What is a “history of the present”? On Foucault’s genealogies and their critical preconditions. Garland, D. Punishment & Society, 16(4):365–384, 2014.
doi  abstract   bibtex   
In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.
@article{garland_what_2014,
	title = {What is a “history of the present”? {On} {Foucault}’s genealogies and their critical preconditions},
	volume = {16},
	issn = {1462-4745},
	shorttitle = {What is a “history of the present”?},
	doi = {10.1177/1462474514541711},
	abstract = {In this article Michel Foucault’s method of writing a “history of the present” is explained, together with its critical objectives and its difference from conventional historiography. Foucault’s shift from a style of historical research and analysis conceived as “archaeology” to one understood as “genealogy” is also discussed, showing how the history of the present deploys genealogical inquiry and the uncovering of hidden conflicts and contexts as a means of re-valuing the value of contemporary phenomena. The article highlights the critical observations of present-day phenomena from which a history of the present begins, paying particular attention to Foucault’s concept of “dispositif” and his method of problematization. Foucault’s analyses of Bentham’s Panopticon, of the disciplinary sources of the modern prison, and of the technology of confession are discussed by way of illustration.},
	language = {en},
	number = {4},
	journal = {Punishment \& Society},
	author = {Garland, David},
	year = {2014},
	pages = {365--384},
}

Downloads: 0