Bioinformatics and functional genomics. Fallis, A. Volume 53 , 2013. Paper abstract bibtex Predicting the binding mode of flexible polypeptides to proteins is an important task that falls outside the domain of applicability of most small molecule and protein−protein docking tools. Here, we test the small molecule flexible ligand docking program Glide on a set of 19 non-α-helical peptides and systematically improve pose prediction accuracy by enhancing Glide sampling for flexible polypeptides. In addition, scoring of the poses was improved by post-processing with physics-based implicit solvent MM- GBSA calculations. Using the best RMSD among the top 10 scoring poses as a metric, the success rate (RMSD ≤ 2.0 Å for the interface backbone atoms) increased from 21% with default Glide SP settings to 58% with the enhanced peptide sampling and scoring protocol in the case of redocking to the native protein structure. This approaches the accuracy of the recently developed Rosetta FlexPepDock method (63% success for these 19 peptides) while being over 100 times faster. Cross-docking was performed for a subset of cases where an unbound receptor structure was available, and in that case, 40% of peptides were docked successfully. We analyze the results and find that the optimized polypeptide protocol is most accurate for extended peptides of limited size and number of formal charges, defining a domain of applicability for this approach.
@book{
title = {Bioinformatics and functional genomics},
type = {book},
year = {2013},
source = {Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
keywords = {icle},
pages = {1689-1699},
volume = {53},
issue = {9},
id = {aa3ebfe3-cdb9-314f-b728-d52610b32ea6},
created = {2016-03-03T11:56:00.000Z},
file_attached = {true},
profile_id = {f95ef69b-8f96-32da-8de9-769c2acf0685},
group_id = {0ef73a44-75e8-35f5-b04a-84a4f9258e52},
last_modified = {2016-03-03T12:05:06.000Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
folder_uuids = {fe0af09b-f1d2-4862-b720-bae226a161a8},
abstract = {Predicting the binding mode of flexible polypeptides to proteins is an important task that falls outside the domain of applicability of most small molecule and protein−protein docking tools. Here, we test the small molecule flexible ligand docking program Glide on a set of 19 non-α-helical peptides and systematically improve pose prediction accuracy by enhancing Glide sampling for flexible polypeptides. In addition, scoring of the poses was improved by post-processing with physics-based implicit solvent MM- GBSA calculations. Using the best RMSD among the top 10 scoring poses as a metric, the success rate (RMSD ≤ 2.0 Å for the interface backbone atoms) increased from 21% with default Glide SP settings to 58% with the enhanced peptide sampling and scoring protocol in the case of redocking to the native protein structure. This approaches the accuracy of the recently developed Rosetta FlexPepDock method (63% success for these 19 peptides) while being over 100 times faster. Cross-docking was performed for a subset of cases where an unbound receptor structure was available, and in that case, 40% of peptides were docked successfully. We analyze the results and find that the optimized polypeptide protocol is most accurate for extended peptides of limited size and number of formal charges, defining a domain of applicability for this approach.},
bibtype = {book},
author = {Fallis, A.G}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"pemob7Jegs2x8bWz4","bibbaseid":"fallis-bioinformaticsandfunctionalgenomics-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-03-10T15:23:32.576Z","title":"Bioinformatics and functional genomics","author_short":["Fallis, A."],"year":2013,"bibtype":"book","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Bioinformatics and functional genomics","type":"book","year":"2013","source":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"icle","pages":"1689-1699","volume":"53","issue":"9","id":"aa3ebfe3-cdb9-314f-b728-d52610b32ea6","created":"2016-03-03T11:56:00.000Z","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"f95ef69b-8f96-32da-8de9-769c2acf0685","group_id":"0ef73a44-75e8-35f5-b04a-84a4f9258e52","last_modified":"2016-03-03T12:05:06.000Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"folder_uuids":"fe0af09b-f1d2-4862-b720-bae226a161a8","abstract":"Predicting the binding mode of flexible polypeptides to proteins is an important task that falls outside the domain of applicability of most small molecule and protein−protein docking tools. Here, we test the small molecule flexible ligand docking program Glide on a set of 19 non-α-helical peptides and systematically improve pose prediction accuracy by enhancing Glide sampling for flexible polypeptides. In addition, scoring of the poses was improved by post-processing with physics-based implicit solvent MM- GBSA calculations. Using the best RMSD among the top 10 scoring poses as a metric, the success rate (RMSD ≤ 2.0 Å for the interface backbone atoms) increased from 21% with default Glide SP settings to 58% with the enhanced peptide sampling and scoring protocol in the case of redocking to the native protein structure. This approaches the accuracy of the recently developed Rosetta FlexPepDock method (63% success for these 19 peptides) while being over 100 times faster. Cross-docking was performed for a subset of cases where an unbound receptor structure was available, and in that case, 40% of peptides were docked successfully. We analyze the results and find that the optimized polypeptide protocol is most accurate for extended peptides of limited size and number of formal charges, defining a domain of applicability for this approach.","bibtype":"book","author":"Fallis, A.G","bibtex":"@book{\n title = {Bioinformatics and functional genomics},\n type = {book},\n year = {2013},\n source = {Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {icle},\n pages = {1689-1699},\n volume = {53},\n issue = {9},\n id = {aa3ebfe3-cdb9-314f-b728-d52610b32ea6},\n created = {2016-03-03T11:56:00.000Z},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {f95ef69b-8f96-32da-8de9-769c2acf0685},\n group_id = {0ef73a44-75e8-35f5-b04a-84a4f9258e52},\n last_modified = {2016-03-03T12:05:06.000Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n folder_uuids = {fe0af09b-f1d2-4862-b720-bae226a161a8},\n abstract = {Predicting the binding mode of flexible polypeptides to proteins is an important task that falls outside the domain of applicability of most small molecule and protein−protein docking tools. Here, we test the small molecule flexible ligand docking program Glide on a set of 19 non-α-helical peptides and systematically improve pose prediction accuracy by enhancing Glide sampling for flexible polypeptides. In addition, scoring of the poses was improved by post-processing with physics-based implicit solvent MM- GBSA calculations. Using the best RMSD among the top 10 scoring poses as a metric, the success rate (RMSD ≤ 2.0 Å for the interface backbone atoms) increased from 21% with default Glide SP settings to 58% with the enhanced peptide sampling and scoring protocol in the case of redocking to the native protein structure. This approaches the accuracy of the recently developed Rosetta FlexPepDock method (63% success for these 19 peptides) while being over 100 times faster. Cross-docking was performed for a subset of cases where an unbound receptor structure was available, and in that case, 40% of peptides were docked successfully. We analyze the results and find that the optimized polypeptide protocol is most accurate for extended peptides of limited size and number of formal charges, defining a domain of applicability for this approach.},\n bibtype = {book},\n author = {Fallis, A.G}\n}","author_short":["Fallis, A."],"urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/f95ef69b-8f96-32da-8de9-769c2acf0685/file/7c33ef68-1b65-1ff5-79ec-5f71090a4e5e/2013-Bioinformatics_and_functional_genomics.pdf.pdf"},"bibbaseid":"fallis-bioinformaticsandfunctionalgenomics-2013","role":"author","keyword":["icle"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["bioinformatics","functional","genomics","fallis"],"keywords":["icle"],"authorIDs":[]}