Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23. Gal, M., Cooper, A., Joseph-Williams, N., Doe, E., Lewis, R., Law, R. J., Anstey, S., Davies, N., Walters, A., Orford, R., Collins, B., Trigg, L., Roberts, C., Meredith, S., Macey, S., Carson-Stevens, A., Greenwell, J., Coomber, F., & Edwards, A. PLOS ONE, 19(11):e0314461, November, 2024. Publisher: Public Library of Science![Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23 [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Background The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021–23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders’ needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC’s rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this ‘pathway to impact’ work will take further time and resources. Discussion and conclusion The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.
@article{gal_knowledge_2024,
title = {Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: {Appraisal} of the {Wales} {COVID}-19 {Evidence} {Centre} processes and impact, 2021–23},
volume = {19},
issn = {1932-6203},
shorttitle = {Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency},
url = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314461},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0314461},
abstract = {Background The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021–23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders’ needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC’s rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this ‘pathway to impact’ work will take further time and resources. Discussion and conclusion The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.},
language = {en},
number = {11},
urldate = {2024-12-10},
journal = {PLOS ONE},
author = {Gal, Micaela and Cooper, Alison and Joseph-Williams, Natalie and Doe, Elizabeth and Lewis, Ruth and Law, Rebecca Jane and Anstey, Sally and Davies, Nathan and Walters, Amy and Orford, Robert and Collins, Brendan and Trigg, Lisa and Roberts, Chris and Meredith, Sarah and Macey, Steven and Carson-Stevens, Andrew and Greenwell, Jane and Coomber, Ffion and Edwards, Adrian},
month = nov,
year = {2024},
note = {Publisher: Public Library of Science},
keywords = {Libre accès},
pages = {e0314461},
file = {Full Text PDF:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/4MZV3VBE/Gal et al. - 2024 - Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews t.pdf:application/pdf},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"8Ewq4qEXYFcpcvDhS","bibbaseid":"gal-cooper-josephwilliams-doe-lewis-law-anstey-davies-etal-knowledgemobilisationofrapidevidencereviewstoinformhealthandsocialcarepolicyandpracticeinapublichealthemergencyappraisalofthewalescovid19evidencecentreprocessesandimpact202123-2024","author_short":["Gal, M.","Cooper, A.","Joseph-Williams, N.","Doe, E.","Lewis, R.","Law, R. J.","Anstey, S.","Davies, N.","Walters, A.","Orford, R.","Collins, B.","Trigg, L.","Roberts, C.","Meredith, S.","Macey, S.","Carson-Stevens, A.","Greenwell, J.","Coomber, F.","Edwards, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23","volume":"19","issn":"1932-6203","shorttitle":"Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency","url":"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314461","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0314461","abstract":"Background The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021–23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders’ needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC’s rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this ‘pathway to impact’ work will take further time and resources. Discussion and conclusion The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.","language":"en","number":"11","urldate":"2024-12-10","journal":"PLOS ONE","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gal"],"firstnames":["Micaela"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cooper"],"firstnames":["Alison"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Joseph-Williams"],"firstnames":["Natalie"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Doe"],"firstnames":["Elizabeth"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lewis"],"firstnames":["Ruth"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Law"],"firstnames":["Rebecca","Jane"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Anstey"],"firstnames":["Sally"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Davies"],"firstnames":["Nathan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Walters"],"firstnames":["Amy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Orford"],"firstnames":["Robert"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Collins"],"firstnames":["Brendan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Trigg"],"firstnames":["Lisa"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Roberts"],"firstnames":["Chris"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Meredith"],"firstnames":["Sarah"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Macey"],"firstnames":["Steven"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Carson-Stevens"],"firstnames":["Andrew"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Greenwell"],"firstnames":["Jane"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Coomber"],"firstnames":["Ffion"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Edwards"],"firstnames":["Adrian"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"November","year":"2024","note":"Publisher: Public Library of Science","keywords":"Libre accès","pages":"e0314461","file":"Full Text PDF:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/4MZV3VBE/Gal et al. - 2024 - Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews t.