Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure. Franke, O., Narducci, F., Chereau-Ewald, E., Orsoni, M., Jauffret, C., Leblanc, E., Houvenaeghel, G., & Lambaudie, E. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 25(2):331–6, 2015.
Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that robotically assisted laparoscopy for aortic lymph node dissection was improved when double docking (DD) of the Da Vinci system is used for combined surgical procedures [defined by the combination of a pelvic procedure and a para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL)]. METHODS: From February 2007 to February 2013, 41 patients underwent combined procedures including PAL up to the left renal vein in 2 cancer centers. We used 2 different approaches as follows: a single docking (SD) of the Da Vinci system (transperitoneal PAL and pelvic surgery) during the first period (22 patients) and a DD during the second period (19 patients). We recorded retrospectively the lymph node count (main criteria), operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We observed a statistical difference between SD and DD concerning aortic lymph node count (5.86 vs 10.89, P \textbackslashtextbackslashtextless 0.005). Operative time is longer in the DD group (326.1 vs 239.4 minutes, P \textbackslashtextbackslashtextless 0.05). No difference was observed concerning estimated blood loss. Hospital stay was longer in the DD group (4.9 vs 3.2 days, P \textbackslashtextbackslashtextless 0.05). Only 1 conversion to open was described in the SD group. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of robotically assisted laparoscopy, when PAL is combined to a pelvic procedure, the use of a DD seems to improve aortic lymph node count.Despite a longer operative time compared to SD, DD seems to be a good solution to combine the advantages of robotic assistance to our quality criteria of aortic dissection. SYNOPSIS: We compare 2 techniques to realize robotic assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy combined with pelvic procedure. Double docking seems to improve histological results compared to single docking.
@article{franke_role_2015,
	title = {Role of a double docking to improve lymph node dissection: when robotically assisted laparoscopy for para-aortic lymphadenectomy is associated to a pelvic procedure},
	volume = {25},
	issn = {1525-1438 (Electronic) 1048-891X (Linking)},
	url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25514349},
	doi = {10.1097/IGC.0000000000000338},
	abstract = {OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to demonstrate that robotically assisted laparoscopy for aortic lymph node dissection was improved when double docking (DD) of the Da Vinci system is used for combined surgical procedures [defined by the combination of a pelvic procedure and a para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PAL)]. METHODS: From February 2007 to February 2013, 41 patients underwent combined procedures including PAL up to the left renal vein in 2 cancer centers. We used 2 different approaches as follows: a single docking (SD) of the Da Vinci system (transperitoneal PAL and pelvic surgery) during the first period (22 patients) and a DD during the second period (19 patients). We recorded retrospectively the lymph node count (main criteria), operative time, estimated blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We observed a statistical difference between SD and DD concerning aortic lymph node count (5.86 vs 10.89, P {\textbackslash}textbackslashtextless 0.005). Operative time is longer in the DD group (326.1 vs 239.4 minutes, P {\textbackslash}textbackslashtextless 0.05). No difference was observed concerning estimated blood loss. Hospital stay was longer in the DD group (4.9 vs 3.2 days, P {\textbackslash}textbackslashtextless 0.05). Only 1 conversion to open was described in the SD group. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of robotically assisted laparoscopy, when PAL is combined to a pelvic procedure, the use of a DD seems to improve aortic lymph node count.Despite a longer operative time compared to SD, DD seems to be a good solution to combine the advantages of robotic assistance to our quality criteria of aortic dissection. SYNOPSIS: We compare 2 techniques to realize robotic assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy combined with pelvic procedure. Double docking seems to improve histological results compared to single docking.},
	number = {2},
	journal = {Int J Gynecol Cancer},
	author = {Franke, O. and Narducci, F. and Chereau-Ewald, E. and Orsoni, M. and Jauffret, C. and Leblanc, E. and Houvenaeghel, G. and Lambaudie, E.},
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {*Laparoscopy/adverse effects/instrumentation/methods, *Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects/instrumentation/methods, *Patient Positioning/instrumentation/methods, Adult, Aged, Aorta, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Length of Stay/statistics \& numerical data, Lymph Nodes/pathology/surgery, Middle Aged, Operative Time, Pelvis/*surgery, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects/*instrumentation/methods, Surgical Instruments, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology/pathology/*surgery},
	pages = {331--6},
}
Downloads: 0
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021