@article{goffman_arrangement_1977-1,
	title = {The arrangement between the sexes},
	volume = {4},
	issn = {0304-2421},
	doi = {10.1007/BF00206983},
	abstract = {The limited range of biological differences between men \& women in industrial societies does not obviously dictate which social roles they can fulfill. An account of these roles as social phenomena is offered. The heart of the situation is the existence of the sex-classes of M \& F, distinguished in ways prescribed by social norms which go beyond biological differences \& may conflict with them. Women as a SC have certain disadvantages \& certain advantages; as a disadvantaged group they are somewhat cut off from one another \& are given some stake in the fortunes of the men to whom they are linked. Unlike other disadvantaged groups, women are held in high regard in some respects; aspects of this include the courtship process \& the extension of courtesy to women. These two aspects are partially linked through the greater readiness of men to show courtesy to young \& attractive women. The family offers a training ground for these roles, typically containing adults \& children of both sexes. Many institutions putatively based on sexual differences are, in fact, means of producing them or of making them significant. This represents institutional reflexivity, the production by institutions of the conditions which justify their existence. These role differences produce distinct differential contingencies of public activity for the two sexes. W. H. Stoddard.},
	number = {3},
	journal = {Theory and Society},
	author = {Goffman, Erving},
	year = {1977},
	pages = {301--331},
}

{"_id":"yJHMh8GRHcy7vrxQv","bibbaseid":"goffman-thearrangementbetweenthesexes-1977","author_short":["Goffman, E."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The arrangement between the sexes","volume":"4","issn":"0304-2421","doi":"10.1007/BF00206983","abstract":"The limited range of biological differences between men & women in industrial societies does not obviously dictate which social roles they can fulfill. An account of these roles as social phenomena is offered. The heart of the situation is the existence of the sex-classes of M & F, distinguished in ways prescribed by social norms which go beyond biological differences & may conflict with them. Women as a SC have certain disadvantages & certain advantages; as a disadvantaged group they are somewhat cut off from one another & are given some stake in the fortunes of the men to whom they are linked. Unlike other disadvantaged groups, women are held in high regard in some respects; aspects of this include the courtship process & the extension of courtesy to women. These two aspects are partially linked through the greater readiness of men to show courtesy to young & attractive women. The family offers a training ground for these roles, typically containing adults & children of both sexes. Many institutions putatively based on sexual differences are, in fact, means of producing them or of making them significant. This represents institutional reflexivity, the production by institutions of the conditions which justify their existence. These role differences produce distinct differential contingencies of public activity for the two sexes. W. H. Stoddard.","number":"3","journal":"Theory and Society","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Goffman"],"firstnames":["Erving"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1977","pages":"301–331","bibtex":"@article{goffman_arrangement_1977-1,\n\ttitle = {The arrangement between the sexes},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tissn = {0304-2421},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/BF00206983},\n\tabstract = {The limited range of biological differences between men \\& women in industrial societies does not obviously dictate which social roles they can fulfill. An account of these roles as social phenomena is offered. The heart of the situation is the existence of the sex-classes of M \\& F, distinguished in ways prescribed by social norms which go beyond biological differences \\& may conflict with them. Women as a SC have certain disadvantages \\& certain advantages; as a disadvantaged group they are somewhat cut off from one another \\& are given some stake in the fortunes of the men to whom they are linked. Unlike other disadvantaged groups, women are held in high regard in some respects; aspects of this include the courtship process \\& the extension of courtesy to women. These two aspects are partially linked through the greater readiness of men to show courtesy to young \\& attractive women. The family offers a training ground for these roles, typically containing adults \\& children of both sexes. Many institutions putatively based on sexual differences are, in fact, means of producing them or of making them significant. This represents institutional reflexivity, the production by institutions of the conditions which justify their existence. These role differences produce distinct differential contingencies of public activity for the two sexes. W. H. Stoddard.},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Theory and Society},\n\tauthor = {Goffman, Erving},\n\tyear = {1977},\n\tpages = {301--331},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Goffman, E."],"key":"goffman_arrangement_1977-1","id":"goffman_arrangement_1977-1","bibbaseid":"goffman-thearrangementbetweenthesexes-1977","role":"author","urls":{},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/mimagree","dataSources":["AXusoRBcQfTAj3g6r"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["arrangement","between","sexes","goffman"],"title":"The arrangement between the sexes","year":1977}