How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification. Fortino, W. F., Bianco, F. B., Modjaz, M., Matheson, T., & Zubair, U. July, 2026. arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]
Paper doi abstract bibtex Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, $R_λ = {\}fracλ\{Δλ\}$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of $R_λ$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each $R_λ$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to $R_λ = 50$ and ${\}text\{SNR\} = 5$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as $R_λ = 25$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary \SNR\\.
@misc{fortino_how_2026,
title = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}? {Minimum} {Spectroscopic} {Requirements} {For} {Supernova} {Subtype} {Classification}},
shorttitle = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}?},
url = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03532},
doi = {10.48550/arXiv.2607.03532},
abstract = {Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, \$R\_λ = {\textbackslash}fracλ\{Δλ\}\$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of \$R\_λ\$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each \$R\_λ\$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to \$R\_λ = 50\$ and \${\textbackslash}text\{SNR\} = 5\$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as \$R\_λ = 25\$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary {\textbackslash}SNR\{\}.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2026-07-15},
publisher = {arXiv},
author = {Fortino, Willow Fox and Bianco, Federica B. and Modjaz, Maryam and Matheson, Thomas and Zubair, Umer},
month = jul,
year = {2026},
note = {arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]},
keywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, WG: Explorable},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"tELwgiW2Khq8jxK74","bibbaseid":"fortino-bianco-modjaz-matheson-zubair-howlowcanwegominimumspectroscopicrequirementsforsupernovasubtypeclassification-2026","author_short":["Fortino, W. F.","Bianco, F. B.","Modjaz, M.","Matheson, T.","Zubair, U."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"misc","type":"misc","title":"How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification","shorttitle":"How Low Can We Go?","url":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03532","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2607.03532","abstract":"Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, $R_λ = {\\}fracλ\\{Δλ\\}$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of $R_λ$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each $R_λ$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to $R_λ = 50$ and ${\\}text\\{SNR\\} = 5$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as $R_λ = 25$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary \\SNR\\\\.","language":"en","urldate":"2026-07-15","publisher":"arXiv","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fortino"],"firstnames":["Willow","Fox"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bianco"],"firstnames":["Federica","B."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Modjaz"],"firstnames":["Maryam"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Matheson"],"firstnames":["Thomas"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Zubair"],"firstnames":["Umer"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"July","year":"2026","note":"arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]","keywords":"Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, WG: Explorable","bibtex":"@misc{fortino_how_2026,\n\ttitle = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}? {Minimum} {Spectroscopic} {Requirements} {For} {Supernova} {Subtype} {Classification}},\n\tshorttitle = {How {Low} {Can} {We} {Go}?},\n\turl = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03532},\n\tdoi = {10.48550/arXiv.2607.03532},\n\tabstract = {Millions of supernovae will be discovered with the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). As a result, spectrographs around the world will have to make difficult decisions about which supernova candidates receive spectroscopic follow-ups. This work identifies the minimum spectral resolution, \\$R\\_λ = {\\textbackslash}fracλ\\{Δλ\\}\\$, as a function of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at which spectral classification of supernova subtypes becomes impossible. We include supernova types Ia, Ia-91T, Ia-91bg, Iax, Ib, Ic, broad-lined Ic, IIb, IIP, and Ibn in this work. We produce a definition of SNR based on specific lines for each SN subtype that allows us to generate homogeneous datasets at 16 different values of \\$R\\_λ\\$ and 14 different SNR's and we tested the classification performance of a recently developed deep-learning classifier, ABC-SN, on each \\$R\\_λ\\$ and SNR combination. We find that classification of supernova spectra into a refined taxonomy that separates, for example, between different subtypes of stripped envelope supernovae, is possible at low resolution and low SNR with no loss in model performance down to \\$R\\_λ = 50\\$ and \\${\\textbackslash}text\\{SNR\\} = 5\\$. Classification performance is only minimally impacted even as low as \\$R\\_λ = 25\\$. We hope that astronomers using the LSST alert stream, as well as designers of future instruments and observatories, will benefit from knowing what spectral resolution is necessary to classify a supernova for arbitrary {\\textbackslash}SNR\\{\\}.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2026-07-15},\n\tpublisher = {arXiv},\n\tauthor = {Fortino, Willow Fox and Bianco, Federica B. and Modjaz, Maryam and Matheson, Thomas and Zubair, Umer},\n\tmonth = jul,\n\tyear = {2026},\n\tnote = {arXiv:2607.03532 [astro-ph.IM]},\n\tkeywords = {Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics, WG: Explorable},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Fortino, W. F.","Bianco, F. B.","Modjaz, M.","Matheson, T.","Zubair, U."],"key":"fortino_how_2026","id":"fortino_how_2026","bibbaseid":"fortino-bianco-modjaz-matheson-zubair-howlowcanwegominimumspectroscopicrequirementsforsupernovasubtypeclassification-2026","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://arxiv.org/abs/2607.03532"},"keyword":["Astrophysics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena","Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics","Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics","WG: Explorable"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"misc","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/pratikmhatre/5933976","dataSources":["yJr5AAtJ5Sz3Q4WT4"],"keywords":["astrophysics - high energy astrophysical phenomena","astrophysics - instrumentation and methods for astrophysics","astrophysics - solar and stellar astrophysics","wg: explorable"],"search_terms":["low","minimum","spectroscopic","requirements","supernova","subtype","classification","fortino","bianco","modjaz","matheson","zubair"],"title":"How Low Can We Go? Minimum Spectroscopic Requirements For Supernova Subtype Classification","year":2026}