@ARTICLE{Fodor1965,
  author = {Fodor, J. A. and Bever, T. G.},
  title = {The psychological reality of linguistic segments.},
  journal = {J V Learn Verb Beha},
  year = {1965},
  volume = {4},
  pages = {414--420},
  number = {5},
  abstract = {Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during
	speech supports the following conclusions: (1) Clicks are attracted
	towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material.
	(2) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the
	case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case
	of clicks located within segments. (3) These results are consistent
	with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure
	analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click
	displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units.
	(4) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material
	does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (5) There
	is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences.
	This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental
	session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the 2 ears.},
  issn = {0022-5371},
  keywords = {psychological reality, linguistic segments, speech, clicks, Linguistics,
	Oral Communication, Psychodynamics}
}

{"_id":"ApRwCwbxcozmDWDyu","bibbaseid":"fodor-bever-thepsychologicalrealityoflinguisticsegments-1965","author_short":["Fodor, J. A.","Bever, T. G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fodor"],"firstnames":["J.","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bever"],"firstnames":["T.","G."],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"The psychological reality of linguistic segments.","journal":"J V Learn Verb Beha","year":"1965","volume":"4","pages":"414–420","number":"5","abstract":"Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during speech supports the following conclusions: (1) Clicks are attracted towards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material. (2) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the case of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case of clicks located within segments. (3) These results are consistent with the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure analysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click displacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units. (4) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material does not account for the observed distribution of errors. (5) There is a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences. This tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental session. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the 2 ears.","issn":"0022-5371","keywords":"psychological reality, linguistic segments, speech, clicks, Linguistics, Oral Communication, Psychodynamics","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Fodor1965,\n author = {Fodor, J. A. and Bever, T. G.},\n title = {The psychological reality of linguistic segments.},\n journal = {J V Learn Verb Beha},\n year = {1965},\n volume = {4},\n pages = {414--420},\n number = {5},\n abstract = {Experimentation with the subjective location of clicks heard during\n\tspeech supports the following conclusions: (1) Clicks are attracted\n\ttowards the nearest major syntactic boundaries in sentential material.\n\t(2) The number of correct responses is significantly higher in the\n\tcase of clicks located at major segment boundaries than in the case\n\tof clicks located within segments. (3) These results are consistent\n\twith the view that the segments marked by formal constituent structure\n\tanalysis in fact function as perceptual units and that the click\n\tdisplacement is an effect which insures the integrity of these units.\n\t(4) The distribution of acoustic pauses in the sentential material\n\tdoes not account for the observed distribution of errors. (5) There\n\tis a slight tendency to prepose responses to clicks in sentences.\n\tThis tendency is reversed during later stages of the experimental\n\tsession. Both these effects are asymmetrical for the 2 ears.},\n issn = {0022-5371},\n keywords = {psychological reality, linguistic segments, speech, clicks, Linguistics,\n\tOral Communication, Psychodynamics}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Fodor, J. A.","Bever, T. G."],"key":"Fodor1965","id":"Fodor1965","bibbaseid":"fodor-bever-thepsychologicalrealityoflinguisticsegments-1965","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["psychological reality","linguistic segments","speech","clicks","Linguistics","Oral Communication","Psychodynamics"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["psychological reality","linguistic segments","speech","clicks","linguistics","oral communication","psychodynamics"],"search_terms":["psychological","reality","linguistic","segments","fodor","bever"],"title":"The psychological reality of linguistic segments.","year":1965}