@article{falkner_risk_2015,
	title = {Risk management in {SMEs}: a systematic review of available evidence},
	volume = {16},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079},
	doi = {10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079},
	abstract = {Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review of available research evidence on risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The authors aim to reveal ambiguities, gaps and contradictions in the literature, and to sketch avenues for further research. Design/methodology/approach – The authors follow the tenets of Tranfield et al. (2003) for conducting a systematic literature review. Following a key word search and an assessment of fit for this review, 27 papers were analyzed with respect to bibliographical information, research design and findings. Findings – The review identified various types of risks that may occur in SMEs. In addition, the publication analysis demonstrates the importance of a risk management process in SMEs and that the characteristics of SME owners have a significant impact on their business strategies. Research limitations/implications – Additional empirical research on risk identification, risk analysis, strategy implementation and control in the SME risk management process is needed. Originality/value – This paper is the first comprehensive review of the body of literature on risk management in SMEs.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {The Journal of Risk Finance},
	author = {Falkner, Eva Maria and Hiebl, Martin R W},
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {CSCW},
	pages = {122--144},
}

{"_id":"AfoJjCtSZ77u5eZR3","bibbaseid":"falkner-hiebl-riskmanagementinsmesasystematicreviewofavailableevidence-2015","author_short":["Falkner, E. M.","Hiebl, M. R W"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence","volume":"16","url":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079","doi":"10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079","abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review of available research evidence on risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The authors aim to reveal ambiguities, gaps and contradictions in the literature, and to sketch avenues for further research. Design/methodology/approach – The authors follow the tenets of Tranfield et al. (2003) for conducting a systematic literature review. Following a key word search and an assessment of fit for this review, 27 papers were analyzed with respect to bibliographical information, research design and findings. Findings – The review identified various types of risks that may occur in SMEs. In addition, the publication analysis demonstrates the importance of a risk management process in SMEs and that the characteristics of SME owners have a significant impact on their business strategies. Research limitations/implications – Additional empirical research on risk identification, risk analysis, strategy implementation and control in the SME risk management process is needed. Originality/value – This paper is the first comprehensive review of the body of literature on risk management in SMEs.","number":"2","journal":"The Journal of Risk Finance","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Falkner"],"firstnames":["Eva","Maria"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hiebl"],"firstnames":["Martin","R","W"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2015","keywords":"CSCW","pages":"122–144","bibtex":"@article{falkner_risk_2015,\n\ttitle = {Risk management in {SMEs}: a systematic review of available evidence},\n\tvolume = {16},\n\turl = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079},\n\tdoi = {10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079},\n\tabstract = {Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic literature review of available research evidence on risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The authors aim to reveal ambiguities, gaps and contradictions in the literature, and to sketch avenues for further research. Design/methodology/approach – The authors follow the tenets of Tranfield et al. (2003) for conducting a systematic literature review. Following a key word search and an assessment of fit for this review, 27 papers were analyzed with respect to bibliographical information, research design and findings. Findings – The review identified various types of risks that may occur in SMEs. In addition, the publication analysis demonstrates the importance of a risk management process in SMEs and that the characteristics of SME owners have a significant impact on their business strategies. Research limitations/implications – Additional empirical research on risk identification, risk analysis, strategy implementation and control in the SME risk management process is needed. Originality/value – This paper is the first comprehensive review of the body of literature on risk management in SMEs.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {The Journal of Risk Finance},\n\tauthor = {Falkner, Eva Maria and Hiebl, Martin R W},\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {CSCW},\n\tpages = {122--144},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Falkner, E. M.","Hiebl, M. R W"],"key":"falkner_risk_2015","id":"falkner_risk_2015","bibbaseid":"falkner-hiebl-riskmanagementinsmesasystematicreviewofavailableevidence-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079"},"keyword":["CSCW"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/WinemeCSCW/2912317","dataSources":["Kxq3gH5SwaGv2DquW","suQH2QbCKNvwnAPoB","2aZf3F3Kjs6p26m56","hSFGrExiTp7kYXqj4"],"keywords":["cscw"],"search_terms":["risk","management","smes","systematic","review","available","evidence","falkner","hiebl"],"title":"Risk management in SMEs: a systematic review of available evidence","year":2015}