Coarctation of the aorta: comparison of aortic dimensions between conventional MR imaging, 3D MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Godart F, Labrot G, Devos P, McFadden E, Rey C, & Beregi JP Eur. Radiol., 12:2034-2039, 2002.
Coarctation of the aorta: comparison of aortic dimensions between conventional MR imaging, 3D MR angiography, and conventional angiography [link]Paper  doi  bibtex   
@article{godart_f_COARCTATION_2002,
title = {Coarctation of the aorta: comparison of aortic dimensions between conventional MR imaging, 3D MR angiography, and conventional angiography},
volume = {12},
issn = {0938-7994},
url = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12136322},
DOI = {10.1007/s00330-001-1260-7},
Language = {English},
Journal = {Eur. Radiol.},
author = {{Godart F} and {Labrot G} and {Devos P} and {McFadden E} and {Rey C} and {Beregi JP}},
year = {2002},
keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Angiography, Aortic Coarctation/diagnosis*, Aortic Coarctation/diagnostic imaging, Child, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Magnetic Resonance Angiography/methods*, Male, Observer Variation},
pages = {2034-2039}
}

Downloads: 0