Evidence of Australian bat lyssavirus infection in diverse Australian bat taxa. Field, H. E. Zoonoses and Public Health, 65(6):742–748, September, 2018. ![Evidence of Australian bat lyssavirus infection in diverse Australian bat taxa [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Historically, Australia was considered free of rabies and rabieslike viruses. Thus, the identification of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) in 1996 in a debilitated bat found by a member of the public precipitated both public health consternation and a revision of lyssavirus taxonomy. Subsequent observational studies sought to elaborate the occurrence and frequency of ABLV infection in Australian bats. This paper describes the taxonomic diversity of bat species showing evidence of ABLV infection to better inform public health considerations. Blood and/or brain samples were collected from two cohorts of bats (wild‐caught and diagnostic submissions) from four Australian states or territories between April 1996 and October 2002. Fresh brain impression smears were tested for ABLV antigen using fluorescein‐labelled anti‐rabies monoclonal globulin (CENTOCOR) in a direct fluorescent antibody test; sera were tested for the presence of neutralising antibodies using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. A total of 3,217 samples from 2,633 bats were collected and screened: brain samples from 1,461 wild‐caught bats and 1,086 submitted bats from at least 16 genera and seven families, and blood samples from 656 wild‐caught bats and 14 submitted bats from 14 genera and seven families. Evidence of ABLV infection was found in five of the six families of bats occurring in Australia, and in three of the four Australian states/territories surveyed, supporting the historic presence of the virus in Australia. While the infection prevalence in the wild‐caught cohort is evidently low, the significantly higher infection prevalence in rescued bats in urban settings represents a clear and present public health significance because of the higher risk of human exposure.
@article{field_evidence_2018,
title = {Evidence of {Australian} bat lyssavirus infection in diverse {Australian} bat taxa},
volume = {65},
issn = {1863-1959},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249124/},
doi = {10.1111/zph.12480},
abstract = {Historically, Australia was considered free of rabies and rabieslike viruses. Thus, the identification of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) in 1996 in a debilitated bat found by a member of the public precipitated both public health consternation and a revision of lyssavirus taxonomy. Subsequent observational studies sought to elaborate the occurrence and frequency of ABLV infection in Australian bats. This paper describes the taxonomic diversity of bat species showing evidence of ABLV infection to better inform public health considerations. Blood and/or brain samples were collected from two cohorts of bats (wild‐caught and diagnostic submissions) from four Australian states or territories between April 1996 and October 2002. Fresh brain impression smears were tested for ABLV antigen using fluorescein‐labelled anti‐rabies monoclonal globulin (CENTOCOR) in a direct fluorescent antibody test; sera were tested for the presence of neutralising antibodies using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. A total of 3,217 samples from 2,633 bats were collected and screened: brain samples from 1,461 wild‐caught bats and 1,086 submitted bats from at least 16 genera and seven families, and blood samples from 656 wild‐caught bats and 14 submitted bats from 14 genera and seven families. Evidence of ABLV infection was found in five of the six families of bats occurring in Australia, and in three of the four Australian states/territories surveyed, supporting the historic presence of the virus in Australia. While the infection prevalence in the wild‐caught cohort is evidently low, the significantly higher infection prevalence in rescued bats in urban settings represents a clear and present public health significance because of the higher risk of human exposure.},
number = {6},
urldate = {2023-06-06},
journal = {Zoonoses and Public Health},
author = {Field, Hume Ernest},
month = sep,
year = {2018},
pmid = {29785730},
pmcid = {PMC6249124},
