A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding. Frew, A. & Johnson, S. N. Invertebrate ecology in Australasian grasslands., Proceedings of the Ninth ACGIE, 2016.
![A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding [pdf]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/pdf.svg "pdf")
Paper abstract bibtex
Paper abstract bibtex Soil nutrients and quality are important factors, not only for plant growth but also for belowground herbivore performance (Barnett and Johnson, 2013; Erb and Lu, 2013), and can be a driving factor for grassland communities (Russell, 1973). Indeed, for many managed grassland and grass crop systems, the application of nutrient fertilisers is common practice to ensure maximum growth and yield. However, fertilisers are often applied without any characterisation of base soil nutrient concentrations or availability. Therefore, fertiliser application could often be unnecessary and can potentially be both economically and ecologically damaging (Stevens et al., 2004; Tilman, 1999).
@article{frew_comparison_2016,
title = {A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding},
shorttitle = {A {Comparison} of {Canefield} {Soil} {Tyoes} on {Root} {Herbivore} {Performance} and {Feeding}},
url = {https://scholar.archive.org/work/fhtyytcokbfm3pikysaxtsiuf4/access/wayback/https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pfigshare-u-files/8259296/Frew_Johnson_2017_188190.pdf},
abstract = {Soil nutrients and quality are important factors, not only for plant growth but also for belowground herbivore performance (Barnett and Johnson, 2013; Erb and Lu, 2013), and can be a driving factor for grassland communities (Russell, 1973). Indeed, for many managed grassland and grass crop systems, the application of nutrient fertilisers is common practice to ensure maximum growth and yield. However, fertilisers are often applied without any characterisation of base soil nutrient concentrations or availability. Therefore, fertiliser application could often be unnecessary and can potentially be both economically and ecologically damaging (Stevens et al., 2004; Tilman, 1999).},
journal = {Invertebrate ecology in Australasian grasslands.},
publisher = {Proceedings of the Ninth ACGIE},
author = {Frew, Adam and Johnson, Scott N.},
year = {2016},
pages = {188--190},
}Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Jb4SBHMbCJhThHgN6","bibbaseid":"frew-johnson-acomparisonofcanefieldsoiltypesonrootherbivoreperformanceandfeeding-2016","author_short":["Frew, A.","Johnson, S. N."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding","shorttitle":"A Comparison of Canefield Soil Tyoes on Root Herbivore Performance and Feeding","url":"https://scholar.archive.org/work/fhtyytcokbfm3pikysaxtsiuf4/access/wayback/https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pfigshare-u-files/8259296/Frew_Johnson_2017_188190.pdf","abstract":"Soil nutrients and quality are important factors, not only for plant growth but also for belowground herbivore performance (Barnett and Johnson, 2013; Erb and Lu, 2013), and can be a driving factor for grassland communities (Russell, 1973). Indeed, for many managed grassland and grass crop systems, the application of nutrient fertilisers is common practice to ensure maximum growth and yield. However, fertilisers are often applied without any characterisation of base soil nutrient concentrations or availability. Therefore, fertiliser application could often be unnecessary and can potentially be both economically and ecologically damaging (Stevens et al., 2004; Tilman, 1999).","journal":"Invertebrate ecology in Australasian grasslands.","publisher":"Proceedings of the Ninth ACGIE","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Frew"],"firstnames":["Adam"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Johnson"],"firstnames":["Scott","N."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2016","pages":"188–190","bibtex":"@article{frew_comparison_2016,\n\ttitle = {A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding},\n\tshorttitle = {A {Comparison} of {Canefield} {Soil} {Tyoes} on {Root} {Herbivore} {Performance} and {Feeding}},\n\turl = {https://scholar.archive.org/work/fhtyytcokbfm3pikysaxtsiuf4/access/wayback/https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pfigshare-u-files/8259296/Frew_Johnson_2017_188190.pdf},\n\tabstract = {Soil nutrients and quality are important factors, not only for plant growth but also for belowground herbivore performance (Barnett and Johnson, 2013; Erb and Lu, 2013), and can be a driving factor for grassland communities (Russell, 1973). Indeed, for many managed grassland and grass crop systems, the application of nutrient fertilisers is common practice to ensure maximum growth and yield. However, fertilisers are often applied without any characterisation of base soil nutrient concentrations or availability. Therefore, fertiliser application could often be unnecessary and can potentially be both economically and ecologically damaging (Stevens et al., 2004; Tilman, 1999).},\n\tjournal = {Invertebrate ecology in Australasian grasslands.},\n\tpublisher = {Proceedings of the Ninth ACGIE},\n\tauthor = {Frew, Adam and Johnson, Scott N.},\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpages = {188--190},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Frew, A.","Johnson, S. N."],"key":"frew_comparison_2016","id":"frew_comparison_2016","bibbaseid":"frew-johnson-acomparisonofcanefieldsoiltypesonrootherbivoreperformanceandfeeding-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://scholar.archive.org/work/fhtyytcokbfm3pikysaxtsiuf4/access/wayback/https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/pfigshare-u-files/8259296/Frew_Johnson_2017_188190.pdf"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/upscpub","dataSources":["9cGcv2t8pRzC92kzs"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["comparison","canefield","soil","types","root","herbivore","performance","feeding","frew","johnson"],"title":"A comparison of canefield soil types on root herbivore performance and feeding","year":2016}