Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints. Friedkin, N. E., Proskurnikov, A. V., Tempo, R., & Parsegov, S. E. Science, 354(6310):321–326, October, 2016. 00002 ![Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex People tend to structure their beliefs in a way that appears consistent to them. But how do some beliefs within groups persist in the face of social pressure, whereas others change and, by changing, influence a cascade of other beliefs? Friedkin et al. developed a model that can describe complexes of attitudes in a group that interact and change (see the Perspective by Butts). Their model revealed how the changing views of the U.S. population on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq changed their views on whether the invasion by the United States was justified. Science , this issue p. [321][1]; see also p. [286][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aag2624 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaj1817
@article{friedkin_network_2016,
title = {Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints},
volume = {354},
copyright = {Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science},
issn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},
url = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6310/321},
doi = {10.1126/science.aag2624},
abstract = {People tend to structure their beliefs in a way that appears consistent to them. But how do some beliefs within groups persist in the face of social pressure, whereas others change and, by changing, influence a cascade of other beliefs? Friedkin et al. developed a model that can describe complexes of attitudes in a group that interact and change (see the Perspective by Butts). Their model revealed how the changing views of the U.S. population on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq changed their views on whether the invasion by the United States was justified.
Science , this issue p. [321][1]; see also p. [286][2]
[1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aag2624
[2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaj1817},
language = {en},
number = {6310},
urldate = {2016-12-17},
journal = {Science},
author = {Friedkin, Noah E. and Proskurnikov, Anton V. and Tempo, Roberto and Parsegov, Sergey E.},
month = oct,
year = {2016},
pmid = {27846564},
note = {00002 },
keywords = {collapse, sociology, beliefs},
pages = {321--326},
file = {Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:C\:\\Users\\rsrs\\Documents\\Zotero Database\\storage\\TTFKDGVA\\Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:application/pdf}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"5Ba6hh9hAstM9Z2yz","bibbaseid":"friedkin-proskurnikov-tempo-parsegov-networkscienceonbeliefsystemdynamicsunderlogicconstraints-2016","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Friedkin, N. E.","Proskurnikov, A. V.","Tempo, R.","Parsegov, S. E."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints","volume":"354","copyright":"Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science","issn":"0036-8075, 1095-9203","url":"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6310/321","doi":"10.1126/science.aag2624","abstract":"People tend to structure their beliefs in a way that appears consistent to them. But how do some beliefs within groups persist in the face of social pressure, whereas others change and, by changing, influence a cascade of other beliefs? Friedkin et al. developed a model that can describe complexes of attitudes in a group that interact and change (see the Perspective by Butts). Their model revealed how the changing views of the U.S. population on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq changed their views on whether the invasion by the United States was justified. Science , this issue p. [321][1]; see also p. [286][2] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aag2624 [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaj1817","language":"en","number":"6310","urldate":"2016-12-17","journal":"Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Friedkin"],"firstnames":["Noah","E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Proskurnikov"],"firstnames":["Anton","V."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tempo"],"firstnames":["Roberto"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Parsegov"],"firstnames":["Sergey","E."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2016","pmid":"27846564","note":"00002 ","keywords":"collapse, sociology, beliefs","pages":"321–326","file":"Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:C\\:\\\\Users\\s̊rs\\\\Documents\\\\Zotero Database\\\\storage\\\\TTFKDGVA\\\\Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{friedkin_network_2016,\n\ttitle = {Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints},\n\tvolume = {354},\n\tcopyright = {Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science},\n\tissn = {0036-8075, 1095-9203},\n\turl = {http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6310/321},\n\tdoi = {10.1126/science.aag2624},\n\tabstract = {People tend to structure their beliefs in a way that appears consistent to them. But how do some beliefs within groups persist in the face of social pressure, whereas others change and, by changing, influence a cascade of other beliefs? Friedkin et al. developed a model that can describe complexes of attitudes in a group that interact and change (see the Perspective by Butts). Their model revealed how the changing views of the U.S. population on the existence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq changed their views on whether the invasion by the United States was justified.\n\nScience , this issue p. [321][1]; see also p. [286][2]\n\n [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aag2624\n [2]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.aaj1817},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {6310},\n\turldate = {2016-12-17},\n\tjournal = {Science},\n\tauthor = {Friedkin, Noah E. and Proskurnikov, Anton V. and Tempo, Roberto and Parsegov, Sergey E.},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpmid = {27846564},\n\tnote = {00002 },\n\tkeywords = {collapse, sociology, beliefs},\n\tpages = {321--326},\n\tfile = {Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:C\\:\\\\Users\\\\rsrs\\\\Documents\\\\Zotero Database\\\\storage\\\\TTFKDGVA\\\\Friedkin et al. - 2016 - Network science on belief system dynamics under lo.pdf:application/pdf}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Friedkin, N. E.","Proskurnikov, A. V.","Tempo, R.","Parsegov, S. E."],"key":"friedkin_network_2016","id":"friedkin_network_2016","bibbaseid":"friedkin-proskurnikov-tempo-parsegov-networkscienceonbeliefsystemdynamicsunderlogicconstraints-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6310/321"},"keyword":["collapse","sociology","beliefs"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.collapsologie.fr/bib.bib","creationDate":"2019-06-13T15:56:08.147Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["collapse","sociology","beliefs"],"search_terms":["network","science","belief","system","dynamics","under","logic","constraints","friedkin","proskurnikov","tempo","parsegov"],"title":"Network science on belief system dynamics under logic constraints","year":2016,"dataSources":["97shAbFSxL7A7SHoh"]}