@Article{Filik2004,
  author   = {Ruth Filik and Kevin B Paterson and Simon P Liversedge},
  journal  = {Psychon Bull Rev},
  title    = {Processing doubly quantified sentences: {E}vidence from eye movements.},
  year     = {2004},
  number   = {5},
  pages    = {953-9},
  volume   = {11},
  abstract = {We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such
	as KeUy showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to
	whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents.
	Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier
	scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how
	many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking
	experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations
	were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the
	indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with
	the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified
	phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference
	for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude
	that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading
	but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors,
	unless required by secondary tasks.},
  keywords = {Eye Movements, Head, Humans, Linguistics, Mental Processes, Movement, Non-U.S. Gov't, Reading, Research Support, 15732709},
}

{"_id":"5SmhiAApF9FZHauCT","bibbaseid":"filik-paterson-liversedge-processingdoublyquantifiedsentencesevidencefromeyemovements-2004","author_short":["Filik, R.","Paterson, K. B","Liversedge, S. P"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Ruth"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Filik"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Kevin","B"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Paterson"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Simon","P"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Liversedge"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"Psychon Bull Rev","title":"Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements.","year":"2004","number":"5","pages":"953-9","volume":"11","abstract":"We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such as KeUy showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to whether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents. Ambiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier scope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how many entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking experiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations were singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the indirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with the on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified phrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference for singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude that relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading but may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors, unless required by secondary tasks.","keywords":"Eye Movements, Head, Humans, Linguistics, Mental Processes, Movement, Non-U.S. Gov't, Reading, Research Support, 15732709","bibtex":"@Article{Filik2004,\n author = {Ruth Filik and Kevin B Paterson and Simon P Liversedge},\n journal = {Psychon Bull Rev},\n title = {Processing doubly quantified sentences: {E}vidence from eye movements.},\n year = {2004},\n number = {5},\n pages = {953-9},\n volume = {11},\n abstract = {We investigated the processing of doubly quantified sentences, such\n\tas KeUy showed a photo to every critic, that are ambiguous as to\n\twhether the indefinite (a photo) specifies single or multiple referents.\n\tAmbiguity resolution requires the computation of relative quantifier\n\tscope: Whether a or every takes wide scope, thereby determining how\n\tmany entities or events are to be represented. In an eye-tracking\n\texperiment, we manipulated quantifier order and whether continuations\n\twere singular or plural, for constructions with the direct or the\n\tindirect object occurring first. We obtained effects consistent with\n\tthe on-line processing of relative scope at the doubly quantified\n\tphrase and considered two possible explanations for a preference\n\tfor singular continuations to the quantified sentence. We conclude\n\tthat relative quantifier scope is computed on line during reading\n\tbut may not be a prerequisite for the resolution of definite anaphors,\n\tunless required by secondary tasks.},\n keywords = {Eye Movements, Head, Humans, Linguistics, Mental Processes, Movement, Non-U.S. Gov't, Reading, Research Support, 15732709},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Filik, R.","Paterson, K. B","Liversedge, S. P"],"key":"Filik2004","id":"Filik2004","bibbaseid":"filik-paterson-liversedge-processingdoublyquantifiedsentencesevidencefromeyemovements-2004","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Eye Movements","Head","Humans","Linguistics","Mental Processes","Movement","Non-U.S. Gov't","Reading","Research Support","15732709"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["eye movements","head","humans","linguistics","mental processes","movement","non-u.s. gov't","reading","research support","15732709"],"search_terms":["processing","doubly","quantified","sentences","evidence","eye","movements","filik","paterson","liversedge"],"title":"Processing doubly quantified sentences: Evidence from eye movements.","year":2004}