@ARTICLE{Gray2024-mf,
  title     = "Languaging Ethics in Technology Practice",
  author    = "Gray, Colin M and Chivukula, Shruthi Sai and Johns, Janna and
               Will, Matthew and Obi, Ike and Li, Ziqing",
  journal   = "ACM J. Responsib. Comput.",
  publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",
  address   = "New York, NY, USA",
  volume    =  1,
  number    =  2,
  pages     = "1--15",
  abstract  = "Ethics as embodied by technology practitioners resists simple
               definition—particularly as it relates to the interplay of
               identity, organizational, and professional complexity. In this
               article, we use the linguistic notion of languaging as an
               analytic lens to describe how technology and design practitioners
               negotiate their conception of ethics as they reflect upon their
               everyday work. We engaged 12 practitioners in individual
               co-creation workshops, encouraging them to reflect on their
               ethical role in their everyday work through a series of
               generative and evaluative activities. We analyzed these data to
               identify how each practitioner reasoned about ethics through
               language and artifacts, finding that practitioners used a range
               of rhetorical tropes to describe their ethical commitments and
               beliefs in ways that were complex and sometimes contradictory.
               Across three cases, we describe how ethics was negotiated through
               language across three key zones of ecological emergence: the
               practitioners’ “core” beliefs about ethics, internal and external
               ecological elements that shaped or mediated these core beliefs,
               and the ultimate boundaries they reported refusing to cross.
               Building on these findings, we describe how the languaging of
               ethics reveals opportunities to definitionally and practically
               engage with ethics in technology ethics research, practice, and
               education.",
  month     =  jun,
  year      =  2024,
  url       = "https://doi.org/10.1145/3656468",
  keywords  = "Ethics, technology practice, languaging, rhetoric, co-creation",
  doi       = "10.1145/3656468"
}

{"_id":"C9woT7pBdMDaYdCRS","bibbaseid":"gray-chivukula-johns-will-obi-li-languagingethicsintechnologypractice-2024","author_short":["Gray, C. M","Chivukula, S. S.","Johns, J.","Will, M.","Obi, I.","Li, Z."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Languaging Ethics in Technology Practice","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Gray"],"firstnames":["Colin","M"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Chivukula"],"firstnames":["Shruthi","Sai"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Johns"],"firstnames":["Janna"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Will"],"firstnames":["Matthew"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Obi"],"firstnames":["Ike"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Li"],"firstnames":["Ziqing"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"ACM J. Responsib. Comput.","publisher":"Association for Computing Machinery","address":"New York, NY, USA","volume":"1","number":"2","pages":"1–15","abstract":"Ethics as embodied by technology practitioners resists simple definition—particularly as it relates to the interplay of identity, organizational, and professional complexity. In this article, we use the linguistic notion of languaging as an analytic lens to describe how technology and design practitioners negotiate their conception of ethics as they reflect upon their everyday work. We engaged 12 practitioners in individual co-creation workshops, encouraging them to reflect on their ethical role in their everyday work through a series of generative and evaluative activities. We analyzed these data to identify how each practitioner reasoned about ethics through language and artifacts, finding that practitioners used a range of rhetorical tropes to describe their ethical commitments and beliefs in ways that were complex and sometimes contradictory. Across three cases, we describe how ethics was negotiated through language across three key zones of ecological emergence: the practitioners’ “core” beliefs about ethics, internal and external ecological elements that shaped or mediated these core beliefs, and the ultimate boundaries they reported refusing to cross. Building on these findings, we describe how the languaging of ethics reveals opportunities to definitionally and practically engage with ethics in technology ethics research, practice, and education.","month":"June","year":"2024","url":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3656468","keywords":"Ethics, technology practice, languaging, rhetoric, co-creation","doi":"10.1145/3656468","bibtex":"@ARTICLE{Gray2024-mf,\n title = \"Languaging Ethics in Technology Practice\",\n author = \"Gray, Colin M and Chivukula, Shruthi Sai and Johns, Janna and\n Will, Matthew and Obi, Ike and Li, Ziqing\",\n journal = \"ACM J. Responsib. Comput.\",\n publisher = \"Association for Computing Machinery\",\n address = \"New York, NY, USA\",\n volume = 1,\n number = 2,\n pages = \"1--15\",\n abstract = \"Ethics as embodied by technology practitioners resists simple\n definition—particularly as it relates to the interplay of\n identity, organizational, and professional complexity. In this\n article, we use the linguistic notion of languaging as an\n analytic lens to describe how technology and design practitioners\n negotiate their conception of ethics as they reflect upon their\n everyday work. We engaged 12 practitioners in individual\n co-creation workshops, encouraging them to reflect on their\n ethical role in their everyday work through a series of\n generative and evaluative activities. We analyzed these data to\n identify how each practitioner reasoned about ethics through\n language and artifacts, finding that practitioners used a range\n of rhetorical tropes to describe their ethical commitments and\n beliefs in ways that were complex and sometimes contradictory.\n Across three cases, we describe how ethics was negotiated through\n language across three key zones of ecological emergence: the\n practitioners’ “core” beliefs about ethics, internal and external\n ecological elements that shaped or mediated these core beliefs,\n and the ultimate boundaries they reported refusing to cross.\n Building on these findings, we describe how the languaging of\n ethics reveals opportunities to definitionally and practically\n engage with ethics in technology ethics research, practice, and\n education.\",\n month = jun,\n year = 2024,\n url = \"https://doi.org/10.1145/3656468\",\n keywords = \"Ethics, technology practice, languaging, rhetoric, co-creation\",\n doi = \"10.1145/3656468\"\n}\n\r\n","author_short":["Gray, C. M","Chivukula, S. S.","Johns, J.","Will, M.","Obi, I.","Li, Z."],"key":"Gray2024-mf","id":"Gray2024-mf","bibbaseid":"gray-chivukula-johns-will-obi-li-languagingethicsintechnologypractice-2024","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3656468"},"keyword":["Ethics","technology practice","languaging","rhetoric","co-creation"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/yEDN4DodMtih9KdtS","dataSources":["EHXzeoGkDeGY7skkh"],"keywords":["ethics","technology practice","languaging","rhetoric","co-creation"],"search_terms":["languaging","ethics","technology","practice","gray","chivukula","johns","will","obi","li"],"title":"Languaging Ethics in Technology Practice","year":2024}