@article{
 title = {Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives},
 type = {article},
 year = {2014},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 keywords = {coaching,collaboratives,facilitation,health care quality improvement,interprofessional teams,leadership},
 pages = {452-464},
 volume = {22},
 month = {5},
 publisher = {John Wiley & Sons Ltd},
 city = {Student, School of Health Sciences, and Jonkoping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden; The Dartmouth Institute Microsystem Academy, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel },
 id = {8fda9150-3391-318a-ae74-f0a32417d003},
 created = {2016-08-21T22:18:48.000Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},
 group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},
 last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 source_type = {JOUR},
 notes = {ID: 69645; CI: (c) 2013; JID: 9306050; OTO: NOTNLM; 2013/01/18 [accepted]; 2013/06/20 [aheadofprint]; ppublish},
 folder_uuids = {435e3c6f-101d-4683-8abf-a8a97b774f2a},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {AIM: To investigate health care improvement team coaching activities from the perspectives of coachees, coaches and unit leaders in two national improvement collaboratives. BACKGROUND: Despite numerous methods to improve health care, inconsistencies in success have been attributed to factors that include unengaged staff, absence of supportive improvement resources and organisational inertia. METHODS: Mixed methods sequential exploratory study design, including quantitative and qualitative data from interprofessional improvement teams who received team coaching. The coachees (n = 382), coaches (n = 9) and leaders (n = 30) completed three different data collection tools identifying coaching actions perceived to support improvement activities. RESULTS: Coachees, coaches and unit leaders in both collaboratives reported generally positive perceptions about team coaching. Four categories of coaching actions were perceived to support improvement work: context, relationships, helping and technical support. CONCLUSIONS: All participants agreed that regardless of who the coach is, emphasis should include the four categories of team coaching actions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Leaders should reflect on their efforts to support improvement teams and consider the four categories of team coaching actions. A structured team coaching model that offers needed encouragement to keep the team energized, seems to support health care improvement.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Godfrey, M M and Andersson-Gare, B and Nelson, E C and Nilsson, M and Ahlstrom, G},
 journal = {Journal of nursing management},
 number = {4}
}

{"_id":"daYHmYciF38uJ2mX2","bibbaseid":"godfrey-anderssongare-nelson-nilsson-ahlstrom-coachinginterprofessionalhealthcareimprovementteamsthecoacheethecoachandtheleaderperspectives-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-23T19:05:20.823Z","title":"Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives","author_short":["Godfrey, M., M.","Andersson-Gare, B.","Nelson, E., C.","Nilsson, M.","Ahlstrom, G."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives","type":"article","year":"2014","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"coaching,collaboratives,facilitation,health care quality improvement,interprofessional teams,leadership","pages":"452-464","volume":"22","month":"5","publisher":"John Wiley & Sons Ltd","city":"Student, School of Health Sciences, and Jonkoping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden; The Dartmouth Institute Microsystem Academy, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel ","id":"8fda9150-3391-318a-ae74-f0a32417d003","created":"2016-08-21T22:18:48.000Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597","group_id":"408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4","last_modified":"2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","notes":"ID: 69645; CI: (c) 2013; JID: 9306050; OTO: NOTNLM; 2013/01/18 [accepted]; 2013/06/20 [aheadofprint]; ppublish","folder_uuids":"435e3c6f-101d-4683-8abf-a8a97b774f2a","private_publication":false,"abstract":"AIM: To investigate health care improvement team coaching activities from the perspectives of coachees, coaches and unit leaders in two national improvement collaboratives. BACKGROUND: Despite numerous methods to improve health care, inconsistencies in success have been attributed to factors that include unengaged staff, absence of supportive improvement resources and organisational inertia. METHODS: Mixed methods sequential exploratory study design, including quantitative and qualitative data from interprofessional improvement teams who received team coaching. The coachees (n = 382), coaches (n = 9) and leaders (n = 30) completed three different data collection tools identifying coaching actions perceived to support improvement activities. RESULTS: Coachees, coaches and unit leaders in both collaboratives reported generally positive perceptions about team coaching. Four categories of coaching actions were perceived to support improvement work: context, relationships, helping and technical support. CONCLUSIONS: All participants agreed that regardless of who the coach is, emphasis should include the four categories of team coaching actions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Leaders should reflect on their efforts to support improvement teams and consider the four categories of team coaching actions. A structured team coaching model that offers needed encouragement to keep the team energized, seems to support health care improvement.","bibtype":"article","author":"Godfrey, M M and Andersson-Gare, B and Nelson, E C and Nilsson, M and Ahlstrom, G","journal":"Journal of nursing management","number":"4","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Coaching interprofessional health care improvement teams: the coachee, the coach and the leader perspectives},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {coaching,collaboratives,facilitation,health care quality improvement,interprofessional teams,leadership},\n pages = {452-464},\n volume = {22},\n month = {5},\n publisher = {John Wiley & Sons Ltd},\n city = {Student, School of Health Sciences, and Jonkoping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jonkoping University, Jonkoping, Sweden; The Dartmouth Institute Microsystem Academy, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel },\n id = {8fda9150-3391-318a-ae74-f0a32417d003},\n created = {2016-08-21T22:18:48.000Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {217ced55-4c79-38dc-838b-4b5ea8df5597},\n group_id = {408d37d9-5f1b-3398-a9f5-5c1a487116d4},\n last_modified = {2017-03-14T09:54:45.334Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n notes = {ID: 69645; CI: (c) 2013; JID: 9306050; OTO: NOTNLM; 2013/01/18 [accepted]; 2013/06/20 [aheadofprint]; ppublish},\n folder_uuids = {435e3c6f-101d-4683-8abf-a8a97b774f2a},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {AIM: To investigate health care improvement team coaching activities from the perspectives of coachees, coaches and unit leaders in two national improvement collaboratives. BACKGROUND: Despite numerous methods to improve health care, inconsistencies in success have been attributed to factors that include unengaged staff, absence of supportive improvement resources and organisational inertia. METHODS: Mixed methods sequential exploratory study design, including quantitative and qualitative data from interprofessional improvement teams who received team coaching. The coachees (n = 382), coaches (n = 9) and leaders (n = 30) completed three different data collection tools identifying coaching actions perceived to support improvement activities. RESULTS: Coachees, coaches and unit leaders in both collaboratives reported generally positive perceptions about team coaching. Four categories of coaching actions were perceived to support improvement work: context, relationships, helping and technical support. CONCLUSIONS: All participants agreed that regardless of who the coach is, emphasis should include the four categories of team coaching actions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Leaders should reflect on their efforts to support improvement teams and consider the four categories of team coaching actions. A structured team coaching model that offers needed encouragement to keep the team energized, seems to support health care improvement.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Godfrey, M M and Andersson-Gare, B and Nelson, E C and Nilsson, M and Ahlstrom, G},\n journal = {Journal of nursing management},\n number = {4}\n}","author_short":["Godfrey, M., M.","Andersson-Gare, B.","Nelson, E., C.","Nilsson, M.","Ahlstrom, G."],"bibbaseid":"godfrey-anderssongare-nelson-nilsson-ahlstrom-coachinginterprofessionalhealthcareimprovementteamsthecoacheethecoachandtheleaderperspectives-2014","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["coaching","collaboratives","facilitation","health care quality improvement","interprofessional teams","leadership"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["coaching","interprofessional","health","care","improvement","teams","coachee","coach","leader","perspectives","godfrey","andersson-gare","nelson","nilsson","ahlstrom"],"keywords":["coaching","collaboratives","facilitation","health care quality improvement","interprofessional teams","leadership"],"authorIDs":[]}