2 and 0.06 ± 0.02 CFU/cm2, respectively. Bacteria isolated from cleaned and uncleaned touchscreens were identified by means of MALDI Biotyping. Out of 111 bacterial isolates, 56 isolates (50 %) were identified to genus level and 27 (24 %) to species level. The vast majority of the identified bacteria were typical human skin, mouth, lung, and intestinal commensals, mostly affiliated with the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. Five out of 10 identified species were opportunistic pathogens. In conclusion, the touchscreens investigated here showed low bacterial loads and a species spectrum that is typical for frequently touched surfaces in domestic and public environments, the general health risk of which is still under debate.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2015-10-31","journal":"Folia Microbiologica","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Egert"],"firstnames":["Markus"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Späth"],"firstnames":["Kerstin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Weik"],"firstnames":["Karoline"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kunzelmann"],"firstnames":["Heike"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Horn"],"firstnames":["Christian"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kohl"],"firstnames":["Matthias"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Blessing"],"firstnames":["Frithjof"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2014","keywords":"Applied Microbiology, Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology, Immunology, Life Sciences, general, Microbiology","pages":"159–164","bibtex":"@article{egert_bacteria_2014,\n\ttitle = {Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a {German} university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products},\n\tvolume = {60},\n\tissn = {0015-5632, 1874-9356},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/article/10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2},\n\tabstract = {Smartphone touchscreens are known as pathogen carriers in clinical environments. However, despite a rapidly growing number of smartphone users worldwide, little is known about bacterial contamination of smartphone touchscreens in non-clinical settings. Such data are needed to better understand the hygienic relevance of these increasingly popular items. Here, 60 touchscreens of smartphones provided by randomly chosen students of a German university were sampled by directly touching them with contact agar plates. The average bacterial load of uncleaned touchscreens was 1.37 ± 0.33 CFU/cm2. Touchscreens wiped with commercially available microfiber cloths or alcohol-impregnated lens wipes contained significantly less bacteria than uncleaned touchscreens, i.e., 0.22 ± 0.10 CFU/cm2 and 0.06 ± 0.02 CFU/cm2, respectively. Bacteria isolated from cleaned and uncleaned touchscreens were identified by means of MALDI Biotyping. Out of 111 bacterial isolates, 56 isolates (50 \\%) were identified to genus level and 27 (24 \\%) to species level. The vast majority of the identified bacteria were typical human skin, mouth, lung, and intestinal commensals, mostly affiliated with the genera Staphylococcus and Micrococcus. Five out of 10 identified species were opportunistic pathogens. In conclusion, the touchscreens investigated here showed low bacterial loads and a species spectrum that is typical for frequently touched surfaces in domestic and public environments, the general health risk of which is still under debate.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2015-10-31},\n\tjournal = {Folia Microbiologica},\n\tauthor = {Egert, Markus and Späth, Kerstin and Weik, Karoline and Kunzelmann, Heike and Horn, Christian and Kohl, Matthias and Blessing, Frithjof},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tkeywords = {Applied Microbiology, Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology, Immunology, Life Sciences, general, Microbiology},\n\tpages = {159--164},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Egert, M.","Späth, K.","Weik, K.","Kunzelmann, H.","Horn, C.","Kohl, M.","Blessing, F."],"key":"egert_bacteria_2014","id":"egert_bacteria_2014","bibbaseid":"egert-spth-weik-kunzelmann-horn-kohl-blessing-bacteriaonsmartphonetouchscreensinagermanuniversitysettingandevaluationoftwopopularcleaningmethodsusingcommerciallyavailablecleaningproducts-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com.ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu/article/10.1007/s12223-014-0350-2"},"keyword":["Applied Microbiology","Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology","Immunology","Life Sciences","general","Microbiology"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/jabel","dataSources":["sWFw7a3qEGqRuCokd"],"keywords":["applied microbiology","environmental engineering/biotechnology","immunology","life sciences","general","microbiology"],"search_terms":["bacteria","smartphone","touchscreens","german","university","setting","evaluation","two","popular","cleaning","methods","using","commercially","available","cleaning","products","egert","späth","weik","kunzelmann","horn","kohl","blessing"],"title":"Bacteria on smartphone touchscreens in a German university setting and evaluation of two popular cleaning methods using commercially available cleaning products","year":2014}