Predoctoral MD-PhD grants as indicators of future NIH funding success. Ghosh-Choudhary, S., Carleton, N., Nouraie, S. M., Kliment, C. R., & Steinman, R. A. JCI insight, 7(6):e155688, March, 2022. doi abstract bibtex MD-PhD trainees constitute an important source of physician-scientists. Persistence on this challenging path is facilitated by success in garnering independent (R grant) support from the NIH. Published research tracks academic appointments and global R01 success for MD-PhD trainees but has not included information on future funding success of individual MD-PhD predoctoral grant holders. Here, we used data from the NIH RePORTER database to identify and track the funding trajectory of physician-scientists who received predoctoral grant support through the F30 mechanism, which is specific for dual-degree candidates. Male and female F30 awardees did not differ in their success in garnering K (postdoctoral training) grants, but, among F30 grant awardees, men were 2.6 times more likely than women to receive R funding. These results underscore the need for analysis of factors that contribute to the disproportionate loss of NIH-supported female physician-scientists between the predoctoral F30 and the independent R grant-supported stages.
@article{ghosh-choudhary2022,
title = {Predoctoral {MD}-{PhD} grants as indicators of future {NIH} funding success},
volume = {7},
issn = {2379-3708},
doi = {10.1172/jci.insight.155688},
abstract = {MD-PhD trainees constitute an important source of physician-scientists. Persistence on this challenging path is facilitated by success in garnering independent (R grant) support from the NIH. Published research tracks academic appointments and global R01 success for MD-PhD trainees but has not included information on future funding success of individual MD-PhD predoctoral grant holders. Here, we used data from the NIH RePORTER database to identify and track the funding trajectory of physician-scientists who received predoctoral grant support through the F30 mechanism, which is specific for dual-degree candidates. Male and female F30 awardees did not differ in their success in garnering K (postdoctoral training) grants, but, among F30 grant awardees, men were 2.6 times more likely than women to receive R funding. These results underscore the need for analysis of factors that contribute to the disproportionate loss of NIH-supported female physician-scientists between the predoctoral F30 and the independent R grant-supported stages.},
language = {eng},
number = {6},
journal = {JCI insight},
author = {Ghosh-Choudhary, Shohini and Carleton, Neil and Nouraie, S. Mehdi and Kliment, Corrine R. and Steinman, Richard A.},
month = mar,
year = {2022},
pmid = {35315356},
pmcid = {PMC8986062},
keywords = {Humans, Databases, Factual, Male, Female, Aging, Behavior, Biomedical Research, Physicians},
pages = {e155688},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"y3ndYG6okzwcSpPG4","bibbaseid":"ghoshchoudhary-carleton-nouraie-kliment-steinman-predoctoralmdphdgrantsasindicatorsoffuturenihfundingsuccess-2022","author_short":["Ghosh-Choudhary, S.","Carleton, N.","Nouraie, S. M.","Kliment, C. R.","Steinman, R. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Predoctoral MD-PhD grants as indicators of future NIH funding success","volume":"7","issn":"2379-3708","doi":"10.1172/jci.insight.155688","abstract":"MD-PhD trainees constitute an important source of physician-scientists. Persistence on this challenging path is facilitated by success in garnering independent (R grant) support from the NIH. Published research tracks academic appointments and global R01 success for MD-PhD trainees but has not included information on future funding success of individual MD-PhD predoctoral grant holders. Here, we used data from the NIH RePORTER database to identify and track the funding trajectory of physician-scientists who received predoctoral grant support through the F30 mechanism, which is specific for dual-degree candidates. Male and female F30 awardees did not differ in their success in garnering K (postdoctoral training) grants, but, among F30 grant awardees, men were 2.6 times more likely than women to receive R funding. These results underscore the need for analysis of factors that contribute to the disproportionate loss of NIH-supported female physician-scientists between the predoctoral F30 and the independent R grant-supported stages.","language":"eng","number":"6","journal":"JCI insight","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ghosh-Choudhary"],"firstnames":["Shohini"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Carleton"],"firstnames":["Neil"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nouraie"],"firstnames":["S.","Mehdi"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kliment"],"firstnames":["Corrine","R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Steinman"],"firstnames":["Richard","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2022","pmid":"35315356","pmcid":"PMC8986062","keywords":"Humans, Databases, Factual, Male, Female, Aging, Behavior, Biomedical Research, Physicians","pages":"e155688","bibtex":"@article{ghosh-choudhary2022,\n\ttitle = {Predoctoral {MD}-{PhD} grants as indicators of future {NIH} funding success},\n\tvolume = {7},\n\tissn = {2379-3708},\n\tdoi = {10.1172/jci.insight.155688},\n\tabstract = {MD-PhD trainees constitute an important source of physician-scientists. Persistence on this challenging path is facilitated by success in garnering independent (R grant) support from the NIH. Published research tracks academic appointments and global R01 success for MD-PhD trainees but has not included information on future funding success of individual MD-PhD predoctoral grant holders. Here, we used data from the NIH RePORTER database to identify and track the funding trajectory of physician-scientists who received predoctoral grant support through the F30 mechanism, which is specific for dual-degree candidates. Male and female F30 awardees did not differ in their success in garnering K (postdoctoral training) grants, but, among F30 grant awardees, men were 2.6 times more likely than women to receive R funding. These results underscore the need for analysis of factors that contribute to the disproportionate loss of NIH-supported female physician-scientists between the predoctoral F30 and the independent R grant-supported stages.},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\tjournal = {JCI insight},\n\tauthor = {Ghosh-Choudhary, Shohini and Carleton, Neil and Nouraie, S. Mehdi and Kliment, Corrine R. and Steinman, Richard A.},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2022},\n\tpmid = {35315356},\n\tpmcid = {PMC8986062},\n\tkeywords = {Humans, Databases, Factual, Male, Female, Aging, Behavior, Biomedical Research, Physicians},\n\tpages = {e155688},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ghosh-Choudhary, S.","Carleton, N.","Nouraie, S. M.","Kliment, C. R.","Steinman, R. A."],"bibbaseid":"ghoshchoudhary-carleton-nouraie-kliment-steinman-predoctoralmdphdgrantsasindicatorsoffuturenihfundingsuccess-2022","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Humans","Databases","Factual","Male","Female","Aging","Behavior","Biomedical Research","Physicians"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/8yBxW5neHauDryu9w/LCNeuro Site.bib","dataSources":["ZHHpjMFTPYP8NqJif"],"keywords":["humans","databases","factual","male","female","aging","behavior","biomedical research","physicians"],"search_terms":["predoctoral","phd","grants","indicators","future","nih","funding","success","ghosh-choudhary","carleton","nouraie","kliment","steinman"],"title":"Predoctoral MD-PhD grants as indicators of future NIH funding success","year":2022}