Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384. Giroux, M. Frontières, 24(1-2):18–30, 2011. Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal
Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la Commission de Réforme du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi C-384 [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.
@article{giroux_les_2011,
	title = {Les préalables à un débat sensé sur l’euthanasie, et la pertinence du document de la {Commission} de {Réforme} du droit sur l’euthanasie, considérant le projet de loi {C}-384},
	volume = {24},
	issn = {1180-3479, 1916-0976},
	url = {http://www.erudit.org/en/journals/fr/2011-v24-n1-2-fr0357/1013081ar/},
	doi = {https://doi-org.acces.bibl.ulaval.ca/10.7202/1013081ar},
	abstract = {The Law Reform Commission of Canada (LRC) published, in 1982, a working paper, Euthanasia, Aiding Suicide and Cessation of Treatment. In 2009, MP Francine Lalonde proposed to the House of Commons bill C-384, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (right to die with dignity). This bill was undone. A period of about thirty years separates these two documents. What are the concerns which share these documents ? Does the bill understand assisted suicide in a way which differs from that of the LRC document ? The examination of the LRC document, bill C-384 and the works of the House of Commons highlights persistent difficulties in our public discussions. Some suggestions need to be done about the desirable debate on a subject as contentious as euthanasia and aiding suicide.},
	language = {fr},
	number = {1-2},
	urldate = {2020-04-18},
	journal = {Frontières},
	author = {Giroux, Michel},
	year = {2011},
	note = {Publisher: Université du Québec à Montréal},
	keywords = {Commission de réforme du droit du Canada, Law Reform Commission of Canada, aide au suicide, aiding suicide, bill C-384, cessation of treatment, discussion publique, droit de mourir dans la dignité, euthanasia, euthanasie, interruption de traitement, projet de loi C-384, public discussion, right to die with dignity},
	pages = {18--30},
}

Downloads: 0