Agreement between assays of cell-mediated immunity utilizing Mycobacterium bovis-specific antigens for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer). Goosen, W. J., Miller, M. A., Chegou, N. N., Cooper, D., Warren, R. M., van Helden, P. D., & Parsons, S. D. C. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 160(1):133–138, July, 2014.
Agreement between assays of cell-mediated immunity utilizing Mycobacterium bovis-specific antigens for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
We assessed the use of Mycobacterium bovis-specific peptides for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) by evaluating the agreement between the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test (SICTT), the Bovigam® EC (BEC) assay, the Bovigam® HP (BHP) assay and two assays utilizing the QuantiFERON® TB-Gold (in tube) system employing 20h (mQFT20 assay) and 30h (mQFT30 assay) whole blood incubation periods. Of 84 buffaloes, 45% were SICTT-positive, 48% were BEC-positive, 50% were BHP-positive, 37% were mQFT20-positive and 43% were mQFT30-positive. Agreement between the BEC and BHP Bovigam® assays was high (κ=0.86, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) and these detected the most test-positive animals suggesting that they were the most sensitive assays. Interferon-gamma release was significantly greater in buffaloes that were test-positive for all tests than in animals with discordant but positive Bovigam® results. Agreement between the mQFT assays was equally high (κ=0.88, 95% CI 0.77–0.98); however, all buffaloes with discordant mQFT results (n=6) were mQFT30-positive/mQFT20-negative, including three confirmed M. bovis-infected animals, suggesting that the mQFT30 assay is the more sensitive of the two. Agreements between the two Bovigam® and two mQFT assays were moderate, suggesting that in its current format the mQFT assay is less sensitive than either the BEC or the BHP assays.
@article{goosen_agreement_2014,
	title = {Agreement between assays of cell-mediated immunity utilizing {Mycobacterium} bovis-specific antigens for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in {African} buffaloes ({Syncerus} caffer)},
	volume = {160},
	issn = {0165-2427},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165242714000816},
	doi = {10.1016/j.vetimm.2014.03.015},
	abstract = {We assessed the use of Mycobacterium bovis-specific peptides for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in African buffaloes (Syncerus caffer) by evaluating the agreement between the single intradermal comparative tuberculin test (SICTT), the Bovigam® EC (BEC) assay, the Bovigam® HP (BHP) assay and two assays utilizing the QuantiFERON® TB-Gold (in tube) system employing 20h (mQFT20 assay) and 30h (mQFT30 assay) whole blood incubation periods. Of 84 buffaloes, 45\% were SICTT-positive, 48\% were BEC-positive, 50\% were BHP-positive, 37\% were mQFT20-positive and 43\% were mQFT30-positive. Agreement between the BEC and BHP Bovigam® assays was high (κ=0.86, 95\% CI 0.75–0.97) and these detected the most test-positive animals suggesting that they were the most sensitive assays. Interferon-gamma release was significantly greater in buffaloes that were test-positive for all tests than in animals with discordant but positive Bovigam® results. Agreement between the mQFT assays was equally high (κ=0.88, 95\% CI 0.77–0.98); however, all buffaloes with discordant mQFT results (n=6) were mQFT30-positive/mQFT20-negative, including three confirmed M. bovis-infected animals, suggesting that the mQFT30 assay is the more sensitive of the two. Agreements between the two Bovigam® and two mQFT assays were moderate, suggesting that in its current format the mQFT assay is less sensitive than either the BEC or the BHP assays.},
	number = {1},
	urldate = {2019-03-12TZ},
	journal = {Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology},
	author = {Goosen, Wynand J. and Miller, Michele A. and Chegou, Novel N. and Cooper, David and Warren, Robin M. and van Helden, Paul D. and Parsons, Sven D. C.},
	month = jul,
	year = {2014},
	keywords = {African buffalo, Bovigam, Bovine tuberculosis, CFP-10, ESAT-6, Interferon-gamma},
	pages = {133--138}
}

Downloads: 0