@article{Gauld2024,
abstract = {BACKGROUND: Catatonia, as a transdiagnostic construct, manifests across various  psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Understanding how symptom variations impact the catatonia construct and differ across primary diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, unipolar depression, and neurological/metabolic/immunological condition) is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study aims to compare the symptom networks and centrality measures of these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a network analysis using Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) data from 118 patients, examining centrality measures and network comparisons across the four primary diagnostic groups. RESULTS: In the general catatonia network, the three most central symptoms identified were Excitement (1.462), Perseveration (1.456), and Impulsivity (1.332). While the overall structure of the catatonia networks did not show significant differences between diagnoses in terms of symptom connections and centrality, variations in centrality measures were observed among the different networks. CONCLUSIONS: The study reinforces the notion of catatonia as an independent syndrome relatively to psychiatric or non-psychiatric diagnoses. However, the variation in centrality of symptoms across different primary diagnoses provides critical insights that could aid clinicians in tailoring diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future research should further explore these relationships and develop more refined approaches to managing catatonia.},
author = {Gauld, Christophe and Expert, Paul and Fovet, Thomas and Amad, Ali},
doi = {10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111082},
issn = {1878-4216 (Electronic)},
journal = {Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry},
keywords = {Adult,Bipolar Disorder,Catatonia,Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales,Schizophrenia,Young Adult,complications,diagnosis},
language = {eng},
month = {aug},
pages = {111082},
pmid = {39002926},
title = {{A network analysis of catatonia symptoms across diagnoses.}},
volume = {134},
year = {2024}
}

{"_id":"dZoYCJ5wCfQK8cfB6","bibbaseid":"gauld-expert-fovet-amad-anetworkanalysisofcatatoniasymptomsacrossdiagnoses-2024","author_short":["Gauld, C.","Expert, P.","Fovet, T.","Amad, A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"BACKGROUND: Catatonia, as a transdiagnostic construct, manifests across various psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Understanding how symptom variations impact the catatonia construct and differ across primary diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, unipolar depression, and neurological/metabolic/immunological condition) is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study aims to compare the symptom networks and centrality measures of these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a network analysis using Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) data from 118 patients, examining centrality measures and network comparisons across the four primary diagnostic groups. RESULTS: In the general catatonia network, the three most central symptoms identified were Excitement (1.462), Perseveration (1.456), and Impulsivity (1.332). While the overall structure of the catatonia networks did not show significant differences between diagnoses in terms of symptom connections and centrality, variations in centrality measures were observed among the different networks. CONCLUSIONS: The study reinforces the notion of catatonia as an independent syndrome relatively to psychiatric or non-psychiatric diagnoses. However, the variation in centrality of symptoms across different primary diagnoses provides critical insights that could aid clinicians in tailoring diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future research should further explore these relationships and develop more refined approaches to managing catatonia.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gauld"],"firstnames":["Christophe"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Expert"],"firstnames":["Paul"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fovet"],"firstnames":["Thomas"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Amad"],"firstnames":["Ali"],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111082","issn":"1878-4216 (Electronic)","journal":"Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry","keywords":"Adult,Bipolar Disorder,Catatonia,Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales,Schizophrenia,Young Adult,complications,diagnosis","language":"eng","month":"aug","pages":"111082","pmid":"39002926","title":"A network analysis of catatonia symptoms across diagnoses.","volume":"134","year":"2024","bibtex":"@article{Gauld2024,\nabstract = {BACKGROUND: Catatonia, as a transdiagnostic construct, manifests across various psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions. Understanding how symptom variations impact the catatonia construct and differ across primary diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, unipolar depression, and neurological/metabolic/immunological condition) is essential to refine diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. This study aims to compare the symptom networks and centrality measures of these diagnoses. METHODS: We conducted a network analysis using Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS) data from 118 patients, examining centrality measures and network comparisons across the four primary diagnostic groups. RESULTS: In the general catatonia network, the three most central symptoms identified were Excitement (1.462), Perseveration (1.456), and Impulsivity (1.332). While the overall structure of the catatonia networks did not show significant differences between diagnoses in terms of symptom connections and centrality, variations in centrality measures were observed among the different networks. CONCLUSIONS: The study reinforces the notion of catatonia as an independent syndrome relatively to psychiatric or non-psychiatric diagnoses. However, the variation in centrality of symptoms across different primary diagnoses provides critical insights that could aid clinicians in tailoring diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. Future research should further explore these relationships and develop more refined approaches to managing catatonia.},\nauthor = {Gauld, Christophe and Expert, Paul and Fovet, Thomas and Amad, Ali},\ndoi = {10.1016/j.pnpbp.2024.111082},\nissn = {1878-4216 (Electronic)},\njournal = {Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry},\nkeywords = {Adult,Bipolar Disorder,Catatonia,Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Psychiatric Status Rating Scales,Schizophrenia,Young Adult,complications,diagnosis},\nlanguage = {eng},\nmonth = {aug},\npages = {111082},\npmid = {39002926},\ntitle = {{A network analysis of catatonia symptoms across diagnoses.}},\nvolume = {134},\nyear = {2024}\n}\n","author_short":["Gauld, C.","Expert, P.","Fovet, T.","Amad, A."],"key":"Gauld2024","id":"Gauld2024","bibbaseid":"gauld-expert-fovet-amad-anetworkanalysisofcatatoniasymptomsacrossdiagnoses-2024","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adult","Bipolar Disorder","Catatonia","Female","Humans","Male","Middle Aged","Psychiatric Status Rating Scales","Schizophrenia","Young Adult","complications","diagnosis"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://nextcloud.univ-lille.fr/index.php/s/ZN4QZ7dH9iNaNWE/download/Interactions.bib","dataSources":["aoviYY6aq9rCo9DnF","ECsXQHgbAjNJDKiJ7","GsDYmPYw6fNzpugKw"],"keywords":["adult","bipolar disorder","catatonia","female","humans","male","middle aged","psychiatric status rating scales","schizophrenia","young adult","complications","diagnosis"],"search_terms":["network","analysis","catatonia","symptoms","diagnoses","gauld","expert","fovet","amad"],"title":"A network analysis of catatonia symptoms across diagnoses.","year":2024}