How advances in technology keep reducing interventionist policy rationales. Foldvary, F. E. & Hammer, E. J. Technology in Society, 47:16--24, November, 2016. Paper doi abstract bibtex Rationales for government interventions in the market are typically based on theories of market failure set within a framework of fixed private-sector practices and technologies. However, continuous technological progress and entrepreneurial innovation are eroding the theoretical foundations of these policies, making them increasingly obsolete. This paper describes the four pillars of market failure doctrine and provides examples of how the market is using technology to solve problems previously considered to necessitate government intervention.
@article{foldvary_how_2016,
title = {How advances in technology keep reducing interventionist policy rationales},
volume = {47},
issn = {0160-791X},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15300580},
doi = {10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.07.003},
abstract = {Rationales for government interventions in the market are typically based on theories of market failure set within a framework of fixed private-sector practices and technologies. However, continuous technological progress and entrepreneurial innovation are eroding the theoretical foundations of these policies, making them increasingly obsolete. This paper describes the four pillars of market failure doctrine and provides examples of how the market is using technology to solve problems previously considered to necessitate government intervention.},
urldate = {2016-07-27},
journal = {Technology in Society},
author = {Foldvary, Fred E. and Hammer, Eric J.},
month = nov,
year = {2016},
keywords = {Information, Market failure, Policy, property rights, Technology},
pages = {16--24},
file = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/56143/Foldvary and Hammer - 2016 - How advances in technology keep reducing intervent.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/56144/S0160791X15300580.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"mXhCsxa5WxmDp7bgn","bibbaseid":"foldvary-hammer-howadvancesintechnologykeepreducinginterventionistpolicyrationales-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:36.106Z","title":"How advances in technology keep reducing interventionist policy rationales","author_short":["Foldvary, F. E.","Hammer, E. J."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"How advances in technology keep reducing interventionist policy rationales","volume":"47","issn":"0160-791X","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15300580","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.07.003","abstract":"Rationales for government interventions in the market are typically based on theories of market failure set within a framework of fixed private-sector practices and technologies. However, continuous technological progress and entrepreneurial innovation are eroding the theoretical foundations of these policies, making them increasingly obsolete. This paper describes the four pillars of market failure doctrine and provides examples of how the market is using technology to solve problems previously considered to necessitate government intervention.","urldate":"2016-07-27","journal":"Technology in Society","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Foldvary"],"firstnames":["Fred","E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hammer"],"firstnames":["Eric","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2016","keywords":"Information, Market failure, Policy, property rights, Technology","pages":"16--24","file":"ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/56143/Foldvary and Hammer - 2016 - How advances in technology keep reducing intervent.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/56144/S0160791X15300580.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{foldvary_how_2016,\n\ttitle = {How advances in technology keep reducing interventionist policy rationales},\n\tvolume = {47},\n\tissn = {0160-791X},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15300580},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.techsoc.2016.07.003},\n\tabstract = {Rationales for government interventions in the market are typically based on theories of market failure set within a framework of fixed private-sector practices and technologies. However, continuous technological progress and entrepreneurial innovation are eroding the theoretical foundations of these policies, making them increasingly obsolete. This paper describes the four pillars of market failure doctrine and provides examples of how the market is using technology to solve problems previously considered to necessitate government intervention.},\n\turldate = {2016-07-27},\n\tjournal = {Technology in Society},\n\tauthor = {Foldvary, Fred E. and Hammer, Eric J.},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tkeywords = {Information, Market failure, Policy, property rights, Technology},\n\tpages = {16--24},\n\tfile = {ScienceDirect Full Text PDF:files/56143/Foldvary and Hammer - 2016 - How advances in technology keep reducing intervent.pdf:application/pdf;ScienceDirect Snapshot:files/56144/S0160791X15300580.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Foldvary, F. E.","Hammer, E. J."],"key":"foldvary_how_2016","id":"foldvary_how_2016","bibbaseid":"foldvary-hammer-howadvancesintechnologykeepreducinginterventionistpolicyrationales-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X15300580"},"keyword":["Information","Market failure","Policy","property rights","Technology"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["advances","technology","keep","reducing","interventionist","policy","rationales","foldvary","hammer"],"keywords":["information","market failure","policy","property rights","technology"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}