Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384. Giroux, M. Frontières, 24(1-2):18–30, 2011. Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal
Paper doi abstract bibtex The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.
@article{giroux_les_2011,
title = {Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la {Commission} de {Réforme} du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi {C}-384},
volume = {24},
issn = {1180-3479, 1916-0976},
url = {http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fr/2011-v24-n1-2-fr0357/1013081ar/},
doi = {https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.7202/1013081ar},
abstract = {The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.},
language = {fr},
number = {1-2},
urldate = {2020-04-18},
journal = {Frontières},
author = {Giroux, Michel},
year = {2011},
note = {Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal},
keywords = {Commission de réforme du droit du Canada, Law Reform Commission of Canada, aide au suicide, aiding suicide, bill C-384, cessation of treatment, discussion publique, droit de mourir dans la dignité, euthanasia, euthanasie, interruption de traitement, projet de loi C-384, public discussion, right to die with dignity},
pages = {18--30},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"Pmfhdk3bdXuwt737M","bibbaseid":"giroux-lespralablesundbatsenssurleuthanasieetlapertinencedudocumentdelacommissionderformedudroitsurleuthanasieconsidrantleprojetdeloic384-2011","author_short":["Giroux, M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384","volume":"24","issn":"1180-3479, 1916-0976","url":"http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fr/2011-v24-n1-2-fr0357/1013081ar/","doi":"https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.7202/1013081ar","abstract":"The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.","language":"fr","number":"1-2","urldate":"2020-04-18","journal":"Frontières","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Giroux"],"firstnames":["Michel"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2011","note":"Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal","keywords":"Commission de réforme du droit du Canada, Law Reform Commission of Canada, aide au suicide, aiding suicide, bill C-384, cessation of treatment, discussion publique, droit de mourir dans la dignité, euthanasia, euthanasie, interruption de traitement, projet de loi C-384, public discussion, right to die with dignity","pages":"18–30","bibtex":"@article{giroux_les_2011,\n\ttitle = {Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la {Commission} de {Réforme} du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi {C}-384},\n\tvolume = {24},\n\tissn = {1180-3479, 1916-0976},\n\turl = {http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fr/2011-v24-n1-2-fr0357/1013081ar/},\n\tdoi = {https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.7202/1013081ar},\n\tabstract = {The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.},\n\tlanguage = {fr},\n\tnumber = {1-2},\n\turldate = {2020-04-18},\n\tjournal = {Frontières},\n\tauthor = {Giroux, Michel},\n\tyear = {2011},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal},\n\tkeywords = {Commission de réforme du droit du Canada, Law Reform Commission of Canada, aide au suicide, aiding suicide, bill C-384, cessation of treatment, discussion publique, droit de mourir dans la dignité, euthanasia, euthanasie, interruption de traitement, projet de loi C-384, public discussion, right to die with dignity},\n\tpages = {18--30},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Giroux, M."],"key":"giroux_les_2011","id":"giroux_les_2011","bibbaseid":"giroux-lespralablesundbatsenssurleuthanasieetlapertinencedudocumentdelacommissionderformedudroitsurleuthanasieconsidrantleprojetdeloic384-2011","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fr/2011-v24-n1-2-fr0357/1013081ar/"},"keyword":["Commission de réforme du droit du Canada","Law Reform Commission of Canada","aide au suicide","aiding suicide","bill C-384","cessation of treatment","discussion publique","droit de mourir dans la dignité","euthanasia","euthanasie","interruption de traitement","projet de loi C-384","public discussion","right to die with dignity"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/albeo1","dataSources":["7YGNF4MLRQi3TLvha"],"keywords":["commission de réforme du droit du canada","law reform commission of canada","aide au suicide","aiding suicide","bill c-384","cessation of treatment","discussion publique","droit de mourir dans la dignité","euthanasia","euthanasie","interruption de traitement","projet de loi c-384","public discussion","right to die with dignity"],"search_terms":["les","alables","bat","sens","sur","euthanasie","pertinence","document","commission","forme","droit","sur","euthanasie","consid","rant","projet","loi","384","giroux"],"title":"Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384","year":2011}