pages = {742--748},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"zCCqJBX7aECDDBqz4","bibbaseid":"field-evidenceofaustralianbatlyssavirusinfectionindiverseaustralianbattaxa-2018","author_short":["Field, H. E."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Evidence of Australian bat lyssavirus infection in diverse Australian bat taxa","volume":"65","issn":"1863-1959","url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249124/","doi":"10.1111/zph.12480","abstract":"Historically, Australia was considered free of rabies and rabieslike viruses. Thus, the identification of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) in 1996 in a debilitated bat found by a member of the public precipitated both public health consternation and a revision of lyssavirus taxonomy. Subsequent observational studies sought to elaborate the occurrence and frequency of ABLV infection in Australian bats. This paper describes the taxonomic diversity of bat species showing evidence of ABLV infection to better inform public health considerations. Blood and/or brain samples were collected from two cohorts of bats (wild‐caught and diagnostic submissions) from four Australian states or territories between April 1996 and October 2002. Fresh brain impression smears were tested for ABLV antigen using fluorescein‐labelled anti‐rabies monoclonal globulin (CENTOCOR) in a direct fluorescent antibody test; sera were tested for the presence of neutralising antibodies using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. A total of 3,217 samples from 2,633 bats were collected and screened: brain samples from 1,461 wild‐caught bats and 1,086 submitted bats from at least 16 genera and seven families, and blood samples from 656 wild‐caught bats and 14 submitted bats from 14 genera and seven families. Evidence of ABLV infection was found in five of the six families of bats occurring in Australia, and in three of the four Australian states/territories surveyed, supporting the historic presence of the virus in Australia. While the infection prevalence in the wild‐caught cohort is evidently low, the significantly higher infection prevalence in rescued bats in urban settings represents a clear and present public health significance because of the higher risk of human exposure.","number":"6","urldate":"2023-06-06","journal":"Zoonoses and Public Health","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Field"],"firstnames":["Hume","Ernest"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"September","year":"2018","pmid":"29785730","pmcid":"PMC6249124","pages":"742–748","bibtex":"@article{field_evidence_2018,\n\ttitle = {Evidence of {Australian} bat lyssavirus infection in diverse {Australian} bat taxa},\n\tvolume = {65},\n\tissn = {1863-1959},\n\turl = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249124/},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/zph.12480},\n\tabstract = {Historically, Australia was considered free of rabies and rabieslike viruses. Thus, the identification of Australian bat lyssavirus (ABLV) in 1996 in a debilitated bat found by a member of the public precipitated both public health consternation and a revision of lyssavirus taxonomy. Subsequent observational studies sought to elaborate the occurrence and frequency of ABLV infection in Australian bats. This paper describes the taxonomic diversity of bat species showing evidence of ABLV infection to better inform public health considerations. Blood and/or brain samples were collected from two cohorts of bats (wild‐caught and diagnostic submissions) from four Australian states or territories between April 1996 and October 2002. Fresh brain impression smears were tested for ABLV antigen using fluorescein‐labelled anti‐rabies monoclonal globulin (CENTOCOR) in a direct fluorescent antibody test; sera were tested for the presence of neutralising antibodies using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. A total of 3,217 samples from 2,633 bats were collected and screened: brain samples from 1,461 wild‐caught bats and 1,086 submitted bats from at least 16 genera and seven families, and blood samples from 656 wild‐caught bats and 14 submitted bats from 14 genera and seven families. Evidence of ABLV infection was found in five of the six families of bats occurring in Australia, and in three of the four Australian states/territories surveyed, supporting the historic presence of the virus in Australia. While the infection prevalence in the wild‐caught cohort is evidently low, the significantly higher infection prevalence in rescued bats in urban settings represents a clear and present public health significance because of the higher risk of human exposure.},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2023-06-06},\n\tjournal = {Zoonoses and Public Health},\n\tauthor = {Field, Hume Ernest},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2018},\n\tpmid = {29785730},\n\tpmcid = {PMC6249124},\n\tpages = {742--748},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Field, H. E."],"key":"field_evidence_2018","id":"field_evidence_2018","bibbaseid":"field-evidenceofaustralianbatlyssavirusinfectionindiverseaustralianbattaxa-2018","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249124/"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/WildlifeTourismAustralia","dataSources":["3nygFjyMnirSMbcF3"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["evidence","australian","bat","lyssavirus","infection","diverse","australian","bat","taxa","field"],"title":"Evidence of Australian bat lyssavirus infection in diverse Australian bat taxa","year":2018}