@Article{Engle1992,
  author      = {R. W. Engle and J. Cantor and J. J. Carullo},
  journal     = {J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn},
  title       = {Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.},
  year        = {1992},
  number      = {5},
  pages       = {972--992},
  volume      = {18},
  abstract    = {A relationship has consistently been found between measures of working
	memory and reading comprehension. Four hypotheses for this relationship
	were tested in 3 experiments. In the first 2 experiments, a moving
	window procedure was used to present the operation-word and reading
	span tasks. High- and low-span subjects did not differentially trade
	off time on the elements of the tasks and the to-be-remembered word.
	Furthermore, the correlation between span and comprehension was undiminished
	when the viewing times were partialed out. Experiment 3 compared
	a traditional experimenter-paced simple word-span and a subject-paced
	span in their relationship with comprehension. The experimenter-paced
	word-span correlated with comprehension but the subject-paced span
	did not. The results of all 3 experiments support a general capacity
	explanation for the relationship between working memory and comprehension.},
  institution = {Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.},
  keywords    = {Adult; Attention; Humans; Individuality; Memory, Short-Term; Mental Recall; Reaction Time; Reading; Retention (Psychology)},
  language    = {eng},
  medline-pst = {ppublish},
  pmid        = {1402719},
  timestamp   = {2011.02.24},
}

{"_id":"2QASyNFpLhcearuqE","bibbaseid":"engle-cantor-carullo-individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandcomprehensionatestoffourhypotheses-1992","author_short":["Engle, R. W.","Cantor, J.","Carullo, J. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["R.","W."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Engle"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["J."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cantor"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["J.","J."],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Carullo"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn","title":"Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.","year":"1992","number":"5","pages":"972–992","volume":"18","abstract":"A relationship has consistently been found between measures of working memory and reading comprehension. Four hypotheses for this relationship were tested in 3 experiments. In the first 2 experiments, a moving window procedure was used to present the operation-word and reading span tasks. High- and low-span subjects did not differentially trade off time on the elements of the tasks and the to-be-remembered word. Furthermore, the correlation between span and comprehension was undiminished when the viewing times were partialed out. Experiment 3 compared a traditional experimenter-paced simple word-span and a subject-paced span in their relationship with comprehension. The experimenter-paced word-span correlated with comprehension but the subject-paced span did not. The results of all 3 experiments support a general capacity explanation for the relationship between working memory and comprehension.","institution":"Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.","keywords":"Adult; Attention; Humans; Individuality; Memory, Short-Term; Mental Recall; Reaction Time; Reading; Retention (Psychology)","language":"eng","medline-pst":"ppublish","pmid":"1402719","timestamp":"2011.02.24","bibtex":"@Article{Engle1992,\n author = {R. W. Engle and J. Cantor and J. J. Carullo},\n journal = {J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn},\n title = {Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.},\n year = {1992},\n number = {5},\n pages = {972--992},\n volume = {18},\n abstract = {A relationship has consistently been found between measures of working\n\tmemory and reading comprehension. Four hypotheses for this relationship\n\twere tested in 3 experiments. In the first 2 experiments, a moving\n\twindow procedure was used to present the operation-word and reading\n\tspan tasks. High- and low-span subjects did not differentially trade\n\toff time on the elements of the tasks and the to-be-remembered word.\n\tFurthermore, the correlation between span and comprehension was undiminished\n\twhen the viewing times were partialed out. Experiment 3 compared\n\ta traditional experimenter-paced simple word-span and a subject-paced\n\tspan in their relationship with comprehension. The experimenter-paced\n\tword-span correlated with comprehension but the subject-paced span\n\tdid not. The results of all 3 experiments support a general capacity\n\texplanation for the relationship between working memory and comprehension.},\n institution = {Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.},\n keywords = {Adult; Attention; Humans; Individuality; Memory, Short-Term; Mental Recall; Reaction Time; Reading; Retention (Psychology)},\n language = {eng},\n medline-pst = {ppublish},\n pmid = {1402719},\n timestamp = {2011.02.24},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Engle, R. W.","Cantor, J.","Carullo, J. J."],"key":"Engle1992","id":"Engle1992","bibbaseid":"engle-cantor-carullo-individualdifferencesinworkingmemoryandcomprehensionatestoffourhypotheses-1992","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adult; Attention; Humans; Individuality; Memory","Short-Term; Mental Recall; Reaction Time; Reading; Retention (Psychology)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE"],"keywords":["adult; attention; humans; individuality; memory","short-term; mental recall; reaction time; reading; retention (psychology)"],"search_terms":["individual","differences","working","memory","comprehension","test","four","hypotheses","engle","cantor","carullo"],"title":"Individual differences in working memory and comprehension: a test of four hypotheses.","year":1992}