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{gal_knowledge_2024,\n\ttitle = {Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: {Appraisal} of the {Wales} {COVID}-19 {Evidence} {Centre} processes and impact, 2021–23},\n\tvolume = {19},\n\tissn = {1932-6203},\n\tshorttitle = {Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency},\n\turl = {https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314461},\n\tdoi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0314461},\n\tabstract = {Background The Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre (WCEC) was established from 2021–23 to ensure that the latest coronavirus (COVID-19) relevant research evidence was readily available to inform health and social care policy and practice decision-makers. Although decisions need to be evidence-based, ensuring that accessible and relevant research evidence is available to decision-makers is challenging, especially in a rapidly evolving pandemic environment when timeframes for decision-making are days or weeks rather than months or years. We set up knowledge mobilisation processes to bridge the gap between evidence review and informing decisions, making sure that the right information reaches the right people at the right time. Aims and objectives To describe the knowledge mobilisation processes used by the WCEC, evaluate the impact of the WCEC rapid evidence reviews, and share lessons learned. Methods Our knowledge mobilisation methods were flexible and tailored to meet stakeholders’ needs. They included stakeholder co-production in our rapid evidence review processes, stakeholder-informed and participatory knowledge mobilisation, wider dissemination of outputs and associated activities including public engagement, capacity building and sharing of methodologies. Feedback on processes and evidence of impact was collected via stakeholder engagement and a stakeholder survey. Results Findings indicate that knowledge mobilisation processes successfully enabled use of the WCEC’s rapid evidence reviews to inform policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Wales. Realising actual public and patient benefit from this ‘pathway to impact’ work will take further time and resources. Discussion and conclusion The WCEC knowledge mobilisation processes successfully supported co-production and use of rapid evidence review findings by scientific advisors and policy and practice decision-makers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified barriers and facilitators are of potential relevance to wider evidence initiatives, for setting up similar Centres during crisis situations, and supporting future evidence-based policy and practice decision-making.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {11},\n\turldate = {2024-12-10},\n\tjournal = {PLOS ONE},\n\tauthor = {Gal, Micaela and Cooper, Alison and Joseph-Williams, Natalie and Doe, Elizabeth and Lewis, Ruth and Law, Rebecca Jane and Anstey, Sally and Davies, Nathan and Walters, Amy and Orford, Robert and Collins, Brendan and Trigg, Lisa and Roberts, Chris and Meredith, Sarah and Macey, Steven and Carson-Stevens, Andrew and Greenwell, Jane and Coomber, Ffion and Edwards, Adrian},\n\tmonth = nov,\n\tyear = {2024},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Public Library of Science},\n\tkeywords = {Libre accès},\n\tpages = {e0314461},\n\tfile = {Full Text PDF:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/4MZV3VBE/Gal et al. - 2024 - Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews t.pdf:application/pdf},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Gal, M.","Cooper, A.","Joseph-Williams, N.","Doe, E.","Lewis, R.","Law, R. J.","Anstey, S.","Davies, N.","Walters, A.","Orford, R.","Collins, B.","Trigg, L.","Roberts, C.","Meredith, S.","Macey, S.","Carson-Stevens, A.","Greenwell, J.","Coomber, F.","Edwards, A."],"key":"gal_knowledge_2024","id":"gal_knowledge_2024","bibbaseid":"gal-cooper-josephwilliams-doe-lewis-law-anstey-davies-etal-knowledgemobilisationofrapidevidencereviewstoinformhealthandsocialcarepolicyandpracticeinapublichealthemergencyappraisalofthewalescovid19evidencecentreprocessesandimpact202123-2024","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0314461"},"keyword":["Libre accès"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/RhHgGdk9ExAg6fTih","dataSources":["22xhRBaAk8FJFMrjr","t7SFBfwx8393fHpnb","FoToQXbXMFKNTEghw","Tr3BLTQu5S6pnTW5T","3KxDwB88aZw69z9dH","xwti8cycTYqZgq8hW","DseuH5oGFetS3ecBR","Dj3D8KzYitTzieuH7","5LpFeRqfJZgzSDycz","9JifNBTfxdayvX7zL"],"keywords":["libre accès"],"search_terms":["knowledge","mobilisation","rapid","evidence","reviews","inform","health","social","care","policy","practice","public","health","emergency","appraisal","wales","covid","evidence","centre","processes","impact","2021","gal","cooper","joseph-williams","doe","lewis","law","anstey","davies","walters","orford","collins","trigg","roberts","meredith","macey","carson-stevens","greenwell","coomber","edwards"],"title":"Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: Appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021–23","year":2024}