@article{ grant_typology_2009,
  title = {A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.},
  volume = {26},
  issn = {1471-1834},
  abstract = {The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.},
  number = {2},
  journal = {Health information and libraries journal},
  author = {Grant, Maria J and Booth, Andrew},
  month = {June},
  year = {2009},
  note = {00158},
  keywords = {Controlled, Evidence-Based Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine: classification, Evidence-Based Medicine: statistics \& numerical da, Humans, Information Dissemination, Publication Bias, Publication Bias: statistics \& numerical data, Review Literature as Topic, Terminology as Topic, Vocabulary},
  pages = {91--108}
}

{"_id":"qxFXC9tua7mksBfHs","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Grant","J, M.","Booth, A."],"bibbaseid":"grant-j-booth-atypologyofreviewsananalysisof14reviewtypesandassociatedmethodologies-2009","bibdata":{"abstract":"The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.","author":["Grant","J, Maria","Booth, Andrew"],"author_short":["Grant","J, M.","Booth, A."],"bibtex":"@article{ grant_typology_2009,\n title = {A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.},\n volume = {26},\n issn = {1471-1834},\n abstract = {The expansion of evidence-based practice across sectors has lead to an increasing variety of review types. However, the diversity of terminology used means that the full potential of these review types may be lost amongst a confusion of indistinct and misapplied terms. The objective of this study is to provide descriptive insight into the most common types of reviews, with illustrative examples from health and health information domains.},\n number = {2},\n journal = {Health information and libraries journal},\n author = {Grant, Maria J and Booth, Andrew},\n month = {June},\n year = {2009},\n note = {00158},\n keywords = {Controlled, Evidence-Based Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine: classification, Evidence-Based Medicine: statistics \\& numerical da, Humans, Information Dissemination, Publication Bias, Publication Bias: statistics \\& numerical data, Review Literature as Topic, Terminology as Topic, Vocabulary},\n pages = {91--108}\n}","bibtype":"article","id":"grant_typology_2009","issn":"1471-1834","journal":"Health information and libraries journal","key":"grant_typology_2009","keywords":"Controlled, Evidence-Based Medicine, Evidence-Based Medicine: classification, Evidence-Based Medicine: statistics \\& numerical da, Humans, Information Dissemination, Publication Bias, Publication Bias: statistics \\& numerical data, Review Literature as Topic, Terminology as Topic, Vocabulary","month":"June","note":"00158","number":"2","pages":"91--108","title":"A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.","type":"article","volume":"26","year":"2009","bibbaseid":"grant-j-booth-atypologyofreviewsananalysisof14reviewtypesandassociatedmethodologies-2009","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Controlled","Evidence-Based Medicine","Evidence-Based Medicine: classification","Evidence-Based Medicine: statistics \\& numerical da","Humans","Information Dissemination","Publication Bias","Publication Bias: statistics \\& numerical data","Review Literature as Topic","Terminology as Topic","Vocabulary"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/616290/collections/2Q4UBS63/items?key=7DIofkHXxPtCcQmgpwaTjD6E&format=bibtex&limit=100","creationDate":"2015-02-26T14:14:11.238Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["controlled","evidence-based medicine","evidence-based medicine: classification","evidence-based medicine: statistics \\& numerical da","humans","information dissemination","publication bias","publication bias: statistics \\& numerical data","review literature as topic","terminology as topic","vocabulary"],"search_terms":["typology","reviews","analysis","review","types","associated","methodologies","grant","j","booth"],"title":"A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.","year":2009,"dataSources":["L438hNawXwCEa3wqc"]}