Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal. Field, C. B. & Mach, K. J. Science, 356(6339):706–707, May, 2017. 00000 Paper doi abstract bibtex Proven approaches for limiting climate change include enhancing energy efficiency, capturing wind and solar energy, decreasing deforestation, and reducing industrial and agricultural emissions. These approaches are increasingly cost-competitive, consistent with large-scale use, and largely supported by public sentiment. Yet, the current pace of their deployment is far from sufficient for holding warming well below 2°C above preindustrial levels with high probability, the goal of the Paris Agreement. Two approaches for bridging this gap are widely discussed. First, the rate of decarbonization could be accelerated based on the above approaches. Second, continuing emissions could be compensated by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (1, 2). Technologies for carbon removal are mostly in their infancy, yet are increasingly asserted as key to climate policy. Here, we focus on rightsizing the expectations from carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky
@article{field_rightsizing_2017,
title = {Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal},
volume = {356},
copyright = {Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
url = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/706},
doi = {10.1126/science.aam9726},
abstract = {Proven approaches for limiting climate change include enhancing energy efficiency, capturing wind and solar energy, decreasing deforestation, and reducing industrial and agricultural emissions. These approaches are increasingly cost-competitive, consistent with large-scale use, and largely supported by public sentiment. Yet, the current pace of their deployment is far from sufficient for holding warming well below 2°C above preindustrial levels with high probability, the goal of the Paris Agreement. Two approaches for bridging this gap are widely discussed. First, the rate of decarbonization could be accelerated based on the above approaches. Second, continuing emissions could be compensated by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (1, 2). Technologies for carbon removal are mostly in their infancy, yet are increasingly asserted as key to climate policy. Here, we focus on rightsizing the expectations from carbon dioxide removal (CDR).
Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky
Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky},
language = {en},
number = {6339},
urldate = {2017-05-28},
journal = {Science},
author = {Field, Christopher B. and Mach, Katharine J.},
month = may,
year = {2017},
pmid = {28522498},
note = {00000 },
keywords = {climate, collapse, negative-emissions},
pages = {706--707},
file = {Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:C\:\\Users\\rsrs\\Documents\\Zotero Database\\storage\\NSKQK7P5\\Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:application/pdf}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"kfWepykDbJ4ScFWCb","bibbaseid":"field-mach-rightsizingcarbondioxideremoval-2017","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Field, C. B.","Mach, K. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal","volume":"356","copyright":"Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science","issn":"0036-8075, 1095-9203","url":"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/706","doi":"10.1126/science.aam9726","abstract":"Proven approaches for limiting climate change include enhancing energy efficiency, capturing wind and solar energy, decreasing deforestation, and reducing industrial and agricultural emissions. These approaches are increasingly cost-competitive, consistent with large-scale use, and largely supported by public sentiment. Yet, the current pace of their deployment is far from sufficient for holding warming well below 2°C above preindustrial levels with high probability, the goal of the Paris Agreement. Two approaches for bridging this gap are widely discussed. First, the rate of decarbonization could be accelerated based on the above approaches. Second, continuing emissions could be compensated by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (1, 2). Technologies for carbon removal are mostly in their infancy, yet are increasingly asserted as key to climate policy. Here, we focus on rightsizing the expectations from carbon dioxide removal (CDR). Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky Betting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky","language":"en","number":"6339","urldate":"2017-05-28","journal":"Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Field"],"firstnames":["Christopher","B."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mach"],"firstnames":["Katharine","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2017","pmid":"28522498","note":"00000 ","keywords":"climate, collapse, negative-emissions","pages":"706–707","file":"Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:C\\:\\\\Users\\s̊rs\\\\Documents\\\\Zotero Database\\\\storage\\\\NSKQK7P5\\\\Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{field_rightsizing_2017,\n\ttitle = {Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal},\n\tvolume = {356},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright © 2017, American Association for the Advancement of Science},\n\tissn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},\n\turl = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/706},\n\tdoi = {10.1126/science.aam9726},\n\tabstract = {Proven approaches for limiting climate change include enhancing energy efficiency, capturing wind and solar energy, decreasing deforestation, and reducing industrial and agricultural emissions. These approaches are increasingly cost-competitive, consistent with large-scale use, and largely supported by public sentiment. Yet, the current pace of their deployment is far from sufficient for holding warming well below 2°C above preindustrial levels with high probability, the goal of the Paris Agreement. Two approaches for bridging this gap are widely discussed. First, the rate of decarbonization could be accelerated based on the above approaches. Second, continuing emissions could be compensated by removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (1, 2). Technologies for carbon removal are mostly in their infancy, yet are increasingly asserted as key to climate policy. Here, we focus on rightsizing the expectations from carbon dioxide removal (CDR).\nBetting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky\nBetting the future on planetary-scale carbon dioxide removal from the atmosphere is risky},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {6339},\n\turldate = {2017-05-28},\n\tjournal = {Science},\n\tauthor = {Field, Christopher B. and Mach, Katharine J.},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpmid = {28522498},\n\tnote = {00000 },\n\tkeywords = {climate, collapse, negative-emissions},\n\tpages = {706--707},\n\tfile = {Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:C\\:\\\\Users\\\\rsrs\\\\Documents\\\\Zotero Database\\\\storage\\\\NSKQK7P5\\\\Field and Mach - 2017 - Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal.pdf:application/pdf}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Field, C. B.","Mach, K. J."],"key":"field_rightsizing_2017","id":"field_rightsizing_2017","bibbaseid":"field-mach-rightsizingcarbondioxideremoval-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/706"},"keyword":["climate","collapse","negative-emissions"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.collapsologie.fr/bib.bib","creationDate":"2019-06-13T15:56:08.639Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["climate","collapse","negative-emissions"],"search_terms":["rightsizing","carbon","dioxide","removal","field","mach"],"title":"Rightsizing carbon dioxide removal","year":2017,"dataSources":["97shAbFSxL7A7SHoh"]}