Maxwell’s demon and the management of ignorance in stochastic thermodynamics. Ford, I. Contemporary Physics, 57(3):309–330, 2016. 1doi abstract bibtex It is nearly 150 years since Maxwell challenged the validity of the second law of thermodynamics by imagining a tiny creature who could sort the molecules of a gas in such a way that would decrease entropy without exerting any work. The demon has been discussed largely using thought experiments, but it has recently become possible to exert control over nanoscale systems, just as Maxwell imagined, and the status of the second law has become a more practical matter, raising the issue of how measurements manage our ignorance in a way that can be exploited. The framework of stochastic thermodynamics extends macroscopic concepts such as heat, work, entropy and irreversibility to small systems and allows us explore the matter. Some arguments against a successful demon imply a second law that can be suspended indefinitely until we dissipate energy in order to remove the records of his operations. In contrast, under stochastic thermodynamics, the demon fails because on average, more work is performed upfront in making a measurement than can be extracted by exploiting the outcome. This requires us to exclude systems and a demon that evolve under what might be termed self-sorting dynamics, and we reflect on the constraints on control that this implies while still working within a thermodynamic framework. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
@article{ford_maxwells_2016,
title = {Maxwell’s demon and the management of ignorance in stochastic thermodynamics},
volume = {57},
doi = {10.1080/00107514.2015.1121604},
abstract = {It is nearly 150 years since Maxwell challenged the validity of the second law of thermodynamics by imagining a tiny creature who could sort the molecules of a gas in such a way that would decrease entropy without exerting any work. The demon has been discussed largely using thought experiments, but it has recently become possible to exert control over nanoscale systems, just as Maxwell imagined, and the status of the second law has become a more practical matter, raising the issue of how measurements manage our ignorance in a way that can be exploited. The framework of stochastic thermodynamics extends macroscopic concepts such as heat, work, entropy and irreversibility to small systems and allows us explore the matter. Some arguments against a successful demon imply a second law that can be suspended indefinitely until we dissipate energy in order to remove the records of his operations. In contrast, under stochastic thermodynamics, the demon fails because on average, more work is performed upfront in making a measurement than can be extracted by exploiting the outcome. This requires us to exclude systems and a demon that evolve under what might be termed self-sorting dynamics, and we reflect on the constraints on control that this implies while still working within a thermodynamic framework. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \& Francis Group.},
number = {3},
journal = {Contemporary Physics},
author = {Ford, I.J.},
year = {2016},
note = {1},
keywords = {1 Learned ignorance, Ignorance savante, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Second law of thermodynamics, entropy production, irreversibility, measurement},
pages = {309--330},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"LGbtK3eN6z5vMfP9T","bibbaseid":"ford-maxwellsdemonandthemanagementofignoranceinstochasticthermodynamics-2016","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-09-05T12:55:56.318Z","title":"Maxwell’s demon and the management of ignorance in stochastic thermodynamics","author_short":["Ford, I."],"year":2016,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Maxwell’s demon and the management of ignorance in stochastic thermodynamics","volume":"57","doi":"10.1080/00107514.2015.1121604","abstract":"It is nearly 150 years since Maxwell challenged the validity of the second law of thermodynamics by imagining a tiny creature who could sort the molecules of a gas in such a way that would decrease entropy without exerting any work. The demon has been discussed largely using thought experiments, but it has recently become possible to exert control over nanoscale systems, just as Maxwell imagined, and the status of the second law has become a more practical matter, raising the issue of how measurements manage our ignorance in a way that can be exploited. The framework of stochastic thermodynamics extends macroscopic concepts such as heat, work, entropy and irreversibility to small systems and allows us explore the matter. Some arguments against a successful demon imply a second law that can be suspended indefinitely until we dissipate energy in order to remove the records of his operations. In contrast, under stochastic thermodynamics, the demon fails because on average, more work is performed upfront in making a measurement than can be extracted by exploiting the outcome. This requires us to exclude systems and a demon that evolve under what might be termed self-sorting dynamics, and we reflect on the constraints on control that this implies while still working within a thermodynamic framework. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.","number":"3","journal":"Contemporary Physics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ford"],"firstnames":["I.J."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","note":"1","keywords":"1 Learned ignorance, Ignorance savante, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Second law of thermodynamics, entropy production, irreversibility, measurement","pages":"309–330","bibtex":"@article{ford_maxwells_2016,\n\ttitle = {Maxwell’s demon and the management of ignorance in stochastic thermodynamics},\n\tvolume = {57},\n\tdoi = {10.1080/00107514.2015.1121604},\n\tabstract = {It is nearly 150 years since Maxwell challenged the validity of the second law of thermodynamics by imagining a tiny creature who could sort the molecules of a gas in such a way that would decrease entropy without exerting any work. The demon has been discussed largely using thought experiments, but it has recently become possible to exert control over nanoscale systems, just as Maxwell imagined, and the status of the second law has become a more practical matter, raising the issue of how measurements manage our ignorance in a way that can be exploited. The framework of stochastic thermodynamics extends macroscopic concepts such as heat, work, entropy and irreversibility to small systems and allows us explore the matter. Some arguments against a successful demon imply a second law that can be suspended indefinitely until we dissipate energy in order to remove the records of his operations. In contrast, under stochastic thermodynamics, the demon fails because on average, more work is performed upfront in making a measurement than can be extracted by exploiting the outcome. This requires us to exclude systems and a demon that evolve under what might be termed self-sorting dynamics, and we reflect on the constraints on control that this implies while still working within a thermodynamic framework. © 2016 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor \\& Francis Group.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Contemporary Physics},\n\tauthor = {Ford, I.J.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tnote = {1},\n\tkeywords = {1 Learned ignorance, Ignorance savante, PRINTED (Fonds papier), Second law of thermodynamics, entropy production, irreversibility, measurement},\n\tpages = {309--330},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ford, I."],"key":"ford_maxwells_2016","id":"ford_maxwells_2016","bibbaseid":"ford-maxwellsdemonandthemanagementofignoranceinstochasticthermodynamics-2016","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["1 Learned ignorance","Ignorance savante","PRINTED (Fonds papier)","Second law of thermodynamics","entropy production","irreversibility","measurement"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["maxwell","demon","management","ignorance","stochastic","thermodynamics","ford"],"keywords":["1 learned ignorance","ignorance savante","printed (fonds papier)","second law of thermodynamics","entropy production","irreversibility","measurement"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7","NTvuMntpta5z9CAbT"]}