Expert Failure: Re-Evaluating Research Assessment. Eisen, J. A., MacCallum, C. J., & Neylon, C. 11(10):e1001677+.
Expert Failure: Re-Evaluating Research Assessment [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
It is unlikely that there is any single objective measure of merit, so research assessment therefore requires new multivariate metrics that reflect the context of research, regardless of discipline.
@article{eisenExpertFailureReevaluating2013,
  title = {Expert Failure: Re-Evaluating Research Assessment},
  author = {Eisen, Jonathan A. and MacCallum, Catriona J. and Neylon, Cameron},
  date = {2013-10},
  journaltitle = {PLoS Biol},
  volume = {11},
  pages = {e1001677+},
  issn = {1545-7885},
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pbio.1001677},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001677},
  abstract = {It is unlikely that there is any single objective measure of merit, so research assessment therefore requires new multivariate metrics that reflect the context of research, regardless of discipline.},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12720728,assessment,bibliometrics,citation-metrics,impact-factor,model-assessment,research-funding,research-metrics},
  number = {10}
}

Downloads: 0