Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study. Engelhardt, P. E Child Development Research, 2014(13):1–13, 2014. ![Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed ), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat? ). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat ). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.
@article{engelhardt2014childrens,
abstract = {This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed ), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat? ). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat ). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.},
author = {Engelhardt, Paul E},
doi = {10.1155/2014/475315},
issn = {2090-3987},
journal = {Child Development Research},
keywords = {Children},
mendeley-tags = {Children},
number = {13},
pages = {1--13},
title = {{Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study}},
url = {http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2014/475315/},
volume = {2014},
year = {2014}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"4BME2BiR9FdxS6DgQ","bibbaseid":"engelhardt-childrensandadolescentsprocessingoftemporarysyntacticambiguityaneyemovementstudy-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-11-27T00:02:44.952Z","title":"Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study","author_short":["Engelhardt, P. E"],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=17yCtnhUYe2_cCjKdNiRnui0ACkOmuoP_","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed ), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat? ). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat ). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Engelhardt"],"firstnames":["Paul","E"],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1155/2014/475315","issn":"2090-3987","journal":"Child Development Research","keywords":"Children","mendeley-tags":"Children","number":"13","pages":"1–13","title":"Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study","url":"http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2014/475315/","volume":"2014","year":"2014","bibtex":"@article{engelhardt2014childrens,\nabstract = {This study examined the eye movements of 24 children and adolescents as they read sentences containing temporary syntactic ambiguities. Prior research suggested that children primarily use grammatical information when making initial parsing decisions, and they tend to disregard semantic and contextual information. On each trial, participants read a garden path sentence (e.g., While the storm blew the boat sat in the shed ), and, afterwards, they answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did the storm blow the boat? ). The design was 2 × 2 (verb type × ambiguity) repeated measures. Verb type was optionally transitive or reflexive, and sentences were ambiguous or unambiguous. Results showed no differences in first pass reading times at the disambiguating verb (e.g., sat ). However, regressions did show a significant interaction. The unambiguous-reflexive condition had approximately half the number of regressions, suggesting less processing difficulty in this condition. Developmentally, we found that adolescents had significantly better comprehension, which seemed to be linked to the increased tendency to regress from the disambiguating word. Findings are consistent with the assumption that the processing architecture is more restricted in children compared to adolescents. In addition, results indicated that variance in ambiguity resolution was associated with interference control but not working memory.},\nauthor = {Engelhardt, Paul E},\ndoi = {10.1155/2014/475315},\nissn = {2090-3987},\njournal = {Child Development Research},\nkeywords = {Children},\nmendeley-tags = {Children},\nnumber = {13},\npages = {1--13},\ntitle = {{Children's and Adolescents' Processing of Temporary Syntactic Ambiguity: An Eye Movement Study}},\nurl = {http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2014/475315/},\nvolume = {2014},\nyear = {2014}\n}\n","author_short":["Engelhardt, P. E"],"key":"engelhardt2014childrens","id":"engelhardt2014childrens","bibbaseid":"engelhardt-childrensandadolescentsprocessingoftemporarysyntacticambiguityaneyemovementstudy-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cdr/2014/475315/"},"keyword":["Children"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["children","adolescents","processing","temporary","syntactic","ambiguity","eye","movement","study","engelhardt"],"keywords":["chilldren","children"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["4WgtMgzfDcrPHJL3s"]}