How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification. Fortino, W. F., Bianco, F. B., Modjaz, M., Matheson, T., & Zubair, U. July, 2026. arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]
How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, $R_λ = {\}fracλ\{Δλ\}$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of $R_λ$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each $R_λ$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to $R_λ = 50$ and ${\}text\{SNR\} = 5$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as $R_λ = 25$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary \SNR\\.
@misc{fortino_how_2026,
	title = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}? {Minimum} {Spectroscopic} {Requirements} {For} {Supernova} {Subtype} {Classification}},
	shorttitle = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}?},
	url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03532},
	doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2607.03532},
	abstract = {Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, \$R\_λ = {\textbackslash}fracλ\{Δλ\}\$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of \$R\_λ\$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each \$R\_λ\$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to \$R\_λ = 50\$ and \${\textbackslash}text\{SNR\} = 5\$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as \$R\_λ = 25\$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary {\textbackslash}SNR\{\}.},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2026-07-15},
	publisher = {arXiv},
	author = {Fortino, Willow Fox and Bianco, Federica B. and Modjaz, Maryam and Matheson, Thomas and Zubair, Umer},
	month = jul,
	year = {2026},
	note = {arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]},
	keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, WG: Explorable},
}

Downloads: 0