@incollection{graham2013,
	title = {The {HeritageCrowd} {Project}:: {A} {Case} {Study} in {Crowdsourcing} {Public} {History}},
	shorttitle = {遗产众包项目：：众包公共历史案例研究},
	url = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65sx57.24},
	abstract = {Digital history is public history: when we put materials online, we enter into a conversation with individuals from all walks of life, with various voices and degrees of professionalism. In this essay, we discuss our experience in relinquishing control of the historical voice in order to crowdsource cultural heritage and history. What is the role of the historian when we crowdsource history? Whose history is it anyway—the historian’s or the crowd’s? Which crowd can lay claim to it?   \textit{Wikipedia} , the exemplar par excellence of what crowdsourcing can accomplish, has perhaps the most succinct and elegant definition of the term:

【摘要翻译】数字历史是公共历史：当我们把资料放到网上时，我们就进入了与来自各行各业、拥有不同声音和专业程度的个人的对话。在这篇文章中，我们将讨论我们放弃对历史话语权的控制以实现文化遗产和历史众包的经验。当我们众包历史时，历史学家的角色是什么？这到底是谁的历史--历史学家的还是群众的？哪个人群可以宣称拥有它？   维基百科》（Wikipedia）{\textless}i{\textgreater}{\textless}/i{\textgreater}作为众包所能实现的卓越典范，或许对这一术语做出了最简洁、最优雅的定义：},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2021-03-08},
	booktitle = {Writing {History} in the {Digital} {Age}},
	publisher = {University of Michigan Press},
	author = {Graham, Shawn and Massie, Guy and Feuerherm, Nadine},
	editor = {Dougherty, Jack and Nawrotzki, Kristen},
	year = {2013},
	note = {🏷️ /unread},
	keywords = {/unread},
	pages = {222--232},
}

{"_id":"wSnnRxZLX4jJdQ22H","bibbaseid":"graham-massie-feuerherm-theheritagecrowdprojectacasestudyincrowdsourcingpublichistory-2013","author_short":["Graham, S.","Massie, G.","Feuerherm, N."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"incollection","type":"incollection","title":"The HeritageCrowd Project:: A Case Study in Crowdsourcing Public History","shorttitle":"遗产众包项目：：众包公共历史案例研究","url":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65sx57.24","abstract":"Digital history is public history: when we put materials online, we enter into a conversation with individuals from all walks of life, with various voices and degrees of professionalism. In this essay, we discuss our experience in relinquishing control of the historical voice in order to crowdsource cultural heritage and history. What is the role of the historian when we crowdsource history? Whose history is it anyway—the historian’s or the crowd’s? Which crowd can lay claim to it? <i>Wikipedia</i> , the exemplar par excellence of what crowdsourcing can accomplish, has perhaps the most succinct and elegant definition of the term: 【摘要翻译】数字历史是公共历史：当我们把资料放到网上时，我们就进入了与来自各行各业、拥有不同声音和专业程度的个人的对话。在这篇文章中，我们将讨论我们放弃对历史话语权的控制以实现文化遗产和历史众包的经验。当我们众包历史时，历史学家的角色是什么？这到底是谁的历史–历史学家的还是群众的？哪个人群可以宣称拥有它？ 维基百科》（Wikipedia）\\textlessi\\textgreater\\textless/i\\textgreater作为众包所能实现的卓越典范，或许对这一术语做出了最简洁、最优雅的定义：","language":"en","urldate":"2021-03-08","booktitle":"Writing History in the Digital Age","publisher":"University of Michigan Press","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Graham"],"firstnames":["Shawn"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Massie"],"firstnames":["Guy"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Feuerherm"],"firstnames":["Nadine"],"suffixes":[]}],"editor":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Dougherty"],"firstnames":["Jack"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Nawrotzki"],"firstnames":["Kristen"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2013","note":"🏷️ /unread","keywords":"/unread","pages":"222–232","bibtex":"@incollection{graham2013,\n\ttitle = {The {HeritageCrowd} {Project}:: {A} {Case} {Study} in {Crowdsourcing} {Public} {History}},\n\tshorttitle = {遗产众包项目：：众包公共历史案例研究},\n\turl = {https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65sx57.24},\n\tabstract = {Digital history is public history: when we put materials online, we enter into a conversation with individuals from all walks of life, with various voices and degrees of professionalism. In this essay, we discuss our experience in relinquishing control of the historical voice in order to crowdsource cultural heritage and history. What is the role of the historian when we crowdsource history? Whose history is it anyway—the historian’s or the crowd’s? Which crowd can lay claim to it? \\textit{Wikipedia} , the exemplar par excellence of what crowdsourcing can accomplish, has perhaps the most succinct and elegant definition of the term:\n\n【摘要翻译】数字历史是公共历史：当我们把资料放到网上时，我们就进入了与来自各行各业、拥有不同声音和专业程度的个人的对话。在这篇文章中，我们将讨论我们放弃对历史话语权的控制以实现文化遗产和历史众包的经验。当我们众包历史时，历史学家的角色是什么？这到底是谁的历史--历史学家的还是群众的？哪个人群可以宣称拥有它？ 维基百科》（Wikipedia）{\\textless}i{\\textgreater}{\\textless}/i{\\textgreater}作为众包所能实现的卓越典范，或许对这一术语做出了最简洁、最优雅的定义：},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2021-03-08},\n\tbooktitle = {Writing {History} in the {Digital} {Age}},\n\tpublisher = {University of Michigan Press},\n\tauthor = {Graham, Shawn and Massie, Guy and Feuerherm, Nadine},\n\teditor = {Dougherty, Jack and Nawrotzki, Kristen},\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread},\n\tkeywords = {/unread},\n\tpages = {222--232},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Graham, S.","Massie, G.","Feuerherm, N."],"editor_short":["Dougherty, J.","Nawrotzki, K."],"key":"graham2013","id":"graham2013","bibbaseid":"graham-massie-feuerherm-theheritagecrowdprojectacasestudyincrowdsourcingpublichistory-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv65sx57.24"},"keyword":["/unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"incollection","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/L5DPTH6D/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["YXnKxykgewaZSWfRw"],"keywords":["/unread"],"search_terms":["heritagecrowd","project","case","study","crowdsourcing","public","history","graham","massie","feuerherm"],"title":"The HeritageCrowd Project:: A Case Study in Crowdsourcing Public History","year":2013}