Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes. Font, J., Wojcieszak, M., & Navarro, C. J. Political Studies, March, 2015. ![Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex In this article, it is shown that citizen process preferences are complex and include several dimensions. The argument relies on data from a representative sample of Spanish citizens (N = 2,450) to assess these dimensions. Using confirmatory factor analysis as well as Mokken analysis, it is shown that citizen process preferences capture support for three different models: participatory, representative and expert-based. The relationships between these dimensions (where the opposition between representation and participation stands as the clearest result) and the substantive and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.
@article{font_participation_2015,
title = {Participation, {Representation} and {Expertise}: {Citizen} {Preferences} for {Political} {Decision}-{Making} {Processes}},
copyright = {© 2015 The Authors. Political Studies © 2015 Political Studies Association},
issn = {1467-9248},
shorttitle = {Participation, {Representation} and {Expertise}},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12191/abstract},
doi = {10.1111/1467-9248.12191},
abstract = {In this article, it is shown that citizen process preferences are complex and include several dimensions. The argument relies on data from a representative sample of Spanish citizens (N = 2,450) to assess these dimensions. Using confirmatory factor analysis as well as Mokken analysis, it is shown that citizen process preferences capture support for three different models: participatory, representative and expert-based. The relationships between these dimensions (where the opposition between representation and participation stands as the clearest result) and the substantive and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2015-02-17},
journal = {Political Studies},
author = {Font, Joan and Wojcieszak, Magdalena and Navarro, Clemente J.},
month = mar,
year = {2015},
keywords = {Democracy, expert governance, participation, process preferences, stealth democracy},
pages = {n/a--n/a},
file = {Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:files/50868/Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:files/50867/abstract.html:text/html}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"7NcFk6uRaEeQ6bjLm","bibbaseid":"font-wojcieszak-navarro-participationrepresentationandexpertisecitizenpreferencesforpoliticaldecisionmakingprocesses-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-09-09T06:27:34.188Z","title":"Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes","author_short":["Font, J.","Wojcieszak, M.","Navarro, C. J."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://www.sfu.ca/~howlett/howlett16.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Participation, Representation and Expertise: Citizen Preferences for Political Decision-Making Processes","copyright":"© 2015 The Authors. Political Studies © 2015 Political Studies Association","issn":"1467-9248","shorttitle":"Participation, Representation and Expertise","url":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12191/abstract","doi":"10.1111/1467-9248.12191","abstract":"In this article, it is shown that citizen process preferences are complex and include several dimensions. The argument relies on data from a representative sample of Spanish citizens (N = 2,450) to assess these dimensions. Using confirmatory factor analysis as well as Mokken analysis, it is shown that citizen process preferences capture support for three different models: participatory, representative and expert-based. The relationships between these dimensions (where the opposition between representation and participation stands as the clearest result) and the substantive and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.","language":"en","urldate":"2015-02-17","journal":"Political Studies","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Font"],"firstnames":["Joan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wojcieszak"],"firstnames":["Magdalena"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Navarro"],"firstnames":["Clemente","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2015","keywords":"Democracy, expert governance, participation, process preferences, stealth democracy","pages":"n/a--n/a","file":"Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:files/50868/Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:files/50867/abstract.html:text/html","bibtex":"@article{font_participation_2015,\n\ttitle = {Participation, {Representation} and {Expertise}: {Citizen} {Preferences} for {Political} {Decision}-{Making} {Processes}},\n\tcopyright = {© 2015 The Authors. Political Studies © 2015 Political Studies Association},\n\tissn = {1467-9248},\n\tshorttitle = {Participation, {Representation} and {Expertise}},\n\turl = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12191/abstract},\n\tdoi = {10.1111/1467-9248.12191},\n\tabstract = {In this article, it is shown that citizen process preferences are complex and include several dimensions. The argument relies on data from a representative sample of Spanish citizens (N = 2,450) to assess these dimensions. Using confirmatory factor analysis as well as Mokken analysis, it is shown that citizen process preferences capture support for three different models: participatory, representative and expert-based. The relationships between these dimensions (where the opposition between representation and participation stands as the clearest result) and the substantive and methodological implications of these findings are discussed.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2015-02-17},\n\tjournal = {Political Studies},\n\tauthor = {Font, Joan and Wojcieszak, Magdalena and Navarro, Clemente J.},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Democracy, expert governance, participation, process preferences, stealth democracy},\n\tpages = {n/a--n/a},\n\tfile = {Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:files/50868/Font_et_al-2015-Political_Studies.pdf:application/pdf;Snapshot:files/50867/abstract.html:text/html}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Font, J.","Wojcieszak, M.","Navarro, C. J."],"key":"font_participation_2015","id":"font_participation_2015","bibbaseid":"font-wojcieszak-navarro-participationrepresentationandexpertisecitizenpreferencesforpoliticaldecisionmakingprocesses-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9248.12191/abstract"},"keyword":["Democracy","expert governance","participation","process preferences","stealth democracy"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["participation","representation","expertise","citizen","preferences","political","decision","making","processes","font","wojcieszak","navarro"],"keywords":["democracy","expert governance","participation","process preferences","stealth democracy"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Bn7xRaKMY43f7hFwh"]}