Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks. Ehrlichman, H., Micic, D., Sousa, A., & Zhu, J. Brain Cogn, 64(1):7–20, 2007. Paper doi abstract bibtex It is not known why people move their eyes when engaged in non-visual cognition. The current study tested the hypothesis that differences in saccadic eye movement rate (EMR) during non-visual cognitive tasks reflect different requirements for searching long-term memory. Participants performed non-visual tasks requiring relatively low or high long-term memory retrieval while eye movements were recorded. In three experiments, EMR was substantially lower for low-retrieval than for high-retrieval tasks, including in an eyes closed condition in Experiment 3. Neither visual imagery nor between-task difficulty was related to EMR, although there was some evidence for a minor effect of within-task difficulty. Comparison of task-related EMRs to EMR during a no-task waiting period suggests that eye movements may be suppressed or activated depending on task requirements. We discuss a number of possible interpretations of saccadic eye movements during non-visual cognition and propose an evolutionary model that links these eye movements to memory search through an elaboration of circuitry involved in visual perception.
@article{ehrlichman_looking_2007,
title = {Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks},
volume = {64},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17113204},
doi = {10/b852jr},
abstract = {It is not known why people move their eyes when engaged in non-visual cognition. The current study tested the hypothesis that differences in saccadic eye movement rate (EMR) during non-visual cognitive tasks reflect different requirements for searching long-term memory. Participants performed non-visual tasks requiring relatively low or high long-term memory retrieval while eye movements were recorded. In three experiments, EMR was substantially lower for low-retrieval than for high-retrieval tasks, including in an eyes closed condition in Experiment 3. Neither visual imagery nor between-task difficulty was related to EMR, although there was some evidence for a minor effect of within-task difficulty. Comparison of task-related EMRs to EMR during a no-task waiting period suggests that eye movements may be suppressed or activated depending on task requirements. We discuss a number of possible interpretations of saccadic eye movements during non-visual cognition and propose an evolutionary model that links these eye movements to memory search through an elaboration of circuitry involved in visual perception.},
number = {1},
journal = {Brain Cogn},
author = {Ehrlichman, H. and Micic, D. and Sousa, A. and Zhu, J.},
year = {2007},
keywords = {\#nosource, *Memory, *Saccades, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Imagery (Psychotherapy), Male, Mental Recall, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time, Visual Pathways/physiology},
pages = {7--20},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"33quSeBX3M7c3uFZL","bibbaseid":"ehrlichman-micic-sousa-zhu-lookingforanswerseyemovementsinnonvisualcognitivetasks-2007","author_short":["Ehrlichman, H.","Micic, D.","Sousa, A.","Zhu, J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks","volume":"64","url":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17113204","doi":"10/b852jr","abstract":"It is not known why people move their eyes when engaged in non-visual cognition. The current study tested the hypothesis that differences in saccadic eye movement rate (EMR) during non-visual cognitive tasks reflect different requirements for searching long-term memory. Participants performed non-visual tasks requiring relatively low or high long-term memory retrieval while eye movements were recorded. In three experiments, EMR was substantially lower for low-retrieval than for high-retrieval tasks, including in an eyes closed condition in Experiment 3. Neither visual imagery nor between-task difficulty was related to EMR, although there was some evidence for a minor effect of within-task difficulty. Comparison of task-related EMRs to EMR during a no-task waiting period suggests that eye movements may be suppressed or activated depending on task requirements. We discuss a number of possible interpretations of saccadic eye movements during non-visual cognition and propose an evolutionary model that links these eye movements to memory search through an elaboration of circuitry involved in visual perception.","number":"1","journal":"Brain Cogn","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ehrlichman"],"firstnames":["H."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Micic"],"firstnames":["D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sousa"],"firstnames":["A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zhu"],"firstnames":["J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2007","keywords":"#nosource, *Memory, *Saccades, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Imagery (Psychotherapy), Male, Mental Recall, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time, Visual Pathways/physiology","pages":"7–20","bibtex":"@article{ehrlichman_looking_2007,\n\ttitle = {Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks},\n\tvolume = {64},\n\turl = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17113204},\n\tdoi = {10/b852jr},\n\tabstract = {It is not known why people move their eyes when engaged in non-visual cognition. The current study tested the hypothesis that differences in saccadic eye movement rate (EMR) during non-visual cognitive tasks reflect different requirements for searching long-term memory. Participants performed non-visual tasks requiring relatively low or high long-term memory retrieval while eye movements were recorded. In three experiments, EMR was substantially lower for low-retrieval than for high-retrieval tasks, including in an eyes closed condition in Experiment 3. Neither visual imagery nor between-task difficulty was related to EMR, although there was some evidence for a minor effect of within-task difficulty. Comparison of task-related EMRs to EMR during a no-task waiting period suggests that eye movements may be suppressed or activated depending on task requirements. We discuss a number of possible interpretations of saccadic eye movements during non-visual cognition and propose an evolutionary model that links these eye movements to memory search through an elaboration of circuitry involved in visual perception.},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Brain Cogn},\n\tauthor = {Ehrlichman, H. and Micic, D. and Sousa, A. and Zhu, J.},\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, *Memory, *Saccades, Analysis of Variance, Auditory Perception, Female, Humans, Imagery (Psychotherapy), Male, Mental Recall, Models, Neurological, Reaction Time, Visual Pathways/physiology},\n\tpages = {7--20},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ehrlichman, H.","Micic, D.","Sousa, A.","Zhu, J."],"key":"ehrlichman_looking_2007","id":"ehrlichman_looking_2007","bibbaseid":"ehrlichman-micic-sousa-zhu-lookingforanswerseyemovementsinnonvisualcognitivetasks-2007","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17113204"},"keyword":["#nosource","*Memory","*Saccades","Analysis of Variance","Auditory Perception","Female","Humans","Imagery (Psychotherapy)","Male","Mental Recall","Models","Neurological","Reaction Time","Visual Pathways/physiology"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/marsicanus","dataSources":["MDN92uztrK9rBiHJj"],"keywords":["#nosource","*memory","*saccades","analysis of variance","auditory perception","female","humans","imagery (psychotherapy)","male","mental recall","models","neurological","reaction time","visual pathways/physiology"],"search_terms":["looking","answers","eye","movements","non","visual","cognitive","tasks","ehrlichman","micic","sousa","zhu"],"title":"Looking for answers: eye movements in non-visual cognitive tasks","year":2007}